- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:36 am to OBUDan
quote:
I thought I explained "the common perception"?
lol, noooo Dan, you threw all these things out there, and then you ended it with that quote, that all these things were "coaching" to you.
It's a simple question. Is that your perception on what coaching is all about? Or is that the common perception on what coaching is all about?
You need to decide this before we go on any further. I'm not mocking you. I'm making a very valid and solidly based point.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:38 am to OBUDan
quote:
What to you makes a good coach?
What aspects is Miles failing in in your opinion?
While I would love to indulge in that fattening talk, we're not talking about what makes a good coach or what aspects Miles is failing at. We could go all night talking about such things.
Your statement is what is being discussed here.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
So it is Miles fault. Congrats.
Some things sure. Never said otherwise.
All things... not really.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:46 am to jdrumdog
quote:
Is that your perception on what coaching is all about? Or is that the common perception on what coaching is all about?
I thought I delineated it pretty clearly.
Coaching is many, many things, as I described.
But the common perception is that coaching is just clock management or x's and o's or gameplanning.
These are the things that are constantly criticized, typically by people who wouldn't know a thing about any of them.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:48 am to OBUDan
quote:
But the common perception is that coaching is just clock management or x's and o's or gameplanning.
Alright, good. How do you know that this is the common perception on what coaching is?
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:49 am to OBUDan
quote:
Coaching is many, many things, as I described.
that's right, that's how YOU described it.
Now, is that what coaching really is, or is that what you perceive to be the correct definition of what coaching REALLY is? We're getting to a conclusion shortly, I guarantee you.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:51 am to jdrumdog
quote:
Alright, good. How do you know that this is the common perception on what coaching is?
Because there's probably 100+ threads about it started on here every day.
And most of the time they involve the use of terms that are easy for most people to learn and repeat without any actual knowledge of.
It's the same thing politically... A strong majority of the population believes Obama raised taxes. It's just as easy for them to say "Obama raised taxes" as it is to say, "Miles didn't make adjustments."
Doesn't make either opinion any more correct.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:55 am to jdrumdog
quote:
Now, is that what coaching really is, or is that what you perceive to be the correct definition of what coaching REALLY is? We're getting to a conclusion shortly, I guarantee you.
I'm sure that what you are getting at is that just because it's "my perception" doesn't make it the right perception.
You are trying to come up with some sort of logical fallacy argument for an abstract subject matter.
Just because the majority believes something doesn't make it right.
Just because I believe something doesn't make it right either.
But in this case I'm basing my opinion off of what I've seen the majority state repeatedly, on a surface level.
My opinion of what coaching is is at least grounded in something more than a loose set of terms that are commonly misused.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 12:59 am to OBUDan
quote:
But the common perception is that coaching is just clock management or x's and o's or gameplanning.
It isn't the common perception. Most of is are not ignorant hayseeds and realize what it takes to be the executive of a college football program.
There are things Mils has done well and unlike yourself, I thing recruiting is one of them. Developing talent isn't one. Unfortunately for Miles, his players attending classes isn't going to get him any more job security.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:00 am to OBUDan
quote:
Doesn't make either opinion any more correct.
you still don't get it.
You didn't present as an opinion, you presented it as a fact. Not once, until you got called on how ridiculous the statement was, did you backtrack until you finally had to make up "well it was just an opinion". No, you didn't present as such. You presented it as "the common perception."
You're using terms like "probably", "most of the time", these are "assumption" words. You're assuming, and you're grabbing at straws, and you have no idea whether that's the "common perception", and even if so, you're confining yourself to this board in doing so...which would be in direct conflict with what a "common perception" would be without a direct reference to your base.
You used a political example....not a good move. You cant point to studies done to prove your point at any time, and that's plausible. but you can't just throw out there that you automatically know what the majority of people define "coaching" as.
Here, by definition is the kicker, however.
LINK
LINK
Now, if you want to argue that some of the responsibilities of the head coach are some of those that you point out earlier, that's entirely up to you. However, they aren't part of "coaching", it completely contradicts what the word inherently is defined as.
What's more....those who want to attack Miles based upon his training, instruction, and preparation truly attack his COACHING, consistent with it's proper use. You just can't start assigning what words mean in the broader context of the world....we have modern day dictionaries for that.
