Started By
Message

re: LSU's QBs looked mediocre.

Posted on 11/14/10 at 1:26 pm to
Posted by SaltyTiger53
Delhi, La
Member since Aug 2008
355 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

You've got to be fricking kidding me.


Nah, man. Perhaps you have never played or coached sports. but thats how it is
Posted by fishngrits
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2008
449 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeee, the freaking record is what it is cause LSU football has done what they had to do to become 9-1.


You're pleased just because LSU is 9-1; I'm pleased that they're 9-1 too. I'm not pleased with the way it has gone down. Some of those wins should not have been so difficult to come by, and if not for Tennessee committing a penalty, we lose that game.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81579 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

who knows, really?
really?

Lee had a mediocre game: UT

Lee had a good game: UF

Lee had shitty games: All others.

JJ had a good game: Bama

JJ had mediocre games: AU and MSU

JJ had shitty games: All others.

Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81579 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

in reality the staff has probably done a good job this year with the offense it has


Wow.

I'm speechless.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

I'm speechless.


the offense is a mess and the qb's are sub-par, but they've managed around that pretty well thanks to a great defense and special teams. they still must be held accountable for the mess though, since they created it. not that hard to understand...
Posted by Lonnie4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
9525 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Some of those wins should not have been so difficult to come by


Perhaps, but "come by" they were and in the grand scheme of college football...nothing else matters.

We should all be giving it up for this team rather then belittling the results of their efforts by telling them they didn't win pretty enough or that their wins were too hard for them to "come by."

quote:

if not for Tennessee


"if"...there is no "if" in college foodball. There is only did you win or didn't you win and LSU did.

Normally, "if" is used by those who lose and not by those who win, but some here seem to have a real want to "if" away wins and to this point, a damn fine football season.

Go figure, huh..........



Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33031 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

really?

Since you went all in on JJ, your attempts to defend him are getting stoopid


JJ
quote:

North Carolina 15-21-1 71.4 151 2 51 1-21 153.73
Vanderbilt 8-20-1 40.0 96 0 24 1-6 70.32
Mississippi State 10-16-0 62.5 97 0 21 1-2 113.43
West Virginia 10-22-2 45.5 75 0 20 2-8 55.91
Tennessee 3-10-2 30.0 30 0 17 0-0 15.20
Florida 7-12-1 58.3 100 0 29 1-8 111.67
McNeese St. 5-8-0 62.5 28 0 15 2-17 91.90
Auburn 7-14-1 50.0 46 0 12 2-15 63.31
Alabama 10-13-0 76.9 141 1 75 0-0 193.42

Lee
quote:

Tennessee 16-23-1 69.6 185 0 47 2-17 128.43
Florida 9-11-0 81.8 124 2 38 0-0 236.51
McNeese St. 9-14-0 64.3 75 0 18 1-7 109.29
Auburn 8-14-0 57.1 43 0 9 1-10 82.94
Alabama 4-7-0 57.1 67 0 47 1-12 137.54

129.3 is below average in the SEC, currently
JJ - above avg games
NC, Bama

JJ - below avg games
Moo St, UF

JJ - crapfests
Vandy, WVa, Tenn, McNeese, Aub, ULM

Lee - above avg
UF, Bama

Lee - below avg
Tenn, McNeese

Lee - crapfests
Aub, ULM
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
31607 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Lee - crapfests
Aub, ULM



His stats would have looked a little better if the two TD's he threw had not been muffed by our 2 5* WR's.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

the offense is a mess and the qb's are sub-par, but they've managed around that pretty well thanks to a great defense and special teams. they still must be held accountable for the mess though, since they created it. not that hard to understand...


Not that hard to understand? How about impossible to understand? How can the coaches be responsible for the mess in the first place, and then somehow have done "pretty well" managing their way around the cards they were dealt at the same time?

It's like you're trying to make some kind of weird hair-splitting argument just for the sake of being difficult.

The writing is on the wall: Given the players LSU has (and, yes, that includes the QBs), we should not have the 3rd worst passing game in the SEC (ahead of only Vanderbilt & Miss. State).
Posted by MiaTigah
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2009
447 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:13 pm to
so frustrating
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Not that hard to understand? How about impossible to understand? How can the coaches be responsible for the mess in the first place, and then somehow have done "pretty well" managing their way around the cards they were dealt at the same time?


No, it is easy to understand. The offensive coaches have been pretty shitty. The other coaches, including the head coach, have done a great job.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:18 pm to
Yeah, except that's not what he's saying.

He's actually trying to make the argument that Crowton and the offensive staff have done a good job because the defense and special teams play have been so great that "strategic mediocrity" on offense is actually a sign of wisdom.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

How can the coaches be responsible for the mess in the first place, and then somehow have done "pretty well" managing their way around the cards they were dealt at the same time?


largely because they've taken much of the risk out of the offense, the first job of the coach is to win games...if you realize you have no offense, then you must manage in order to limit game-costing mistakes. it may be ugly to watch and be statistically horrible, it it can still be the right strategy, given that winning games is the goal.


Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

JJ had a good game: Bama

JJ had mediocre games: AU and MSU

JJ had shitty games: All others.


How was his UNC game shitty? It was his 2nd best game. UF was probably his 3rd best game, but Lee was great that game so people overlook JJ.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

"strategic mediocrity" on offense is actually a sign of wisdom.


exactly...it's called managing around your weaknesses. there is no magic pill that will fix this offense, the only solution is to dump Crowton (and others?) at the end of the year.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:23 pm to
That's not what they're doing. That explains why they're starting JJ. It doesn't explain why they suck.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

the only solution is to dump Crowton (and others?) at the end of the year.


What in the world are you trying to say? Is the offensive coaching staff good or bad? Is Gary Crowton good or bad?

The argument that Gary Crowton is actually a good coach, considering that he has to manage the offense around the fact that Gary Crowton is the OC, makes no sense whatsoever.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

It doesn't explain why they suck.


there are many reasons why they suck...most having to do with Crowton. But the team has to live with these during the season. So you can either start tinkering in order to try something else that might work, or you can do whatever you have to do to win games. If you have a solid defense then you dial back the offense to limit mistakes. When you do this it becomes predictable and easy to defend.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

The argument that Gary Crowton is actually a good coach, considering that he has to manage the offense around the fact that Gary Crowton is the OC, makes no sense whatsoever.


I've never made the argument, in 4 years, that Crowton is a good coach...hence using the term "staff" in making this point. I've had employees do a great job managing a mess they created...it's not a difficult concept.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 3:35 pm to
Okay. But that's a defense of some decisions taken by Miles. Great. It just has nothing to do with the issue of this thread, which is whether or not it's fair to judge LSU's QBs as being responsible for the poor performance of the offense.

They may be below the average historical benchmark for LSU's usual talent level at the position, but it's not fair to judge them for being the reason the offense is underperforming. There is no way to judge them as being inferior to SEC competition based on watching them play under Crowton's dysfunctional circus. Another coach would likely have LSU's offense near the top of the conference even with them.

That's the whole point of the thread. Miles's strategy on how to deal with the problem once the season has already started has nothing to do with it.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram