Started By
Message

re: Louisville potentially interested in Wade

Posted on 1/26/22 at 10:57 am to
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290832 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 10:57 am to
Wade’s boss asked to meet with him & Wade said no. Of course he was suspended.

Then when the dust settled, Wade even agreed to amend his contract because he knew he was wrong.
Posted by Robert E
BR
Member since Mar 2018
387 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:20 am to
No, just stating your personal opinion which is as valuable as a bull’s arse with the runs. Just cuz Dale never won one in 25 years doesn’t mean Wade won’t given 10 years or so. I was there also when Dale would melt every time Knight owned him. Great motivator, pitiful coach. He could’ve won if he would ever listen to his talented assistants. But he would run em off because his paranoia perceived them as threats instead of assets. The only ones who would stay were Abernathy and Jones because they were yes men only.
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
12105 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Great motivator, pitiful coach.


I can't stand you people.
Posted by Tigercowboy
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
5092 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:25 am to
Wade didn't say no. Wade requested to have is attorney present since his boss at the time had LSU's attorneys present. I don't blame Wade one bit for wanting to have his attorney present. He was a witness in a Federal Court Case and he was limited on what he could say to his employer about said case.

Wade was smart to wait to have the conversation with his attorney present. Much like when Herman spurned him Joe got mad and hired O. When Wade requested his attorney be present Joe and F King got pissed and suspended him.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290832 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:52 am to
quote:

I don't blame Wade one bit for wanting to have his attorney present.


And that’s fine.

If you were a rational person, you wouldn’t blame the AD for having to suspend him in the same vain
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290832 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 11:54 am to
Also, Nate oats or mussselman make more sense for louisville

Posted by RazzleDazzle
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2018
1426 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

I clearly differentiate opinion and fact. My opinion is he will never win a natty. The fact is that he has been on the bench for one NCAA trny win at LSU.


I am sure going to miss you when you get a job.
Posted by Tigercowboy
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
5092 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 12:29 pm to
No as a rational person you allow him to have his attorney present.
Posted by Robert E
BR
Member since Mar 2018
387 posts
Posted on 1/26/22 at 1:51 pm to
BTW, WTF is infactuation anyhow? You must be one of the 3 or 4 million who claim to have graduated from Bama during football season. A week ago or so you claimed you wished no ill towards Wade and swore fealty to Dale Brown. Now you degrade Wade every chance you get while still supporting Dale. Supporting Dale is fair enough, he was a decent coach for 15 years or so, yet now you bash the current coach and proclaim him incapable of success after 5 successful years. I’ve been attending Tiger games since Pete was a jv in the cow palace. I’ve been through the highs and lows (lots of these under Brown) but you take the cake. After five years you can state as Fact Wade will never win a natty. Go hang out on a corner in St.Aug and spew lies to the locals who know you’re the local joke. The rest of us will cheer for the tigers to win and support our successful, young, and upwardly mobile coach who wants to be here. Hopefully to a natty you think is impossible.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram