- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If there is no "rematch"...
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:00 am to Tigerik
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:00 am to Tigerik
quote:
I can promise you one thing. If we had lost by 3 in OT they would not be calling it a fluke!
Whether we would or not has no meaning. We would be playing the SECCG and you guys would waiting to play us in the BCSNC. Winner of the 2nd game take all. No diff except who wins the SECC.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:03 am to sug314
quote:
that it's gonna be 2003 all over again.
Did we beat USC at USC in 03?
Nothing the same. imo
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Icongeauxtigers.png)
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:09 am to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Same with us, LSU.... if we don't beat UGA in the SECCG, we won't deserve to play in the NC.
I say this knowing full well no head coach would do such, but I am just trying to make the point..
If you dont earn it on the field, then you dont deserve it. When a game is played, the best team wins THAT DAY. Say we play Bama in the NC and lose, we cant say, "well, we both have 1 loss, so they really are not better than us". Bull, if they win, we lose... Its done, all this if, and, but, bull crap....
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:10 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Same with us, LSU.... if we don't beat UGA in the SECCG, we won't deserve to play in the NC
I kind of agree with you, but the trouble with this thinking is that you'd have a championship game with no one in it.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:15 am to sug314
quote:
If our current resume was any other team in the nation, the media would be promoting them as one of the best ever. But.....LSU has to beat Bama one more time to prove it....
This was true a few years ago, but the prevailing opinions have changed. Now LSU is THAT team that gets the benefit of the doubt, gets to play for the Natty with two losses, gets to play for the Natty even if it loses the SECCG, will be in the preseason top 5. In short, LSU is becoming the team that half the people identify with and the other half despise. Beat Bama and LSU will have morphed into Notre Dame circa 1975.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:25 am to St Augustine
We beat bama AT bama...PERIOD
but but but...
you only beat us by
you only won in ot
we misse four fg
so you really dint beat us.
signed Alabama
but but but...
you only beat us by
you only won in ot
we misse four fg
so you really dint beat us.
signed Alabama
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:26 am to St Augustine
quote:
14-0 greater than 12-1
this plus Alabama only would have 11 wins over FBS schools
So, LSU would have 3 more victories and a head to head over Alabama
SEC winners
Alabama and talking heads can have at it
No one will care or listen..
Case closed...heck it's not even close for debate frankly
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:31 am to TigerMan02
quote:Some how I don't think so...
I wish Shep would have scored that TD or MC17 returned that pick for 6. Shoot, much less Ford stay in bounds. We would not have to listen to any of this.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:38 am to bama1959
quote:
Bama wins the game and we will have an untied undisputed #14.
That was so funny. Seriously.
I spit my coffee on my screen.
I thought you gumps already claimed 14? Wouldn't this be 15 now?
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:54 am to sug314
quote:
it's gonna be 2003 all over again.
14-0>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>11-1
and 9-6
Posted on 12/2/11 at 7:57 am to bama1959
quote:
Whether we would or not has no meaning. We would be playing the SECCG and you guys would waiting to play us in the BCSNC. Winner of the 2nd game take all. No diff except who wins the SECC.
NO, LSU would not be invited
Alabama would get all glory....blee dat!
Posted on 12/2/11 at 8:02 am to sug314
quote:
we r faced with possibly 3 "questionable" BCS crystal balls
bull . fricking . shite. this is one of the most asinine things I've heard someone say on here
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconspank.gif)
Posted on 12/2/11 at 8:04 am to bama1959
quote:
Whether we would or not has no meaning. We would be playing the SECCG and you guys would waiting to play us in the BCSNC.
Hardly.
LSU isn't an entitled school like Bama.
If we had played your weak schedule and lost to you in BR by one point on a fluke call by the refs, the media would be telling us "tough shite, you had your chance...and your coach is a moron".
We would never get the pimping you get.
I still think it is hilarious that Saban will be a guest on Gameday. Basically, ESPN is going to pimp Bama in a game they didn't even earn the right to play it.
That reminds me of USC in 2003. What a bunch of sore losers. LOL
Posted on 12/2/11 at 8:05 am to sug314
quote:Bama nation would be alone in this since the AP also has us as a distinct #1. In '03 USC was AP #1 going into post season. Not the case here since all 60 votes belong to LSU
told some peeps at work today that if we do not play Bama in NC, although we have no control over whom we play, that it's gonna be 2003 all over again. Talking heads still think we wouldn't have beaten USC that year & if we don't beat Bama AGAIN this year, they will say the same. So, in essence, we need to hope for this "rematch" or we r faced with possibly 3 "questionable" BCS crystal balls. Bring Bama on!!
(Although I guess we didn't already beat them, they beat themselves, in their own house....)
Posted on 12/2/11 at 8:06 am to bama1959
quote:
Whether we would or not has no meaning. We would be playing the SECCG and you guys would waiting to play us in the BCSNC. Winner of the 2nd game take all. No diff except who wins the SECC.
And your fan base would be bitching to no avail if the table were turned.. Oh we beat that arse already.. and we absolutely destroyed them in OT..
I still don't understand why LSU gets no credit for what they did in the 5th quarter when they completely took over the game. You didn't do shite on offense, and LSU could have scored a TD if needed at that point.
Posted on 12/2/11 at 8:07 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
I still think it is hilarious that Saban will be a guest on Gameday. Basically, ESPN is going to pimp Bama in a game they didn't even earn the right to play it.
Exactly. ESPN is so biased it is disgusting. I really hate their network and I do my best to avoid it as much as possible.. except for when they have live events.
Say Mississippi St is Alabama this year.. is ESPN gonna have Dan Mullen on game day? Would ESPN be pimping them some Miss st?
This post was edited on 12/2/11 at 8:17 am
Posted on 12/2/11 at 8:14 am to sug314
quote:
I understand we potentially would have 3 crystal balls, but how can we go undefeated, hypothetically, beat all but Bama convincingly not be the unanimous Champ with no "ifs" involved for once? If our current resume was any other team in the nation, the media would be promoting them as one of the best ever. But.....LSU has to beat Bama one more time to prove it....
You make no sense. We beat Bama at their house. You are saying we have to beat Bama in the Dome "convincingly" to be the unanimous Champ?
If we win again by 9-6, that would not make your happy.
Look. If we don't play Bama and beat Okie St/VaTech in the Dome, there will be no doubt we are the champions due to the very fact we beat Bama already.
In 2003, LSU, USC and Okla did not play in the regular season and had very few common opponents. That was the issue. Not this year with LSU and Bama. Plus, Bama had home field.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)