re: Media Talking about knowing who bama is

quote:

---

The game will be played on the field so lets just see what happens.

---

No.

Lets' discuss it first.

After all, isn't that what the board is for?

quote:

---

Tennessee turned out to be bad.

---

lots of teams have folded up after getting beat down by bama. LSU last year?

quote:

---

Ole Miss played them closer than they did us.

---

Hurts first sec road game...bama played pretty well after being down 21

quote:

---

A&M was actually up by a point in the 3rd quarter

---

7-1 is a good team

quote:

---

Umm how have we done against these same opponents since Ed O has taken over?

---

what does that have to do with how bama has looked

The whole point of the thread was that they are saying we don't know who LSU and Aubrun is yet and I'm saying we don't know what bama's offense is yet. What does your question have to do with my original question?

Then why is everyone questioning LSUs offense now that we have dominated our last few opponents? We can question LSU's but not bama's simply bc they are Bama? Ok look above I have posted what their dominate offense has faced this year and what they are coming up against this Saturday. Huge difference that's what it has to do with. If that argument of we don't know what LSU is yet is made then it has to be made for Bama's offense also because it's the facts. The fact that they have looked good means nothing because they haven't faced a defense yet. Same with LSU in these last few games under coach Ed O.

quote:

---

Then why is everyone questioning LSUs offense now that we have dominated our last few opponents?

---

maybe years of shite for an offense carries more weight than 3 games verses suspect defensive teams...do you think S. Miss's defense is anywhere close to bamas?

quote:

---

We can question LSU's but not bama's simply bc they are Bama?

---

Pretty much...they have won 20 games in a row. Compete for playoff berths and the sec every year. Face it they are the king of the hill and really don't need to answer any questions. Vegas isn't biased and they have them as double digit favorites. They are a great team. I don't understand why you would argue they aren't....LSU could be a great team but they have "questions" to answer before being labeled a great team...2 losses will do that. Getting your arse kicked by bama last year and then losing to ole miss and Arkansas will do that.

I'm NOT arguing they aren't a great team, my argument is that so is this LSU team that has dominated every opponent under the new coach. We have actually looked better against OM. My argument is that if everyone can say that we don't know what we have yet then you can say the same about Bama. I know they are a great team and have been but I just believe this HC is far and above our previous in terms of effectiveness on game day.

Ok well so is LSU not USC, or Tennessee.

quote:

---

I don't think many will agree until we beat bama or see how we play against bama...bama is a measuring stick not Mizzou and S. Miss

---

All true, but Southern Miss is a better team than most people realize. They're ranked in top 25 in total offense and defense. They beat a decent Kentucky team. Yes, they dropped a game they should've won, but they're probably the best win we have outside of Ole Miss.

I've come to learn that people just disagree just for the sake or if it's an unpopular argument. I don't care I've pulled up the facts so they can disagree with the fact that bama hasn't played a defense yet just like LSU hasn't since its begun dominating everyone they have played.