Started By
Message

re: If sec assesses any penalties on Lane or LSU does that trigger LA court contempt?

Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:26 pm to
Posted by tigerbait1.6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2013
4981 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:26 pm to
Might get “postponed”
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
58717 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:32 pm to
You cant pass a bylaw that directly violates a court order, then try to retroactively apply that rule to punish a team.

Hope we have the federal suit ready to file tomorrow AM in a Louisiana district.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
8155 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Not the way I see it.
That case was telling the SEC these guys can play.

What the SEC filed and what this meeting is about is "LSU has lost institutional control" based on the way Lane handled things in the press. This wouldn't be contempt because it is a different matter.
Damn near every allegation in the SEC's Amend Complaint against the LSU Defendants is about the Harris, Wright, and the 19th JDC litigation. Damn near every important document in the 19th JDC litigation was filed into the SEC's case against the LSU Defendants.

Do you really think Sankey can convince Judge Jordan that the SEC is not violating his Preliminary Injunction by taking action today that is directly related to the SEC's lawsuit and the 19th JDC litigation?

If you believe that, you are hugely underestimating Judge Jordan and Tony Clayton.
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
58717 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Might get “postponed”



My guess.. they are gonna try to postpone vote to late next week, to give us the least amount of time to challenge the suspension before 9/19 and impact the most amount of damage to the team/gameplan

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram