- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NCAA Rules in regards to Targetting.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:39 am
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:39 am
There is such a thing in the rules stating that a "post Game Review" of targeting may be conducted by NCAA and if deemed appropriate and justified suspension of Player can be reversed. (If i read the dam thing right)
5
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:40 am to WhiskeyPlease
Therefore calls need to be made to Aleva and NCAA and SEC for such a review by us thousands of Fans.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:41 am to WhiskeyPlease
I believe the rule you are quoting is for games that don’t use instant replay.
The replay review was the “appeal”.
I don’t like it either. But that’s the way the rule reads.
The replay review was the “appeal”.
I don’t like it either. But that’s the way the rule reads.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:41 am to WhiskeyPlease
DW40’merely shoved him with arms and no head contact
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:42 am to WhiskeyPlease
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:44 am to Rebel
Quote: believe the rule you are quoting is for games that don’t use instant replay.
The replay review was the “appeal”.
Again if i read it right it did not specified games with no replay. And this review is "Post Game" after the Officials and replay
The replay review was the “appeal”.
Again if i read it right it did not specified games with no replay. And this review is "Post Game" after the Officials and replay
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:46 am to The Baker
Which they wrongly suspended Fulton for!!! So there shouldn’t be payback for that
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:46 am to LSUBlitzkrieg
DW40’merely shoved him with arms and no head contact
Correct, White dint even left the ground i may be wrong.
Correct, White dint even left the ground i may be wrong.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:48 am to WhiskeyPlease
quote:
Again if i read it right it did not specified games with no replay.
Find the rule and go up 3 paragraphs. The entire section is for games without replay.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:52 am to WhiskeyPlease
The SEC set a precedent by overturning a targeting call against Dylan Moses after the game. The call had been upheld by in-game replay.
What’s good for the golden goose is good for the gander, too.
What’s good for the golden goose is good for the gander, too.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 2:39 am to TheFranchise
.no shite?
Posted on 10/21/18 at 4:21 am to TheFranchise
quote:
The SEC set a precedent by overturning a targeting call against Dylan Moses after the game. The call had been upheld by in-game replay.
Really? If true then that would prove a double standard.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 4:26 am to TheFranchise
Really? Link?
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:17 am to JudgeHolden
No. Not true.
The Dylan Moses targeting call was reversed on the review on site.
LINK
The Dylan Moses targeting call was reversed on the review on site.
quote:
#Alabama LB Dylan Moses gets flagged for targeting on this monster hit on #Louisana QB Andre Nunez, but it’s correctly overturned b/c he led with his shoulder.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 6:19 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News