Now, if you want to throw your own perceptual definitions to the English language, that's up to you. But you can't present them as an inherent fact, like you did. Plus, if you're using this board as a base to substantiate the claim, I think you and me both know that's not accurate in the slightest.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:02 am to OBUDan
quote:
But in this case I'm basing my opinion off of what I've seen the majority state repeatedly, on a surface level.
you stated it as fact, not opinion. You're back crawling your way out of it....which I expected.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:02 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Most of is are not ignorant hayseeds and realize what it takes to be the executive of a college football program.
Not really.
You do, surely. But most, don't.
quote:
There are things Mils has done well and unlike yourself, I thing recruiting is one of them. Developing talent isn't one. Unfortunately for Miles, his players attending classes isn't going to get him any more job security.
Ha, I'm not sure why you are mistaking what I said earlier as Miles doing a poor job recruiting, but hey, to each his own I guess.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:03 am to OBUDan
quote:
You are trying to come up with some sort of logical fallacy argument for an abstract subject matter.
Negative, the word "coaching" is defined as I have presented above. It is not an "abstract" word.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:03 am to jdrumdog
quote:
you stated it as fact, not opinion. You're back crawling your way out of it....which I expected.
This is such a pathetic straw man.
It's a fricking message board. Everyone states shite as fact.
No one comes on here and qualifies every fricking thing they say as..."Now this is just my opinion."
Of course it was my opinion...
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:05 am to jdrumdog
quote:
Here, by definition is the kicker, however.
LINK
LINK
So by definition coaching is "a large, horse-drawn, four-wheeled carriage, usually enclosed."
You got me good....
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:06 am to OBUDan
quote:
Why don't you provide any historical context to your numbers?
Why not other coaches five year spans?
Why not give any heed to other mitigating factors that may result in losses?
Why does everything have to be about coaching?
Coaching is THE most overrated aspect of college football in the way it is commonly perceived.
This is your original statement Dan. You even made sure to capitalize "THE" to make it inherently clear that this is irrefutable....unless you just decided to highlight that one word just for the hell of it.
It's ok, but that statement is inherently wrong. I can't believe you don't understand this, I suppose I gave you more credit for being logical and a tad bit more intelligent.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:08 am to OBUDan
quote:
Ha, I'm not sure why you are mistaking what I said earlier as Miles doing a poor job recruiting, but hey, to each his own I guess.
Not sure how you can interpret you rantings about the talent not being there any other way.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:08 am to OBUDan
quote:
You got me good....
*sigh*
quote:
to instruct, direct, or prompt as a coach
quote:
to train intensively (as by instruction and demonstration)
quote:
to act as coach of
quote:
to give instruction or advice to in the capacity of a coach; instruct: She has coached the present tennis champion.
You're just being stupid at this point. Please don't be. You should be better than that. Don't sink to that idiotic level, please keep your wits about you.
Posted on 10/29/10 at 1:09 am to jdrumdog
quote:
Now, if you want to argue that some of the responsibilities of the head coach are some of those that you point out earlier, that's entirely up to you. However, they aren't part of "coaching", it completely contradicts what the word inherently is defined as.
What's more....those who want to attack Miles based upon his training, instruction, and preparation truly attack his COACHING, consistent with it's proper use. You just can't start assigning what words mean in the broader context of the world....we have modern day dictionaries for that.
Now, if you want to throw your own perceptual definitions to the English language, that's up to you. But you can't present them as an inherent fact, like you did. Plus, if you're using this board as a base to substantiate the claim, I think you and me both know that's not accurate in the slightest.
Jesus Christ.
Congrats, you took four sentences of mine and proceeded to mentally deconstruct them for your own intellectual weight-lifting.
You are now taking my opinion, claiming I stated is a fact, which I never did, you only interpreted it as such, claiming that I am trying to redefine the term coaching, when I merely stated that it's a lot more than it's typically defined as, and tried to twist this into some sort of linguistic/philosophical discussion that pertains to the actual discussion at hand in no way at all.
If you really had that hard of a time understanding what I was talking about in generalities, I'm not sure there's any sense in continuing conversation.
Popular
Back to top


1


