Started By
Message

re: Hannigrif says Orgeron made Canada makes changes by game 3.

Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:50 pm to
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14406 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

I just posted photographical evidence of Canada running a 5 wr set


You do realize that you can find a pic of Miles running the spread, too? I posted multiple pics of Canada's offense with 6-7 OL.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
47442 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Goid. After all your bitching, you just agreed with me.





First Cut I know you're fluent in retard.
can you translate the bolded word for me?
Posted by BayouBengals18
Fort Worth
Member since Jan 2009
9843 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

prove Canada didnt want to change QBs


This is a fact(that MC wanted to play Myles), but O shut it down in preseason camp. Now, was Myles our best chance to win games in 2017? Maybe, maybe not, but Canada saw something he could build an offense around.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:54 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
47442 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

You do realize that you can find a pic of Miles running the spread, too? I posted multiple pics of Canada's offense with 6-7 OL.


then why would you ignorantly claim Canada didn't run 4 wide sets?


its amazing how you cultists get mad when FACTS are posted that shite on your proven football ignorant opinions.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:53 pm
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33833 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:53 pm to
quote:


links and facts to back up your claims....


Right. Why is his explanation any more valid than mine?

Only difference is Shrubs is using one press conference to make his case. I'm using the man's entire career to demonstrate a pattern of behavior.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:54 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
47442 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Right. Why is his explanation any more valid than mine?


right. he is too dim to see that.

and you are even admitting you dont know for a fact and are using past behavior to form your opinion.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283290 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Why is his explanation any more valid than mine?


You have no evidence
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

yeah we have all seen you posting ben



Yeah don't address the content of my post. And either agree or disagree that Saban was a bad comparison based on Saban's history of losing his mind on the sidelines.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33833 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:57 pm to
quote:


You have no evidence




Circumstantial evidence (which you're calling bias for some reason) is there.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283290 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Only difference is Shrubs is using one press conference to make his case


Wrong. I'm using actual data. The offense in game 10, 11, 12, 13 was the same as game one

Now show me how the offense was different. Ths should be easy to do, right? You're absolutely sure of constant meddling, let's see some solid evidence
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
47442 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

You have no evidence





neother do you. he isnt saying it's a fact. you are.


only 2 people in this thread,that I've seen,have claimed their opinion is a fact. you and First cut.
goldfish outright admitted that at least his claim was backed up by past behavior. yours is backed by your personal belief and love for o. you have no idea how much O meddled and again, that was his right
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 5:59 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283290 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Circumstantial evidence


Cool.

Now show me how the offense was affected. Should be easy, right?
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33833 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Now show me how the offense was different. Ths should be easy to do, right? You're absolutely sure of constant meddling, let's see some solid evidence



That's the difference between me and you. I never said I was absolutely sure because we are not privy to all of the information. I never box myself into those type of comments. I'm approaching this discussion from a reasonable standpoint, unlike you.

Taking his entire career into account, I've said it's more likely than not that his involvement in the offense existed beyond the scope of that one game.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 6:02 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283290 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

he isnt saying it's a fact.


This is how I know you lied about reading the thread
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
47442 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

rong. I'm using actual data. The offense in game 10, 11, 12, 13 was the same as game one


prove it.


quote:

Now show me how the offense was different. Ths should be easy to do, right? You're absolutely sure of constant meddling, let's see some solid evidence


you made the claim. o said he meddled. you say ,"not much". so prove it wasnt much Rodger
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14406 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

then why would you ignorantly claim Canada didn't run 4 wide sets?


Would you ignorantly claim Miles ran the spread? Probably not, but at times he did. Canada May have run some spread, but he motioned extra linemen to create an unbalanced line waaaayyyyyy more than 4 WR sets. That was not a new occurrence at LSU.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
214003 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Rickdaddy4188



Why is this thread still going???? Canada is long gone.....


Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283290 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

I've said it's more likely than not that his involvement in the offense existed beyond the scope of that one game.


And I said you're guessing based on a bias.

Which is fact, it bothered you for some reason
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 6:02 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
47442 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 6:01 pm to
thanks for posting formations I never said Canada didnt run. you claimed he didnt run 4 wide sets.

I watched 45 seconds of Pitt Vs Clemson highlights and found him in 5 wide set.


Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14406 posts
Posted on 5/29/19 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

This is a fact(that MC wanted to play Myles), but O shut it down in preseason camp. Now, was Myles our best chance to win games in 2017? Maybe, maybe not, but Canada saw something he could build an offense around.


Brennan looked more ready for the prom than SEC football in 2017 (and 2018, for that matter). I am looking forward to seeing him in 2020, though.
Jump to page
Page First 25 26 27 28 29 ... 80
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 27 of 80Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram