Started By
Message
locked post

chris landry just said

Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:33 pm
Posted by rollindaddy
Member since Jun 2010
1725 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:33 pm
if you fail a test like this for tha second time your either
a. stupid
b. have a problem

gotta agree with that
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
15586 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:34 pm to
Derrrrrp
Posted by Patch
Westlake, TX
Member since Jan 2010
2654 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:35 pm to
Duck
Posted by BigShotBobert
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jul 2010
948 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:36 pm to
Truth. Shocked at everyone defending these guys. Once is a mistake. Twice is idiotic
Posted by Paulu
Mandeville
Member since Dec 2006
4440 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:37 pm to
C. You lack respect for your coaches, the rules and your fellow teammates
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Truth. Shocked at everyone defending these guys. Once is a mistake. Twice is idiotic



Way to make a judgement without knowing ALL the facts.

We don't know what they failed or if they failed.

Way to ASSume.
Posted by Champs
Geaux Tigers
Member since Feb 2008
11699 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:38 pm to
quote:


C. You lack respect for your coaches, the rules and your fellow teammates


this
Posted by Soft_Parade
Member since Sep 2005
2502 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:39 pm to
Have to agree. It's C.
Posted by rollindaddy
Member since Jun 2010
1725 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:39 pm to
ya bc everyone getting suspended for 1 game is the norm in college football
Posted by rollindaddy
Member since Jun 2010
1725 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:40 pm to
totally agree with c
Posted by Shreveporter
In the new nap pods
Member since Jan 2011
1337 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:40 pm to
I didn't realize until I read it on here tonight that typically players aren't suspended until they fail a second time (so the first is a freebie or puts them on a sort of probation, I guess?) However, do we know for a fact that it's always the case that suspensions aren't handed down unless it's at least a second offense? The coach's hand would be forced in the case of a second positive test but could he choose to suspend a player for a first offense? Is there a circumstance under which you could see a coach doing this?
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56280 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:40 pm to
D. You just wanted to get a high and relax after giving your all for LSU
Posted by Beaux
Down On The Bayou
Member since Sep 2005
4585 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:41 pm to
How do we know this is a second time, I find it odd that all three are suspeneded for a second time, why not just one of the 3 unless they are more who violated a first offense
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:41 pm to
My point is that EVERYONE is assuming they failed 2 tests.

How do we know that? Perhaps Les is just making a point!
Posted by 1984Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Apr 2006
7272 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

D. You just wanted to get a high and relax after giving your all for LSU

Because obviously there's no other means of relaxing than getting high.

Posted by 1984Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Apr 2006
7272 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

How do we know that? Perhaps Les is just making a point!

Right ... Les is going to suspend 3 key players just to make a point in the middle of a National Championship run. Kind of like the point he made with RP right up until the time he had to kick him off the team.
Posted by King of New Orleans
In front of The Hungry Tiger
Member since Jul 2011
9946 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

chris landry


Posted by MJM
Member since Aug 2007
2485 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:45 pm to
oh noes they are addicted to the weed
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62395 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:46 pm to
I'd imagine its a first offense, from all I've heard. Also, imagine there was a snitch, in just speculating . No one knows the real facts from what I'm picking up, just a lot of speculation. Young guys not ready for the success they are having is my take.
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

I didn't realize until I read it on here tonight that typically players aren't suspended until they fail a second time (so the first is a freebie or puts them on a sort of probation, I guess?) However, do we know for a fact that it's always the case that suspensions aren't handed down unless it's at least a second offense? The coach's hand would be forced in the case of a second positive test but could he choose to suspend a player for a first offense? Is there a circumstance under which you could see a coach doing this?



A coach can do WTF he wants. I think all this guess work is just dumb. LSU rules are different than NCAA rules.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram