Thing is tho, this discussion should not be about transitive properties. We don't really need to know if LSU beat UW so LSU can beat Stanford. What we wanted to know is how good is the Washington team that LSU beat. So far they've been good enough to beat Stanford. If, just for example, Washington goes on to win the PAC there is no transitive propositions and there is no discounting LSU, the discussion is purely about hey LSU dominated a good team. That's the point even the media can't seem to square up in their sights.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by tiger7166

Louisiana

Member since Dec 2007

2714 posts

Posted on 9/28/12 at 12:00 pm to BRtoATL

quote:
Don't disagree with what he said about LSU. Like he said.. When LSU travels down to the Swamp we will see how good this team is. Florida has a fast defense. And a solid offense at the moment. Can Driskel or Mettenberger get it done?

I really don't think ratings matter at this point, other than affecting the thinking of recruits, and not sure if it does.
It just seems that transitive properties only work to show how weak LSU is. i.e. LSU barely beat a Auburn team that barely beat a ULM team so let's move them down. Also it seems that LSU always has to prove themselves on yet another stage.

This post was edited on 9/28/12 at 12:14 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by omegaman66

greenwell springs

Member since Oct 2007

27354 posts

Posted on 9/28/12 at 12:00 pm to BRtoATL

Duh you people are brain dead today. LSU totally dominated the first three opponents. The fourth game LSU dominated everywhere on the stat sheet except the score which LSU won but just barely.

How can anyone look at all of that and think LSU is worth a crap is beyond me. Must be using twisted logic!