- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can someone explain why SOS "Strength of Schedule" is not considered more?
Posted on 11/17/12 at 9:23 am to Tigerik
Posted on 11/17/12 at 9:23 am to Tigerik
socialism. plus the country is tired of the SEC winning all the time and they want non SEC teams to win more no matter how they do it. the future of SEC dominance is in question even if we are the best because of scheduling. just look at our own conference where florida and lsu had tougher schedules than bama and georgia. one game can make a differnce.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 11:04 am to MikeTheTiger58
SOS is perfect right now. The computers calculate it however they do, but it is a major component of all of the rankings. Basically there are three factors in the computer SOS, win loss, and home and away.
Voters figure it into their votes which is why nd is behind the other undefeated teams.
Voters figure it into their votes which is why nd is behind the other undefeated teams.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 11:28 am to nobodytooimportant
To be top ranked :
1. Be undefeated
2. Be Notre Dame or from a 'Big' conference.
3. Have a tough schedule.
In other words , no losses, supersedes anything, unless you are from a 'small'
conference.
It's not about the who is the 'best' team! Never has.
1. Be undefeated
2. Be Notre Dame or from a 'Big' conference.
3. Have a tough schedule.
In other words , no losses, supersedes anything, unless you are from a 'small'
conference.
It's not about the who is the 'best' team! Never has.
This post was edited on 11/17/12 at 11:31 am
Posted on 11/17/12 at 11:55 am to lsuag88
quote:
LSU has lost 2 times. Three other teams have zero losses. 1 team that beat you has only one loss. So what's the question?
And the reason all the pundits and Bama fans give for losing to the Aggies (other than Johnny Football)? They had to play a very tough, physical game against LSU the week prior. IMO strength of schedule makes a HUGE difference. You get beat down physically and emotionally in those games. Bama has to get up for two games this whole year. They lost one of them. Their schedule next year looks about the same. Just ain't right.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:08 pm to bastropbham
all SEC MNC last year definitely put a big anti-SEC bias out there. i'd say one of the biggest problems with the BCS is the coaches poll. it is a joke. those guys only look at the 12 teams on their schedule.
Posted on 11/17/12 at 12:58 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
Is that how Auburn got royally screwed in 2004, because if I recall ... their SOS was brutal.
I could be wrong but I remember their schedule being incredibly soft.
No way they were jumping Texas or USC anyways. There is really zero argument.
Popular
Back to top

0




