- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU has faced 3 of the nations top 5 rushers
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:26 am to DucksflyinPAC
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:26 am to DucksflyinPAC
and we were without our starting QB who prepped the whole off-season as number 1 and a starting WR. Go cry somewhere else.
0
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:44 am to DucksflyinPAC
Shoulda, woulda, coulda.
Is your aunt also your uncle?
There's no shame in saying you got whipped, like 12 others. Your corch admitted it and said those are a different kind of players than what he usually sees.
I hope UO gets a chance at redemption soon. They are a great SOS and respect booster, and losing to LSU really didn't hurt UO much this year.
Is your aunt also your uncle?
There's no shame in saying you got whipped, like 12 others. Your corch admitted it and said those are a different kind of players than what he usually sees.
I hope UO gets a chance at redemption soon. They are a great SOS and respect booster, and losing to LSU really didn't hurt UO much this year.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 2:50 am to dbbuilder79
quote:
As for the fumbles?? Who leads the nation in turnovers? Just look at the stats if you want to keep calling them flukes or shouldn't have happened. They did happen b/c that's what our defense does really well.
I think you missed where I made note of that in my statement saying...
quote:
I will not suggest LSU did not have any skill at stripping the ball however, as indeed you all are very good at that.
Last year we were a turnover machine like you are this year only we probably had 3 times the strips and 5 times the pics as you do this year. So I do understand the skill it is at turnovers. However I know you are very good at it this year, that is why I freaking said so dumb-shite.
Perhaps you can remember last years title game where we caused a late game strip against Cam Newton that put us back in the game with AU. Now was it skill in stripping? Yep, been doing that all season long. But was it also terrible ball holding by Cam Newton? Yes it was. If you watched, he was holding the ball low and out like a loaf of bread. Cam Newton's ball holding made it easy to strip. Just like this year in DAT, making it very easy for LSU to strip him.
All I am suggesting is that LMJ would not of allowed your players to strip it from him. And with LMJ in there, no turnover happen, points probably get scored by us = Oregon in a big route.
I have never once tried to rob that great win of LSU's vs us however. You won, we lost. Your in the Natty. We are not. So good luck vs Bama.
One can observe or point out why their team lost while at the same time of not trying to rob the other team of their win. And I don't think most of you guys get that. Personally, I am over it and I don't care. I never brought it up. But sense you do, I am going to make it factual. And anyone with half a brain can point out very easily why Oregon lost and LSU won. Oregon fumbled the ball near their own endzone gift wrapping LSU with a easy win.
And as one other LSU fan said we are like Gumps. Well, no, the scoreboard said LSU beat my team. Unlike gumps I never claimed we beat you, or even tried to rob you of your win, and I never even was the one that brought up our game. It is rantarded LSU fans that just like to assume a UO fan is attempting to do this(Like Bama fans).
We did had more yardage then you, even while gift wrapping fumbles near the end zone giving you easy scores, we still had more yardage then you. However, a game is decided by the scoreboard, not yardage. Thus we lost. Scoreboard says so. And I care less. But having to educate dumb.frickers as to the "why" it happened, and seeing Rantarded LSU fans just assume things gets old.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 3:13 am to DucksflyinPAC
Our starting quarterback wasn't even in the state of Texas for that game. Get your lame arse excuses outta here.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 3:14 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
And with LMJ in there, no turnover happen, points probably get scored by us = Oregon in a big route.
this is where you lose me. so you guys were just scoring at will on us with LMJ in there?
Posted on 12/18/11 at 3:23 am to LSUROCKS52
LMAO...Hippy Ore fans and redneck Bama fans unite. Both didn't lose they just beat themselves 
Posted on 12/18/11 at 5:55 am to DucksflyinPAC
Holy shite... So you would've blown us out without our takeaways? Lol we held you to 20 meaningful points with our starters and somehow would've gotten blown out
I guess you would've blown out USC too in overtime if you'd only made that field goal.
I guess you would've blown out USC too in overtime if you'd only made that field goal.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 6:49 am to DrTyger
not to mention our D has to face our rbs in practice. thats gotta count for something too!
