- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harvey Williams at LSU
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:17 pm to The First Cut
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:17 pm to The First Cut
I know but we’re talking NFL
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 9:18 pm
0
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:18 pm to KiwiHead
Yep. D was hilarious to hang with.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:22 pm to Madking
How did I shift the argument. You said 3 different times on page 3 he can’t play TE with that number
quote:
He wasn’t a tight end . He played a little fullback at the end of his career. You’ll never find an instance where he lined up at tight end
quote:
It’s against the NFL rules for a TE or in-line player to wear #22 like Harvey did in Oakland.
quote:
it’s ILLEGAL to line up at TE in the NFL wearing #22!!
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:25 pm to Thorny
I think we had very few 300lbers. Maybe 2 guys used but there is no evidence to support the charge. Everyone likes a story. N definitely spent more time with the iron.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:27 pm to Lester Earl
If you can’t understand that giving the proof of an argument is part of that argument then you’re stupid.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:27 pm to Daygo85
The saying went that on the way to his announcement table, several students were singing the Aggie fight song. Harvey said that pissed him off and he pulled the LSU cap at the last minute
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:28 pm to Madking
You even made sure to distinguish the 2 
quote:
It’s against the NFL rules for a TE or in-line player
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:29 pm to Lester Earl
They’re one and the same dumbass. Boy you sure are coming unraveled here, it’s a sad melt.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:32 pm to Lester Earl
quote:Player Numbers by Position
How did I shift the argument. You said 3 different times on page 3 he can’t play TE with that number
quote:
He wasn’t a tight end . He played a little fullback at the end of his career. You’ll never find an instance where he lined up at tight end
quote:
It’s against the NFL rules for a TE or in-line player to wear #22 like Harvey did in Oakland.
quote:
it’s ILLEGAL to line up at TE in the NFL wearing #22!!
Please read below, especially the portion that has been emphasized in bold print:
(NFL Rule 5, Section 1, Article 4)
All players must wear numerals on their jerseys in accordance with Rule 5, Section 3, Article 3c (see NOTE 1), and such numerals must be by playing position as follows: quarterbacks, punters, and placekickers, 1-19 (and 10-19 for wide receivers if 80-89 are all otherwise assigned); running backs and defensive backs, 20-49; centers, 50-59 (60-79 if 50-59 unavailable); offensive guards and tackles, 60-79; wide receivers and tight ends, 80-89; defensive lineman, 60-79 (90-99 if 60-79 unavailable); and linebackers 50-59 (90-99 if 50-59 unavailable).
If a player changes his position during his playing career in the NFL and such change moves him out of a category specified above, he must be issued an appropriate new jersey number.
Any request to wear a number for a special position not specified above (e.g., H-back) must be made to the Commissioner.
During the preseason period when rosters are larger, the League will allow duplication and other temporary deviations from the numbering scheme specified above, but the rule must be adhered to for all players during the regular season and postseason. Clubs must make numbers available to adhere to the rule, even if it requires putting back into circulation a number that has been retired or withheld for other reasons. See 7-2-3 for reporting change of position. (Note 2)
NOTES:
5, 3, 3c has to do with the size and placement of the numerals
7, 2, 3 rules regarding notifying the referee of eligibility if wearing and ineligible number for a position. Basically, any player wearing an eligible number at a pass receiving position (running backs, tight ends, and wide receivers) can play any eligible pass receiving position without reporting to the referee. That is, running backs can line up as wide receivers or tight ends, and players wearing wide receiver and/or tight end numbers can line up in the backfield without having to report to the referee.
LINK
Strike three, you're out. Grab some pine meathead.
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:34 pm to Curtis Lowe
Nice Freudian slip by responding with those comments to Lester. Sorry but you must not understand you just proved my point not yours
Any request to wear a number for a special position not specified above (e.g., H-back) must be made to the Commissioner.
Do you see which position they’re talking about? You can’t line up as an in-line TE wearing that number, if you could you two morons would’ve flooded this board with examples of it but there are none because it’s ILLEGAL.
Any request to wear a number for a special position not specified above (e.g., H-back) must be made to the Commissioner.
Do you see which position they’re talking about? You can’t line up as an in-line TE wearing that number, if you could you two morons would’ve flooded this board with examples of it but there are none because it’s ILLEGAL.
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:36 pm to Madking
Quite to the contrary, or are you just incapable of reading and comprehending what you have read? Under NFL rules it is legal for #22 to line up at TE.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:37 pm to Curtis Lowe
Lmfao no it doesn’t but you think you can alter reality to mean whatever pleases your sensitive ego.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:38 pm to Curtis Lowe
So give some examples or video evidence. I’ll wait ....
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:39 pm to Curtis Lowe
“Whatever, troll.”
You’ve been broken, instead of proving your argument this is where you went. Thanks for finally admitting you’re wrong.
You’ve been broken, instead of proving your argument this is where you went. Thanks for finally admitting you’re wrong.
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:42 pm to Madking
Post video evidence so that you can call it a lie too??
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:42 pm to Lester Earl
Still waiting..... it takes no effort.....
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:44 pm to Lester Earl
“Any request to wear a number for a special position not specified above (e.g., H-back) must be made to the Commissioner.”
Hmmm... H-Back, that’s exactly what I’ve been saying. You post fake arguments that you can’t support then project your dishonest tactics on to me in a fit of childish anger. All the beat downs you’ve taken here and you’ve learned nothing. You’re a sociopath
Hmmm... H-Back, that’s exactly what I’ve been saying. You post fake arguments that you can’t support then project your dishonest tactics on to me in a fit of childish anger. All the beat downs you’ve taken here and you’ve learned nothing. You’re a sociopath
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:46 pm to Lester Earl
..............................
Posted on 10/15/20 at 9:51 pm to Curtis Lowe
quote:
Under NFL rules it is legal for #22 to line up at TE.
I’m going to go with Maddy on this one. In the 1980s the Saints had Guido Merkins wearing #19. That guy played all over the field. In the NFL you can’t play TE as your primary role and wear 22, but wearing 22 doesn’t preclude you from playing TE.
Page 6 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News