- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Crazy hypothetical
Posted on 8/27/26 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 9:04 pm
What if this somehow manages to drag on longer than anticipated (say week 3 of season) and these kids get granted there fifth year. Would there some how be an argument then, that they technically never played a full year, ran through spring and fall workouts etc?
Could they potentially be granted a 6th year to play a “full” five seasons? I could see some kids who have no options left after college pushing for it and if the league and the ncaa fold to this, would be vulnerable to lawyers.
Could they potentially be granted a 6th year to play a “full” five seasons? I could see some kids who have no options left after college pushing for it and if the league and the ncaa fold to this, would be vulnerable to lawyers.
2
Posted on 8/27/26 at 11:05 pm to SeminoleSniper
they still only get 5 years no matter if its a full season or not
Posted on 8/27/26 at 11:12 pm to SeminoleSniper
My thoughts are why was there not any strong verbiage for a clear effective day in the ruling.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News