- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:54 am to dukke v
quote:While all of this is true, I'll still take the championships over the "we were better that year" argument. That argument is for stat whores and losers.
It was a better team and had better losses. Better QB play and a better D. If you only want to go with Championships, Then LSU backed in to the NC game in 2007 and everybody knows it. NOBODY wanted to play the 2006 team at the end of the year[even FLA] You can't say this about the 2007 team.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:55 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:Because people use the LSU scored more points in their losses in Flynn's losses than in Russell's losses so Flynn is better argument.
You calling people a tard without making an argument for your case is less credible fyi.
No argument is necessary to argue with such blatant stupidity. It's not worth my time.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:55 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
He wasn't great,
he was horrible
sub 50% completion rate a 3.7 YPA? do you realize how utterly horrible 3.7 ypa is?
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:56 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:Russell was better in the Auburn game and he gets CREAMED for that performance.
He wasn't great, but I don't think the game was on him.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:57 am to TheDoc
quote:Normally I agree with you on most things, but this is a weak argument and you know it. The end result if the ultimate determination of success.
2007 had championships and 2006 didn't
2007 = 2 losses to unranked teams, one on road, one at home.
2006 = 2 losses to two top 5 teams on the road, one to the eventual national champion
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It's the receivers' fault. That's always their excuse when bringing up stats.
not against UK. i was actually wrong. we scored 37 points, 10 coming in OT. so we scored 27 points in regulation. nothing amazing
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:57 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
How can you say 2006 was better?
quote:
The defense couldn't stop anyone, even a sad KY team that down the stretch turned out to be way overhyped because of one player.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:57 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
I'll still take the championships over the "we were better that year" argument
championships involve a lot of luck and are not only a team stat, but are based a lot on circumstances
just look at this year and how down the top of CFB is. you put either bama, LSU, or OSU in 2004 and all are in trouble
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:58 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
The end result if the ultimate determination of success.
not all seasons/schedules are equal
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
not against UK. i was actually wrong. we scored 37 points, 10 coming in OT.
Yea. I weas wondering what you were talkin about with the 43 thing. Lets not forget that Scott had over 100 yds in the 1st half of the UK game and didn't see the field in the 2nd half. LSU wins that game if scott keeps totin the rock.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:58 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
Normally I agree with you on most things, but this is a weak argument and you know it.
how is that weak?
isn't that what happened?
quote:
2007 = 2 losses to unranked teams, one on road, one at home.
2006 = 2 losses to two top 5 teams on the road, one to the eventual national champion
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:that's why he needed extra help from the stability that is the LSU football program and family.
no. drive is internal
quote:And they probably had the same flawed safety net and internal support that JR had.
plenty of other 21 year olds stopped working, like JR, when they got to the NFL
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:They choose the "facts are facts" argument in this case but not when discussing actual QB performance. I love it
not all seasons/schedules are equal
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:00 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
that's why he needed extra help from the stability that is the LSU football program and family.
if he didn't have drive by 21 he wasn't going to get it. he put in work, but just enough to be elite in college, on the path to getting paid. once he got paid he lost his drive
quote:
And they probably had the same flawed safety net and internal support that JR had.
we have only ourselves to blame for internal failures
what safety net do you think flynn took to green bay?
This post was edited on 1/2/12 at 11:00 am
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:00 am to dukke v
quote:
Scott had over 100 yds in the 1st half of the UK game and didn't see the field in the 2nd half. LSU wins that game if scott keeps totin the rock.
this has to be one of the biggest mysteries of the last 10 years of LSU football
was he hurt?
did he say something wrong to the coaches?
no one knows
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:00 am to TheDoc
quote:Yes but the SEC and NC championships will be remembered in LSU lore and CFB history forever.
how is that weak?
isn't that what happened?
LSU "losing 2 games on the road but golly gee were were still a great team" is a mere footnote and worthy only of cheerleader posts from the likes of Hot Carl.
This post was edited on 1/2/12 at 11:01 am
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:01 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
While all of this is true, I'll still take the championships over the "we were better that year" argument. That argument is for stat whores and losers.
I agree, but that is not the point of this thread. The OP made the assertion that Flynn was better than JR in college. He was wrong, and it sounds like you are too.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:01 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
That argument is for stat whores and losers.
1st off I am not a stat whore. As for the loser comment. I think you are a tad jealuos cause I am right. There are 5 teams at least that could have beaten 2007 LSU in the NC game. BTW I don't like the BACKING in bullshite. You can't say that about the 2006 team. AND If JR was the QB in 2007, LSU goes unbeaten IMO.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:02 am to Tiger_n_ATL
well it still happened
honestly, LSU should have lost the bama game that year as well due to flynn's horrible play, but the defense bailed him out at the end.
3 int's in the first half I believe...
honestly, LSU should have lost the bama game that year as well due to flynn's horrible play, but the defense bailed him out at the end.
3 int's in the first half I believe...
Page 11 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News