- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I Still Stand By The Fact That...
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:44 am to kbro
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:44 am to kbro
quote:
Peterson, Jefferson and Scott were partying till 2 AM on Thursday? Did not know that.
Condon reported it on his radio show, referring to all the 'cramps' some of the players were experiencing. Didn't name JJ or Scott though.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:45 am to TigerinCharlotte
quote:
Game was over once we lost Peterson.
Fixed.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:46 am to JustSmokin
These are good reasons why if he has a great upside which we can all see he does, they should have redshirted him and let him learn... 
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:47 am to JustSmokin
quote:
that had some success.
Actually, USC is a "run first and second" team.
Barkley's numbers are 1839, 10 TD/7 INT, 56% completion rate.
Is that great, or what?
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:47 am to Prominentwon
The fact he could break it open on any given play. I'm not saying every play he should have run the Wildcat. Guys, I gotta believe the kid can throw a damn screen pass!!! I mean c'mon. You telling me he couldn't have thrown a high precentage pass or two!?
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:48 am to mstiger
In truth, the game was over when we didn't get a chance to score when the interception was negated.
It had more to do with opportunity than personnel.
It had more to do with opportunity than personnel.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:50 am to Enadious
quote:
It had more to do with opportunity than personnel.
+1 doesnt matter who was playing down by 9 with 3 minutes to go and no timeouts against a top defensive unit on the road.... i mean really youre pretty much in desperation mode at this moment.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:51 am to TruLsu
"Desperation mode"...ok, sure. So what? You do what it takes to win. IMO.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:52 am to TigerinCharlotte
quote:
The fact he could break it open on any given play. I'm not saying every play he should have run the Wildcat. Guys, I gotta believe the kid can throw a damn screen pass!!! I mean c'mon. You telling me he couldn't have thrown a high precentage pass or two!?
So because he's a homerun threat, that means he should start without knowing the QB position?
So that's two plays that Shep can run. The Wildcat and screen pass.
Does that not handcuff an offense?
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:53 am to TigerinCharlotte
hence we did what the coaches thought. bring in a QB who can throw and let him heave it, it didnt work out. odds are what less than 5% we come back regardless who is at qb... Yea running the ball with no timeouts and 3 minutes, great way to do what it takes to win...
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:53 am to TigerinCharlotte
quote:
You do what it takes to win. IMO.
Like starting a true freshman QB that doesn't know the QB position yet?
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:53 am to Enadious
quote:
Condon reported it on his radio show, referring to all the 'cramps' some of the players were experiencing. Didn't name JJ or Scott though.
Gotcha
Still doesn't change the fact that Bama would not have beaten LSU without McElroy, Ingram and Kirkpatrick.
JJ and Scott weren't injured due to being out drinking on Thursday night.
What I guess you're getting at is that Miles doesn't have the team disciplined enough to take it easy on a Thursday night.
To that I'd say that if Jefferson and Scott weren't injured and the refs don't blow 5 or 6 critical calls, we win the game despite Lord Saban being the genius of all geniuses.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:56 am to tigerfan34
quote:
The funny thing about that is all season people on this forum have been calling for Jarrett Lee to at a minimum play a few series each game....I wonder how many people still believe that.
Then again, had that happened, maybe he would have been better prepared when he was forced to play on the road with the western division championship on the line. Speculation goes both ways.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:56 am to TigerinCharlotte
quote:
#1 recruit in the nation and he's not ready for that? Hmm, ok. If that's true, then the coaches need to get him ready.
You might be on to something.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:57 am to TigerinCharlotte
He would have suffered too. The problem is we need to run the ball.
Just look at Drew Brees. No running game allows the defense to key on the qb. If we can run the ball, then we can talk about the qb.
If you take out the pick sixes last year, our offense and defense for that matter were much better. That killed us.
Just look at Drew Brees. No running game allows the defense to key on the qb. If we can run the ball, then we can talk about the qb.
If you take out the pick sixes last year, our offense and defense for that matter were much better. That killed us.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:58 am to Prominentwon
Like starting a true freshman QB that doesn't know the QB position yet?
Dude, look at what the alternative was, and look at the outcome. And who knows if Shepp doesn't know the position at all? He very well might not. But I have to believe he has some sort of understanding of it. Again, let the kid run a few times out of the "Wildcat" make Bama stop it. Could they have? Maybe so/maybe not. I'm just saying I truly believe Shep would have given us a better chance to win. Again, the kid is such a threat when he has the ball. Who knows what he could have done.
Dude, look at what the alternative was, and look at the outcome. And who knows if Shepp doesn't know the position at all? He very well might not. But I have to believe he has some sort of understanding of it. Again, let the kid run a few times out of the "Wildcat" make Bama stop it. Could they have? Maybe so/maybe not. I'm just saying I truly believe Shep would have given us a better chance to win. Again, the kid is such a threat when he has the ball. Who knows what he could have done.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 9:59 am to kbro
quote:.
What I guess you're getting at is that Miles doesn't have the team disciplined enough to take it easy on a Thursday night
Yeah, I was mainly commenting on the 'cramp' part of your post.
quote:
To that I'd say that if Jefferson and Scott weren't injured and the refs don't blow 5 or 6 critical calls, we win the game despite Lord Saban being the genius of all geniuses.
With Lee and Ridley, I still think we could have won with better time management and play calling.
But maybe not, as the refs blowing calls could have gone to 7 or 8 to cement the Bama win.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 10:00 am to TigerinCharlotte
So yeah, you're saying to start a true freshman QB that doesn't know the position yet.
Wow.
Wow.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 10:00 am to mannybeingmanny
when was the last time a freshman came into the sec and was successful? I don't trust Shep going through receiver progressions fast enough against a team like bama.
Popular
Back to top



2



