Started By
Message

re: Early line on LSU - UGA: Pick Em per VegasInsider

Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:08 pm to
Posted by cord1321
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2006
2115 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:08 pm to
yea we are 1-3... we covered the Ull game.. i know that for sure cuz i won money on us.. just sayin
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22592 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:09 pm to
Well, vegasinsider had that line at -27. I know for sure because I too won money on it.
Posted by tiger64
Rowlett (Dallas area)
Member since Oct 2004
450 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:13 pm to
hmmmm .. appears the Vegas boys are negatigers -- money talks and bullshite walks !
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134899 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:14 pm to
GA -15
Posted by SoGaFan
Member since Jan 2008
5956 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:42 pm to
I would seriously like to know why LSU has "more potential" that UGA. Not a flame, I just want to know where LSU fans think their players aren't playing up to their max. I will gladly do the same for UGA, although it definitely starts with improving the -9 turnover margin.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:46 pm to
I like my dawgs by a FG only because we have a great FG kicker. Should be an interesting game between two teams who are still looking for a complete game on both sides of the ball.
Posted by tigerblood29
Member since Sep 2009
3062 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:47 pm to
we covered against ULL
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84705 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Right now it's Georgia -2.5

I guess it says something about the polls when the #4 team is the underdog.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77894 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:51 pm to
I
quote:

would seriously like to know why LSU has "more potential" that UGA. Not a flame, I just want to know where LSU fans think their players aren't playing up to their max. I will gladly do the same for UGA, although it definitely starts with improving the -9 turnover margin.


I will step up to the plate.

1) Look at the recruiting classes over the last 4 years.

2) LSU has actually won national championships, with 2 different caoches.

3) Jefferson is farther along than Cox.

4) LSU's secondary is better than any UGA has faced.

5) UGA has given up mega points to lesser offenses in at least 3 games of the 4 played.
This post was edited on 9/27/09 at 7:53 pm
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22592 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

3) Jefferson is farther along than Cox.


That's not what I've seen on the field.

quote:

4) LSU's secondary is better than any UGA has faced.


What does that have to do with LSU or UGA's potential?

quote:

5) UGA has given up mega points to lesser offenses in at least 3 games of the 4 played


That doesn't mean LSU has more potential, that just backs up the sentiment that UGA hasn't performed up to its potential.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84705 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 8:00 pm to
I think its mostly the recruiting classes and, honestly, LSU has been viewed as being more elite than UGA lately b/c of the national titles. I personally doubt theres any talent difference between the two.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77894 posts
Posted on 9/27/09 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

That's not what I've seen on the field.


You obviously haven't watched the games.

quote:

What does that have to do with LSU or UGA's potential?


UGA beat USC and Ark through the air dumbass.


quote:

That doesn't mean LSU has more potential, that just backs up the sentiment that UGA hasn't performed up to its potential.


Good try Socrates. It's no surprise that you failed to reply to 1 and 2.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram