- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Little things on offense that are encouraging
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:14 pm to CptBengal
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:14 pm to CptBengal
quote:I've been posting earlier today, but I just noticed this thread.
So why do you post under an alter anyway....didn't want to mess with your other e-persona, huh counselor?
CptBengal, you are a dumbass.
However, I will give you a chance to redeem yourself. You have a choice:
(1) publicly acknowledge on this board your status as a moron, and you will not be a dumbass; or
(2) go to the Help Board and ask them if I am justustm2. If you are right that I am justustm2, then I will never post on this site again. If you are wrong that I am justustm2, then you will never post on this site again.
What is your choice, dumbass?
2
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:15 pm to CptBengal
quote:
did you provide the answer to the question asked? Don't bother responding, we both know the answer.
The question asked was both incorrect (as we had no RB rush for 100 yards against UO) and irrelevant.
If we have one guy that rushed for 250 yards or three guys that rush for 250 yards, the total rushing amount is still 250 yards.
But, to answer your completely irrelevant question, twice last year we had to rushers gain over 100 yards individually - Tennessee and Texas A&M.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:17 pm to just me
quote:
I've been posting earlier today, but I just noticed this thread.
and did I claim he was you?
me thinks an attorney of your amazing stature would have better reading comprehension.
So wouldn't that make you the dumbass?
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:19 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
The question asked was both incorrect (as we had no RB rush for 100 yards against UO)
i rounded up by a couple yards :ohnoz!:
quote:
and irrelevant.
why?
quote:
the total rushing amount is still 250 yards.
would you like to talk about total yards from scrimmage? I think, just as JustClown found out that such an argument doesn't help JJ very much...but we can look at those numbers if you want.
quote:
twice last year we had to rushers gain over 100 yards individually - Tennessee and Texas A&M.
thanks.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:20 pm to jrich11
quote:
6-10 on 3rd down, resulted in 4 first downs. including his td.
that's the difference from a year ago.
It would be if it were true. But as usual the true facts say something else. LSU converted 6 of 15 third downs for 40% All of last year LSU converted 70 of 184 for 38.04%.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:20 pm to justustm2
Well this was a good thread for a while
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:23 pm to just me
So that was what he was saying? He had lsot me>
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:24 pm to justustm2
quote:
But as usual the true facts say something else.
yes they do.
quote:
LSU converted 6 of 15 third downs for 40%
all led by JL.
quote:
All of last year LSU converted 70 of 184 for 38.04%.
How many of those 70 successful conversions were JL and which were JJ?
The difference is that if one is statistically better than the other, the 2010 number may be inflated.
Or we can talk about the meaningless and absurdly small sample size of one game against a top 5 opponent versus the average across an entire season? Which way would you like to go...
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:25 pm to CptBengal
quote:
and did I claim he was you?
Yes. You did.
quote:
So why do you post under an alter anyway....didn't want to mess with your other e-persona, huh counselor?
quote:
JustStop
quote:
JustStop
quote:You have zero integrity if you deny that you thought he was me. Don't be a crawfishing little bitch and a dumbass. Make a choice.
JustStop
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:27 pm to CptBengal
quote:
why?
Because regardless of how many backs we use, the sign of a powerful rushing game is total rushing yards.
Would you rather an offense that has one back that runs for 105 yards a game or an offense that has three backs who rush for a combined 280 yard per game?
quote:
would you like to talk about total yards from scrimmage?
We can.
Our offense against UO gained 273 total yards which is about 100 yards less than our average from last year (371.7 yards a game). We failed to gain 273 total yards three times last season - Mississippi State, West Virginia, and Auburn.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:28 pm to CptBengal
quote:
All of last year LSU converted 70 of 184 for 38.04%.
quote:
How many of those 70 successful conversions were JL and which were JJ?
