- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Crews had initially been called out, would the review have overturned the call?
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:01 am to TigerProphet
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:01 am to TigerProphet
NO! That play was as close as you could get at the plate.
I'm surprised ump didn't call him out. He must not have liked the Kentucky catcher too much.... I'm sure they didn't have a lot to talk about rest of game after that play. LOL
I'm surprised ump didn't call him out. He must not have liked the Kentucky catcher too much.... I'm sure they didn't have a lot to talk about rest of game after that play. LOL
1
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:13 am to josh336
Agree. Had he been called out on the field, the video would have been considered inconclusive/not obvious to over turn IMHO, as it was very difficult to tell when the catcher's glove made contact with the runner.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:14 am to TigerAlum93
The call was confirmed by the review. That means they determined there was conclusive evidence we was safe. I don’t know how some of you aren’t getting this.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:39 am to DrD
If the play was a Wildcat called safe, EVERYONE on this site would have gone ballistic. And with cause because this is a homer site. It’s over and also the constant crying, too, over balls and strikes calls is really caustic. I believe this call was correct after review but to say it’s “clearly” a safe call is amusing. There are bang bang calls in every game and they all are not supposed to be our way but many here think so. Umps blow some and reviews even blow some but we only have to hope they don’t affect the final outcome.
This post was edited on 5/27/22 at 9:43 am
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:40 am to deaux
quote:
The call was confirmed by the review.
This is the telling, and critical, piece of information. The call was not "upheld" meaning that the video didn't show much either way. It was "confirmed" meaning that the video crew saw enough evidence to make the same call of player safe touching the plate before the catcher's mitt made physical contact.
If he had been called out on the field and then gone to review, that determination of "confirmed" means that they would have seen evidence to "OVERTURN" an out call and correctly call Crews safe at home before the tag.
It was a very athletic slide with great body control to roll away from the catcher while still reaching for the plate. Outstanding play from an outstanding player in a big moment. That's what you love to see as a fan. Geaux Tigers!
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:42 am to TigerAlum93
quote:
Had he been called out on the field, the video would have been considered inconclusive/not obvious to over turn
Then the ump would have said play stands not confirmed. Wording from the ref/ump after a replay tells you what they saw.
I think it is pretty obvious that the glove first touches Crew around the belt after he already touched the plate.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 9:43 am to TigerProphet
Not sure about the review but the ump had the best view of the play. He was standing right over Crews when he made the call.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News