Posted on 12/18/11 at 7:14 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
DucksflyinPAC
:beatdeadhorse: GTFOThis post was edited on 12/18/11 at 7:15 am
Posted on 12/18/11 at 7:28 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
DucksflyinPAC
The butthurt is strong in this one.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 7:30 am to DucksflyinPAC
Ducksflyinpacks you are not pointing out facts your making guesses that if this than that. Fact is Lamichael played. It was the first game of the year. So did Barner. Facts are he didn't scratch his arse vs LSU.
Whatever excuses or what ifs you want to make don't matter. The only facts about that game are in the box score.
Whatever excuses or what ifs you want to make don't matter. The only facts about that game are in the box score.
This post was edited on 12/18/11 at 7:41 am
Posted on 12/18/11 at 7:49 am to tadelatt
Most RBs stayed in the game and took what LSU was giving. They may have lost the game but they were not losers or quitters.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 7:49 am to tadelatt
Most RBs stayed in the game and took what LSU was giving. They may have lost the game but they were not losers or quitters.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 8:15 am to kennymorgan
quote:
They may have lost the game but they were not losers or quitters.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 8:28 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
LMJ of Oregon did not play the whole virtual second half and some of the first half because of getting nasty craps and a ankle injury due to having it stepped on bad. Thus we will never know how many yards he would of got vs you if he had been able to play and not be injured...
Well, I can tell you how many he would have had. LaMichael James has 222 caries this year in 11 games (he missed 2 with injury). He's averaging 20 carries a gam and 7.4 yards a carry.
Agains LSU he averaged 3.0 yards a carry on 18 carries.
So what would LMJ have gained if he played as much as he usually does? Two extra carries = +6 yards = 60 yards.
To the Gump: You're right, it was 89 yards for TR. Website I checked the first time had the wrong numbers. I'll update the OP.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 8:42 am to DrTyger
If LMJ played us 10 times he be knocked out of the game in 5 of them and rush for 54 in other 5. Most unimpressive runner I saw this year that is so highly regarded. He has NO ability in between the tackles, is probably clueless in an I formation, whoever drafts him is getting a shorter less athletic Reggie Bush.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 8:52 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
DucksflyinPAC
Man just STFU if we played ya'll ten times we would beat ya'll all ten times. We fricking dominated the second half it wouldn't have mattered who ya'll had running the ball.
Posted on 12/18/11 at 8:57 am to Choupique19
Ducky, this sounds like sour grapes. I am truly sorry as I liked Oregon. I enjoyed the game & watched them all season.Good luck in the bowl. 
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:19 am to DrTyger
quote:
So what would LMJ have gained if he played as much as he usually does? Two extra carries = +6 yards = 60 yards
Sir, are you a retard?
LMJ left the game injured in the middle of the second quarter. He did not play the whole virtual second half. I say virtual because he returned the first kickoff in the 2nd half but after that return attempt he came limping off and never returned. His cramping was just too bad for him that day and his ankle got messed up by being stepped on by a LSU player.
Thus, he only played in 35 percent, give or take, of that game. So you only adding 2 carries is RETARDED, or RANTARDED as usual.
LMJ lead the nation in rushing for the 2nd straight time. But did you know that he probably gets two thirds of all his yards in the second half? So if he got the yardage that he did by only playing a little, imagine him playing the whole game due to not getting injured. He would of had around 150 yards on you and he would not of got the ball stripped such as our others who were filling in for him. LSU would not of got those easy 21 points, plus UO would of maybe got more points by not having those turnovers happen and would of scored some more. Oregon wins big when they lean on LMJ. Having the Nations leading Rusher for 2nd straight year- it is no clue why so...
Personally, I could care less. But you all bought it up. The scoreboard said LSU won, and I go by the scoreboard of who is the winner. I have been over the loss for a long time now. But I am not going to sit back and watch rantards who have no clue go off about things they have not a clue about...
Posted on 12/18/11 at 9:24 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
But I am not going to sit back and watch rantards who have no clue go off about things they have not a clue about...
but ... but...
Page 3 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News