Started By
Message

re: Lack of Harlem Berry

Posted on 12/29/25 at 10:13 am to
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33547 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Again, specifically at what point would getting berry touches have actually made a difference? Do we really think not rotating Berry back in cost us the game? If so, when? Did we have a RB problem last night?

This seems to be yet another unproductive dig at the previous coaching and regime.



What?

Berry had 3 carries for 45 yards.

All other rushes combined for 21 carries and only 32 yards.

Houston's best running back got 16 carries for 126. Even Kewan Lacy got 15 carries against Tulane.

In what world does your best back not get the bulk of the carries? Its absolutely a dig at Frank Wilson and the previous regime. Its one of the most dumb coaching decisions any of us have seen.




Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2059 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 12:03 pm to
That’s one of the most petty game plans I’ve ever seen. It’s clear berry told Wilson he’s not goin with him to miss so Frank limited his carries to prove a point. Guy had no business even coaching that bowl game it’s clear as day he’s been checked out the moment Kiffin basically told him to take a recruiting job or kick rocks. He absolutely tarnished his legacy here
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 12:06 pm
Posted by SmoothBox
Member since May 2023
2450 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Houston's best running back got 16 carries for 126. Even Kewan Lacy got 15 carries against Tulane.


Only game this season berry got 15 or more carries was WKU.

He hasn’t really been a featured back all season.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram