- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hit on Burrow
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:42 pm
Should’ve been a personal foul and targeting call, but only call was the taunting by the other defensive lineman.
Not here to bitch and moan, but the NCAA needs to either do away with the rule completely or make sure the referees can follow the rule
LINK
1) A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
2) Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
1) A player who receives a blind-side block.
2) A quarterback any time after a change of possession.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13660931/burrowhit.gif)
Not here to bitch and moan, but the NCAA needs to either do away with the rule completely or make sure the referees can follow the rule
LINK
quote:
ARTICLE 4. Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player
Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:
1) A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
2) Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
quote:
Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to:
1) A player who receives a blind-side block.
2) A quarterback any time after a change of possession.
14
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:44 pm to Skippy_
No part of the defender ever made contact with the QB's head or neck area, tho.
Signed,
The massive open cut on Burrow's jaw
Signed,
The massive open cut on Burrow's jaw
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:45 pm to Skippy_
There was another camera angle that showed the head-to-head.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:47 pm to shutterspeed
The hit was questionable. But when that fat fricking retard stood over joe and flexed toward the sideline I wanted to come through the tv and fight that fricker.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:47 pm to Skippy_
Targeting by definition all day long. The selective nature of the rule is extremely frustrating.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:47 pm to Federal Tiger
Does that pussy have a twitter account?
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:48 pm to Skippy_
It was a legal block
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:48 pm to Skippy_
Burrow with the last laugh. One tough fricker.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:48 pm to Skippy_
Someone should lose their job over that.
A complete whiff of the rule and what it was intended to do.
A complete whiff of the rule and what it was intended to do.
This post was edited on 1/1/19 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:48 pm to Douboy
Does the SEC review this stuff after the game?
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:50 pm to Federal Tiger
Don’t even care about the hit or targeting. At MINIMUM, it should’ve been PF for taunting and PF for blind side block
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:50 pm to LsuTool
quote:
Does that pussy have a twitter account?
This is the new generations “meet me out back”.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:51 pm to Bandits58
quote:
It was a legal block
Did you not read what I posted dumb frick?
1) BLIND SIDE BLOCK
2) A QB AFTER CHANGE OF POSSESSION
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:51 pm to Skippy_
That’s ok cuz our QB is a badass
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:51 pm to Skippy_
Just because we got fricked on the Devin White call doesn't mean we have to be a pussy about every big hit we receive.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:52 pm to Skippy_
How did those moron refs miss the 2nd targeting call on the field though??? I mean, the rule was specifically made to protect QBs the most and neither was called on the field (and the 2nd one was blatant). It had to come from the review booth. Yet, they pulled the trigger on Delpit's right away and did the fastest review ever. Delpit's was not nearly as vicious and seemed a lot less intentional. I understand why it was called, but come on...
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:52 pm to Skippy_
quote:
At MINIMUM, it should’ve been PF for taunting
There was a PF for taunting.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:52 pm to slackster
Just you,right pussy?
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:52 pm to Skippy_
Could have been a lot worse if #91 had gone low
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:52 pm to Skippy_
Somehow everyone seemed to forget that the rule says: "...head or neck area."
You could argue (wrongly I think) that there was no forcible contact to the head, but CLEARLY there was forcible contact to the "neck area."
I agree with the OP: 1) Absolutely horrible no call and 2) They must change this rule or apply it evenly. (I vote for getting rid of it completely - make it 15 yards, but not an ejection.)
You could argue (wrongly I think) that there was no forcible contact to the head, but CLEARLY there was forcible contact to the "neck area."
I agree with the OP: 1) Absolutely horrible no call and 2) They must change this rule or apply it evenly. (I vote for getting rid of it completely - make it 15 yards, but not an ejection.)
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News