- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU has faced 3 of the nations top 5 rushers
Posted on 12/18/11 at 1:50 pm to TheDoc
Posted on 12/18/11 at 1:50 pm to TheDoc
quote:
That 100 degree heat, just from being down in Texas then in those days leading up to the game, when we were down there, must of really dried our boys out.
This is a meaningless complaint. Your team did not practice outside, it did what? walk from the stadium to a bus, from a bus to a hotel. What else were these players doing outside? If LMJ and Barner decided to go for a 2pm jog in the Texas heat then they are dumb as frick.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 1:53 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
I was meaning last years UO team.
WTF.
exactly.
To recap:
I've posted a bunch of nonsense in this thread and now that it has been pointed out I want everyone to know I was talking about last year's Oregon team, not the one LSU beat this year which is the only meaningful reason for me to even be on this board....
But I was just talking about last year, not this one
WOWZERS
Posted on 12/18/11 at 1:55 pm to TexasTiger1185
quote:
I was meaning last years UO team.
Stay out of the past man. By the way you lost to an SEC team last year too. And if Cam hadn't fumbled (using your reasoning of just randomly taking turnovers out of a game) then Oregon wouldn't have even been close to winning that game. And if your defense hadn't forced turnovers (again using your reasoning of taking turnovers out of a game) then Oregon likely wouldn't have even been in the National Championship last year.
See how stupid it sounds when you just take meaningful stats out of a game to make your team look better?
Posted on 12/18/11 at 1:56 pm to philcfree
quote:
You play miserable defenses week in and week out, so of course he has inflated rushing numbers, he rarely gets hit.
You play miserable Offense in the SEC so of course that is why your Defense gets inflated stats.
Take Bama. How pathetic can you be when you cannot even score a TD on a team? We had not problem putting up tons of points on LSU. Hell, we even had 4 turnovers. Its hard for any team having 4 turnovers, 3 of which were gift wrapped points as we fumbled near our own end zone, to be able to win ANY game. And even though we lost all those opportunities, we still scored the most points on you then any team, including your so called NFL like SEC teams, lol.
LSU, Bama not having the Offensive skill enough to score just one single TD when they played. Plus wake me up when the SEC understands what Offense is all about.
p.s. watch and see how many first rounders come from the PAC in a little while for the NFL draft. For you who claim we do not play big boy football.
Typical, retard, as usual...
Posted on 12/18/11 at 1:56 pm to TexasTiger1185
isn't lamichael james from texas? shouldn't he know what texas heat is like and know how to prepare for games in texas heat? seems like a shitty excuse to me.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:00 pm to DucksflyinPAC
tons of points
7 of those were with 13 seconds left and the game well in hand.
3 more came off a miscommunication snap when the QB wasn't looking. thats 10 of your 27 right there.
another 3 came off a terrible punt by wing on a drive that started at the 50.
yeah that sounds like no trouble scoring tons of points. when 13 of them were virtually gift wrapped to you.
7 of those were with 13 seconds left and the game well in hand.
3 more came off a miscommunication snap when the QB wasn't looking. thats 10 of your 27 right there.
another 3 came off a terrible punt by wing on a drive that started at the 50.
yeah that sounds like no trouble scoring tons of points. when 13 of them were virtually gift wrapped to you.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:01 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
You play miserable Offense in the SEC so of course that is why your Defense gets inflated stats.
I'm pretty sure this thread has a title that proves LSU has played good offenses this year. Also playing WVU and their passing attack.
quote:
We had not problem putting up tons of points on LSU.
One of your TD's came in the final seconds when the game was in hand and starters were sitting on the bench. Go ahead and count that because it's in the books, but it ain't very exciting.
This post was edited on 12/18/11 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:05 pm to DucksflyinPAC
arkansas and UGA both have good offenses, against real defenses and we held both to 20 points under their averages.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:31 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Jackwagon
Jackwagon?
