Started By
Message

re: LSU -3 this weekend

Posted on 8/31/21 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by jbraua
Oklahoma City, OK
Member since Oct 2007
6790 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Johnson throws for almost 400 yards in the simulations


Holy hell would I be happy with this.
Posted by Frogman93
Member since Jul 2021
1569 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Holy hell would I be happy with this.

If max has to throw for 400 yards to win, something seriously went wrong elsewhere. Either RBs shite the bed or defense pulled a 2020
Posted by tigahlovah
virginia beach, va
Member since Oct 2009
3283 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 12:54 pm to
I got $1500 on LSU -3.5, (along with a handful of big boys playing girl's schools money line) in a parlay to return me $1640.
Posted by LSUstephen17
Houston
Member since Aug 2010
13112 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 12:58 pm to
The line will close at LSU -4 to -4.5, do if youre betting get it in ASAP
Posted by Crumblingcountry
Member since Jul 2021
559 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 2:00 pm to
Thanks. I'm guessing you are tied to Vegas books and have inside scoop. Thanks again.
Posted by evangelfan
LA
Member since Apr 2008
1054 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 3:46 pm to
All joking aside, in sports odds making, history has usually shown us when you’re thinking easy “beer” money, and a line that looks so apparently off to us (amateur-public), we’re usually on the wrong side of that bet. Those odds makers are so ridiculously accurate!

But I’m so perplexed over what they’re seeing in this one to have us (or any of the premier sec teams) -3 to any pac 12 team on the road or not. They don’t make their decisions on last year’s performance, etc like column writers. They collect a lot of much more current and relative info and data, and have many contacts that poor into some very advanced prognostication formulas. They don’t just watch the flow and size and timing of wagers, they look at who’s making the big ones to help them to understand the edge.

I don’t even see them and what they run matching up well with virtually any of the key math up indicators, on either side of the ball, much less athletically. You’d think that we would literally need to have major breakdowns in scheme, tackling and turnover problems for this to be within 7. I see this as being a fairly high scoring game, but I still see this being closer to a two score difference than -3. Does anyone have any objective thoughts on what they’re seeing here at -3?


Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56191 posts
Posted on 8/31/21 at 3:55 pm to
LSU -3, in my opinion it will be free money.

Boutte will feast, Nabors will make a highlight reel play, Cole Taylor will move the chains...we will run enough to keep them honest.

Defensively we will shut down that run. When they go to pass they will not be able to block BJ or Ali.

LSU 31 UCLA 20.
Posted by jbraua
Oklahoma City, OK
Member since Oct 2007
6790 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 3:17 pm to
What a difference a year makes.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram