- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LM on the two QB "system"
Posted on 10/12/10 at 7:01 pm to dgnx6
Posted on 10/12/10 at 7:01 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Stop trying to bash a player that has helped us win
Not bashing anyone, dgnx6. It is the way I see what has happened on the field. Mr. Jefferson's play has been a major liability. Have you been watching the games? He is ineffective at QB thus far, beginning last season if you like.
I would like to see LSU win. I think the odds of that are much smaller when Mr. Jefferson takes snaps...
Posted on 10/12/10 at 7:06 pm to TexasTiger08
Play pass works only if the QB CAN PASS. No. 9 cannot.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 7:06 pm to Choctaw
quote:
How many TDs did he run for against UF....and one was called down, which he wasn't. Jefferson does bring something to the offense....the defense has to account for him. With that said...Lee should get the majority of the snaps.
This!
Posted on 10/12/10 at 8:21 pm to White Tiger
I am against a 2 QB system; however, I think that we must give credit to our coach (whether you like him or not). He has done an excellent job not alienating either QB. As stated 1,000 times already, we are limited at QB. He is avoiding the delay of game penalties and unnecessary timeouts that I expected with the 2 QB system by avoiding changing QBs every other play.
Whether you like him or not,
coach.
Whether you like him or not,
Posted on 10/12/10 at 8:33 pm to hophead
quote:
He has done an excellent job not alienating either QB.
give me a fricking break, these are college athletes. You play the best player. He's an idiot, and we are very, very lucky it hasn't cost us a game.
Posted on 10/12/10 at 8:39 pm to LSUmomma
quote:Yeah, it's called the wildcat formation. Ingram and Richardson both do, why not ours?
I did't know that the RBs were taking snaps from center now?
Posted on 10/12/10 at 8:42 pm to TigerBait1127
The reason I do not like the two QB system is you limit a QB like JL. With JJ you really don't know pass or run but with JL he isn't going to run most likely.
I think it tips the opposing D when JL comes in. If he were to play an entire game the D would be a little more cautious to load up. By playing JL on alternating drives you give the D an advantage over playing JL an entire game to open up his play book.
I think it tips the opposing D when JL comes in. If he were to play an entire game the D would be a little more cautious to load up. By playing JL on alternating drives you give the D an advantage over playing JL an entire game to open up his play book.
Posted on 10/13/10 at 8:24 am to Touchdowns4LSU
quote:
think it tips the opposing D when JL comes in. If he were to play an entire game the D would be a little more cautious to load up.
If you keep him in the whole time, it doesnt allow a D Coord to swap his personnel with ours...Thats why shep should get all of JJ's snaps...he is in the game, you put Jlee out wide left or right and have shep run the zone read (like he has always done, Not QB ISO) So, now the d cant swap our there D when JJ runs in the game, they go from Nickel and Dime packages with lee to Loading the box with JJ....
And Shep would run the zone read a thousand times better then JJ...its a win win situation....why our coaches dont see this is beyond me...
Posted on 10/13/10 at 9:47 am to White Tiger
quote:
You saying that Ridley or another RB on the team cannot run as well as Mr. Jefferson.
I never said that...i said it gives them another running option.
quote:
Know this, he would not make that fade to Toliver in 100 attempts...
Nah...maybe 20.
Popular
Back to top


0






