- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hannigrif says Orgeron made Canada makes changes by game 3.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:36 pm to SammyTiger
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:36 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
But O just said the offense was different
It is. But we saw different elements progressing through he season last year too
We all knew the direction they wanted to go with the offense. Particularly things Burrow could do as he gained experience and trust. Burrow is the biggest key to this seasons success. Bar none
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:38 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We all knew the direction they wanted to go with the offense.
Hope they change it the first weekend in a November because that direction wasn’t good.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:41 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I think We wanted to run an RPO heaving Offense.
I dont Think Ensminger bring the expertise necessary to do that.
Saying “oh Burrow wasn’t experienced enough”
He ran RPOs at OSU.
Asking him to under center wasn’t for his comfort level.
I dont Think Ensminger bring the expertise necessary to do that.
Saying “oh Burrow wasn’t experienced enough”
He ran RPOs at OSU.
Asking him to under center wasn’t for his comfort level.
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:41 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Why would E be replaced ? Seems he is all-in on the new offense. And Brady can use 2 or 3 years in his current position without all the extraneous distractions an OC has to deal with.
We don't. At least not this season.
Just on talent and experience we will improve. Now as far as developing QBs down the line we definitely need someone else to step up.
Or, co-OC in '20 would work fine if things go well in '19
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:48 pm to LSU Groupee
quote:
Everyone has soften their stance since Alleva was sent packing. There was the feeling O was here no matter what he did because Alleva was so
Totally forgot about that one. Alleva already feels like a lifetime ago.
Yes, I definitely feel that Alleva was the head coach's security blanket. He would not get rid of the HC under any circumstances IMO.
I think people perform best under pressure, and the HC will definitely be under pressure with a competent AD as his boss. We'll see if he rises to the challenge.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:51 pm to LSU Groupee
quote:
everyone feels better knowing he wins the west or hes gone.
Are you the new AD or is it just wishful thinking?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:52 pm to Madking
quote:
I’m just hoping Brady has as much input as possible
I think he will. Ensminger seems like a great team player
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Ensminger does seem like an LSU first kind of guy.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 5:57 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Are you the new AD or is it just wishful thinking?
Woodward is the real deal, not like that idiot Alleva. He won't put up with any underachieving.
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:05 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Woodward is the real deal,
I guess we will find out. His legacy is Jimbos ridiculous contract with alone sided buyout. He hasn't been responsible for a lot of hardware
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
And Buzz Williams and Peterson at Washington.
He’s a solid AD.
Jim is contract is ridiculous but that’s probably what you have to pay to pull a NC winning HC from a traditional power to A&M
He’s a solid AD.
Jim is contract is ridiculous but that’s probably what you have to pay to pull a NC winning HC from a traditional power to A&M
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:10 pm to SammyTiger
The fact that if Jimbo leaves he owes the university nothing is the worst part of that deal. On the other side, A$M is on the hook for over 60 million right now
Woodward claim to fame is actually fundraising
Woodward claim to fame is actually fundraising
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The fact that if Jimbo leaves he owes the university nothing is the worst part of that deal.
It’s weird but do you know another school that would give Jumbo 7.5 mill a year?
I think it’s a bad contract but that’s but Woodard was told to go get this guy and don’t take no for an answer
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:28 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I guess we will find out. His legacy is Jimbos ridiculous contract with alone sided buyout. He hasn't been responsible for a lot of hardware
His salary's really not that ridiculous when you consider they're the most profitable college football program in the country, by a good margin.
And he has a NC in his trophy case. How is that not a lot of hardware?

Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:32 pm to Goldrush25
quote:.
His salary's really not that ridiculous when you consider they're the most profitable college football program in the country, by a good margin
Jimbo can bolt tomorrow and A$M getsnothing.
quote:
And he has a NC in his trophy case. How is that not a lot of hardware?
Where?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Where?
Is this a trick question or something?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:34 pm to Goldrush25
quote:He's referring to Woodward - no major hardware in Woody's showcase
And he has a NC in his trophy case. How is that not a lot of hardware?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Yea I agree Ensminger is a true blue Tiger. I didn’t mean he’d resist Brady’s input I just mean I hope he can grasp it comfortably and be able to seamlessly include it into the offense.
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:37 pm to Madking
quote:
I didn’t mean he’d resist Brady’s input I just mean I hope he can grasp it comfortably and be able to seamlessly implement it into the offense.
This s is pretty much the only thing I worry about. What happens when we get a nice lead, and will we sit on it and revert to a predictable offens?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 6:38 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
this a trick question or something?
What hardware does Woodward have?
It's a very simple question. Everyone understood but you
Popular
Back to top