I take it you didn't watch the Maryland game last night.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:29 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Or we can talk about the meaningless and absurdly small sample size of one game against a top 5 opponent versus the average across an entire season? Which way would you like to go
Add in the SEC including Auburn, Alabama, Mississippi State, Arkansas and Florida and you have a deal. Now I will side with you on the meaningless and absurdly small sample size.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:29 pm to CptBengal
CptBengal,are you there?
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:31 pm to just me
quote:
huh counselor?
I know your ego is irrationally large, but you aren't even the only lawyer posting in this thread.
quote:
JustStop
Like it? This is my new go to end phrase for all the race card players who claim all criticism for JJ is racial....I did it has an homage to your e-persona and undying support for JJ.
I was hoping you would like it.
quote:
You have zero integrity if you deny that you thought he was me.
I thought he could be....definitely an alter though. You claim he is not, but based on your legal "interpretations" over the last few weeks, I doubt anything you post is true.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:32 pm to justustm2
quote:He's not very bright.
So that was what he was saying? He had lsot me>
He tries really hard to argue like a big boy, but he mostly comes off as a silly and harmless little dog. He's all bark and no bite. He is, however, extremely amusing. I love reading his posts.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:33 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
the sign of a powerful rushing game is total rushing yards.
then wouldn't the sign of a powerful offense be total yards?
quote:
Our offense against UO gained 273 total yards which is about 100 yards less than our average from last year (371.7 yards a game). We failed to gain 273 total yards three times last season - Mississippi State, West Virginia, and Auburn.
2008 we had significantly more yards from scrimmage than 2009 or 2010.
your point?
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:34 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Like it? This is my new go to end phrase for all the race card players who claim all criticism for JJ is racial....I did it has an homage to your e-persona and undying support for JJ.
Will you use it also for those who claim none of the criticism is? And for those what card are they playing?
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:37 pm to CptBengal
Let me see if I can follow the irrational mind of a dumbass.
First, you deny thinking he was me:
You are fricking hysterical. I am laughing my arse off.
First, you deny thinking he was me:
quote:Second, you try to explain it away:
and did I claim he was you?
me thinks an attorney of your amazing stature would have better reading comprehension.
So wouldn't that make you the dumbass?
quote:Third, you try to rationalize and justify your erroneous conclusion:
I know your ego is irrationally large, but you aren't even the only lawyer posting in this thread.
quote:Fourth, you realize that you can no longer deny your dumbassery, but you still try to justify it:quote:Like it? This is my new go to end phrase for all the race card players who claim all criticism for JJ is racial....I did it has an homage to your e-persona and undying support for JJ.
JustStop
I was hoping you would like it.
quote:
I thought he could be....definitely an alter though. You claim he is not, but based on your legal "interpretations" over the last few weeks, I doubt anything you post is true.
You are fricking hysterical. I am laughing my arse off.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:47 pm to CptBengal
quote:
then wouldn't the sign of a powerful offense be total yards?
Yes, in most cases.
quote:
2008 we had significantly more yards from scrimmage than 2009 or 2010.
I wouldn't say significantly.
2008:
Total - 4785 Total yards; 5.4 yards per play
Passing - 2617 passing yards; 6.7 yards per attempt
Rushing - 2168 rushing yards; 4.3 yards per attempt
2009:
Total - 3969 total yards; 5.1 yards per play
Passing - 2363 passing yards; 7.0 yards per attempt
Rushing - 1596 rushing yards; 3.6 yards per attempt
2010:
Total - 4461 total yards; 5.3 yards per play
Passing - 2023 passing yards, 6.7 yards per attempt
Rushing - 2438 rushing yards; 4.5 yards per attempt.
Best rushing offense was 2010. Best passing offense was 2009. Best overall offense was statistically 2008, but it was only .1 yards per play better than 2010.
This, of course, doesn't take into account the circumstances each offense played under. 2008 got to play from way down five times in 2008. 2009 and 2010 never played from behind by more 14 points.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 1:51 pm to Fabius
Africkingmen
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News