- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Miles considering Jefferson at QB
Posted on 10/27/08 at 8:51 am to Wolf Shirt
Posted on 10/27/08 at 8:51 am to Wolf Shirt
Why not burn his redshirt? You think he wants to be in the same class as Sheppard? Start JJ against Tulane. We will beat Tulane on talent alone. Why not let the kid have some fun and lets see what he's made of? Benching Lee may wake him up and light a fire under his arse for Bama.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 8:54 am to PinevilleTiger
quote:
Benching Lee may wake him up and light a fire under his arse for Bama.
I don't get it, do you think he enjoys making mistakes? If you think a RS Freshman with a good arm is having growing pains, what the frick do you think is going to happen with a true Freshman?
Posted on 10/27/08 at 8:56 am to BT
Flip side of the QB argument: why hasn't our D generated more turnovers? We have, what, 7 in 7 games so far?
The D has not shown up at all, plain and simple. We knew the QBs would struggle. But the D was supposed to bail us out.
The D has not shown up at all, plain and simple. We knew the QBs would struggle. But the D was supposed to bail us out.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 8:56 am to SA4LSU
at least playing Jefferson now will get him ready for next season. If He starts getting a lot of playing time now we won't be in th same situation next season as we were this season of starting a QB with no quality game experience under his belt. It's hard for me to believe that he could be any more innaccurate than Lee and were fricked against bama with Lee starting anyway, might as well go with the future now.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 8:57 am to amiznit
quote:
The D has not shown up at all, plain and simple. We knew the QBs would struggle. But the D was supposed to bail us out.
We have a winner.
I agree 100%.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 8:58 am to cepheid
quote:
at least playing Jefferson now will get him ready for next season. If He starts getting a lot of playing time now we won't be in th same situation next season as we were this season of starting a QB with no quality game experience under his belt. It's hard for me to believe that he could be any more innaccurate than Lee and were fricked against bama with Lee starting anyway, might as well go with the future now.
So let me get this straight, after a full season pretty much being the full time starter, you think that Jarrett Lee will not get any better?
And seriously, you would want to start another first year QB again next year?
Posted on 10/27/08 at 8:59 am to cepheid
Go with the future? The point of playing one player (in this case Lee) is to get them experience so that they will be better in the future. Constantly switching quarterbacks to appease the fans or "going with the hot hand" is a sure-fire way to keep our team playing at this level.
Go with the future... you're right. Leave Lee in there and let him progress and get better.
Your argument is a logical fallacy. Google it. You may learn something.
Go with the future... you're right. Leave Lee in there and let him progress and get better.
Your argument is a logical fallacy. Google it. You may learn something.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:03 am to cepheid
quote:
at least playing Jefferson now will get him ready for next season. If He starts getting a lot of playing time now we won't be in th same situation next season as we were this season of starting a QB with no quality game experience under his belt. It's hard for me to believe that he could be any more innaccurate than Lee and were fricked against bama with Lee starting anyway, might as well go with the future now.
People that have the above thought pattern concerning our QB's at first made me mad, now its becoming comical. part of you idiots think JJ starts next yr, other part thinks RS starts next yr....


only thing i think is that none of us no what pressure and how hard of a job it is on a fresh qb to play in the sec. The dude guy is taking his lumps as we speak, and some of you want to go back with more inexperience. FUKING STUPID.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:03 am to Prominentwon
quote:I guess it's like working a problem while trying to find "x". You sometimes have to use different numbers to arrive at "x". JJ is just another number.
How is putting in a true freshman that has taken on snap for an option run to replace a RS freshman going to solve anything?
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:04 am to Chicken
quote:
Jefferson could be worse than Lee...
that's real hard to imagine
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:05 am to thegreatone
Why can't LSU start Hatch, and let the team get into a groove. Bring in Lee (like in the Auburn game) to make throws every 3rd or 4th series. LSU has a powerful run blocking O-line and should rely on it. Hatch limits the play book, but he doesn't turnover the ball, and Lee will still get experience taking about 10 - 15 snaps a game!
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:06 am to geauxaddai
Also, as some stated, the D isn't here. Last year the D saved Flynn's arse more than a few times.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:07 am to geauxaddai
quote:
that's real hard to imagine
Not really. There's many a QB that can throw a few picks and not score any TD's to make up for them.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:11 am to PinevilleTiger
It can't get much worse. He may surprise us.What the hell. Give it a run.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:14 am to lsu in da atl
My dad would call you people fair-weather fans. You people jump on the bandwagon when we go undefeated or lose 1 game, but anything else happens and you start calling for people's heads.
You have to take the good with the bad. This isn't NCAA 09. In reality, teams lose every now and then. We aren't playing on Junior Varsity and scoring 120 points every game. We're playing real life and you never know what can happen.
That's why the game is played.
You have to take the good with the bad. This isn't NCAA 09. In reality, teams lose every now and then. We aren't playing on Junior Varsity and scoring 120 points every game. We're playing real life and you never know what can happen.
That's why the game is played.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:18 am to lsu in da atl
quote:
It can't get much worse. He may surprise us.What the hell. Give it a run.
Yes it can
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:21 am to thegreatone
quote:
If you score 38 points in the SEC you shouldn't lose.
If you take away the points directly attributed to Lee intercptions (17 points), WE WIN 38-35. We may have won with a higher margin had the defense not been force to deal with playing against Georgia and our own QB.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:23 am to thegreatone
problem is when you lay out over 3 mil for a coach and have some to the highest paid assistants in the NCAA - you expect to be competitive
The losses can be dealt with - not being in the game--- that is a whole different story
The losses can be dealt with - not being in the game--- that is a whole different story
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:25 am to TigerEast
I understand that Lee accounted for 14 points Saturday, but that still means we gave up 38 points on D. How many national championship teams do that? The last I checked every team in the last 15 years or so who have one a NC have had a top 5 defense. And since the only thing acceptable at LSU is a National Championship apparently, we NEED to improve our D.
Lee is a freshmen. There are senior quarterbacks all over the nation who can't hold a candle to his farts. That's my point.
Lee is a freshmen. There are senior quarterbacks all over the nation who can't hold a candle to his farts. That's my point.
Posted on 10/27/08 at 9:28 am to thegreatone
ITs okay to support your team, and your favorite player-- but it also helps to be objective
Popular
Back to top
