- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU's Resume vs. St John's Resume
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:37 pm to hendersonshands
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:37 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
You can say LSU had a better resume but they had a losing record against the top 25 and 50
So did St. Johns, and LSU had more wins.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:38 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
You can say LSU had a better resume but they had a losing record against the top 25 and 50 plus they sucked in conference
seems pretty clear that the overall resume should be more important
but then again, i dont follow college baseball like the folks at bucknell and valpo do
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:39 pm to TigahRag
What they don't get is that the poor record vs the top 25 & 50 plus not making the tournament is a big factor. St. John's didn't do well vs the top 25 & 50 but they took care of business in conference.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:40 pm to DBG
yeah, you're right .. there's no way anyone on that committee, knowing full well they would be on the committee, took the time out to carefully follow college baseball this season .. no doubt all those dufuses just showed up this weekend and had to be briefed on who is in what conference and how many innings constitutes a regulation game ...
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:40 pm to CerealKilla
That's right, but St. John's did well in their conference. So that trumps a little less shitty record vs the top
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:41 pm to TigahRag
quote:
that made the decision said our weak non conference schedule
St. Johns had a weaker OOC schedule than LSU. So the opponents we play aren't relevant, just where you play the game. Got it.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:42 pm to hendersonshands
why do NONE of these people bring up MISSISSIPPI STATE ? why do none of these people bring up 31-10 GEORGIA ? is it because they are in the SEC ?
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:43 pm to TigahRag
didnt say that
but i will say the AD at valpo isnt going to have as educated an opinion as the AD at texas a&m, the AD at florida, the AD at cal state fullerton, etc.
but i will say the AD at valpo isnt going to have as educated an opinion as the AD at texas a&m, the AD at florida, the AD at cal state fullerton, etc.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:43 pm to TigahRag
quote:
why do NONE of these people bring up MISSISSIPPI STATE ? why do none of these people bring up 31-10 GEORGIA ? is it because they are in the SEC ?
Probably because this thread says "LSU's resume vs St John's resume"
We should be in over Mississippi St, St Johns, and Dallas Baptist.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:44 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
That's right, but St. John's did well in their conference. So that trumps a little less shitty record vs the top
Then continue to schedule cupcakes because conference record trumps quality of OOC opponents.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:44 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Dallas Baptist.
Did they win their tourney or was that an at-large?
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:45 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Probably because this thread says "LSU's resume vs St John's resume"
it's not just this thread .. it is all over the place .. everyone has the impression st. john's stole LSU's bid .. and if every thread around here was required to stay in line with the original subject, this would be a three-page website ..
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:45 pm to CerealKilla
quote:
Then continue to schedule cupcakes because conference record trumps quality of OOC opponents.
but LSU got hammered for not leaving the Box to play an OOC game.
double standard.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:45 pm to Golfer
quote:
Did they win their tourney or was that an at-large?
They are an independent. They don't have a tournament to win. And they didn't play a particularly tough schedule, and lost most of their games to the good teams they played.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:46 pm to TigahRag
We aren't discussing State because they weren't the last team in. St. Johns was.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:46 pm to TigahRag
quote:
it's not just this thread .. it is all over the place .. everyone has the impression st. john's stole LSU's bid ..
Its pretty clear STJ was the last 3 seed in and LSU is the 65th team.
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:47 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
They are an independent. They don't have a tournament to win. And they didn't play a particularly tough schedule, and lost most of their games to the good teams they played.
frick, so they get the Notre Dame treatment?
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:47 pm to DBG
quote:
they finished 2nd in the big east
Got it. So fans are pissed that a team that finished second in it's conference got a bit, and LSU who didn't even make the conference tournament didn't get in?
Posted on 5/30/11 at 2:47 pm to Golfer
quote:
but LSU got hammered for not leaving the Box to play an OOC game
Then, we should have just played those shitty teams on the road!!
Popular
Back to top


1