I left a link to show you the play by play that proves he played in the 2nd half and you call me jackwagon? I'm sorry I had proof you're wrong. Next time I'll just believe every little thing you say.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:47 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
You play miserable Offense in the SEC so of course that is why your Defense gets inflated stats
Once again, in caps...
WHY IS OREGON'S TWO WORST OFFENSIVE OUTPUT OF THE LAST TWO SEASONS AGAINST SEC DEFENSES? WHY DO THE PAC 10/BIG 12/BIG 10 OFFENSES RUN INTO A BRICK WALL IN THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME EVERY YEAR?
Just for fun, let's watch that stout Stanford defense against Oklahoma St and see how tough the defenses that Oregon racks up stats against really is.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:52 pm to chimneylooker
The problem is this Ducks fan seems to think he can simply project LMJ's stats against other teams to the LSU game.
This couldn't be further from the truth.
LMJ had TWO less carries against us than his season average - and we all know what his stats were.
More carries would not have resulted in more success. LSU did not get worn down the way that other teams do.
This couldn't be further from the truth.
LMJ had TWO less carries against us than his season average - and we all know what his stats were.
More carries would not have resulted in more success. LSU did not get worn down the way that other teams do.
This post was edited on 12/18/11 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:58 pm to Choupique19
Lsu was looking forward to learning from probably the highest ranked offense the first game this year. But for some reason y'all didn't show up???! You got back on track the next game though! I wonder why the SEC doesn't have the highlight reel offenses! Take a gander at what SEC teams score against other conferences.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 3:07 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
I was meaning last years UO team
Dude just stop, you have no argument here.
First you say LMJ gets most of his yards in the second half, stats show he has 987 yards in the first half THIS year (which is all that matters) as opposed to 659 in the second. So then you want to say you meant last years UO team. Last year he had 843 yards in the first and 888 in the second, not that much of a difference.
You say James would have had around 150yrds if he played the whole game, why? because UO wears teams down and then takes over in the 2nd half? Have you not watched any CFB this year?
This LSU team is deeper than any team in the country and they dont get worn down. Its our depth on D that makes us so dominant. Teams can't play 4 quarters with us. They stay with us for a quarter or two, then get owned in the 2nd half (just like UO)
The only team that could play 4 quarters with us, Bama, got destroyed in OT.
So keep making excuses for why your star RB was held to only 54 yards, but you are only making yourself look like more of an idiot. And wether you and your little duck buddies watch the game Jan. 9th or not, the outcome will be the same. Hopefully we will see yall in Miami next year so you can make more excuses why yall lost to an SEC team, again.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 3:31 pm to LSUFTW
He sure does like to assume things
Posted on 12/18/11 at 4:13 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
d. Plus wake me up when the SEC understands what Offense is all about.
Really? Newsflash!!! Defense wins championships...which explains why the sec has won the last 5, (soon to be 6), National Championships! Which is the ultimate goal of every college football program in the country, not playing a certain style of football that may get players drafted, as you imply.... its just an inarguable fact that the SEC is way ahead of the rest of the country in college football.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 4:26 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
DucksflyinPAC
40-27
Posted on 12/18/11 at 4:51 pm to Thunder Tiger
I knew all I needed to know about this Oregan fanboy when I called his bluff on the TV ratings and he suddenly disappeared.
All quack.
All quack.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 5:07 pm to Pauldean
Somebody ban this Oregon moron. It's comical to read what this idiot is posting. Hey Oregon boy, You'll probably have more playground-like excuses when lousy Wisconsin wears y'all out in the Rose bowl.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 5:12 pm to DucksflyinPAC
Gimme a break with the first game bullshite, we have backs that have played in their first games against SEC ds and haven't lost fumbles so go somewhere else with that shite. Recruit better backs just like bama needs to
Recruit better kickers. It's a part of the game jerkoff!
Recruit better kickers. It's a part of the game jerkoff!
Popular
Back to top


2





