- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cam Cameron, How did he grade out last night?
Posted on 10/18/15 at 10:39 am to SabiDojo
Posted on 10/18/15 at 10:39 am to SabiDojo
i like the zone-read triple option out of the 2-back shotgun set. little things like that help your primary back over the long run
you only have to run it a few times to lead to major potential payoff, and it's not going to be a negative play often
you only have to run it a few times to lead to major potential payoff, and it's not going to be a negative play often
1
Posted on 10/18/15 at 10:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
3 is a miles issue more than anything and it is what it is
This isnt an issue this year. Its a big time strength. Every team we play now has its base defense completely thrown out the window to stop our I formation. And it wont matter how good harris gets.......they are still going to load up the box.
Posted on 10/18/15 at 10:41 am to SlowFlowPro
I prefer the shotgun, too, because of Harris's speed and running ability.
Posted on 10/18/15 at 10:46 am to Rex
i don't mind a traditional formation as our base. i just hate the fricking i-formation as our base
but the shotgun is a valid every down formation and i believe in multiple sets with the same personnel
running a personnel package of a single back and 2 TEs means we can run all sorts of formations without issue (esp with smith and jeter at TE)
running a personnel package with a FB tells the D exactly how we're going to line up in the box. i just find it limiting
but the shotgun is a valid every down formation and i believe in multiple sets with the same personnel
running a personnel package of a single back and 2 TEs means we can run all sorts of formations without issue (esp with smith and jeter at TE)
running a personnel package with a FB tells the D exactly how we're going to line up in the box. i just find it limiting
Posted on 10/18/15 at 11:13 am to HurricaneTiger
quote:
it'll be a toss-up for sure
Way to go out on a limb there.
Posted on 10/18/15 at 11:16 am to SlowFlowPro
I've been wondering as I watched Texas A&M, Baylor, TCU, TTech, etc. yesterday...
Does Texas high school football make their defenders SOFT?
We know that the shotgun-read option attack dominates the sport there... is there something about constantly defending it that makes Texans pursuit conscious rather than contact happy?
Why doesn't ANYBODY in Texas have a good defense?
Does Texas high school football make their defenders SOFT?
We know that the shotgun-read option attack dominates the sport there... is there something about constantly defending it that makes Texans pursuit conscious rather than contact happy?
Why doesn't ANYBODY in Texas have a good defense?
Posted on 10/18/15 at 11:21 am to Rex
strong is trying to build one
you cannot consistently stop a top-flight offense (and they face them almost every week in the big12), so adjustments are made defensively to try to concentrate on big plays (turnovers/sacks) and limiting red zone scoring. that also requires quick/fast defenders, which gives up physicality
i mean that conference has a lot of coaches who would love to play ball control/defense (stoops, snyder, patterson, strong, etc) but it's just not an option over a 12-game season in the big12
you cannot consistently stop a top-flight offense (and they face them almost every week in the big12), so adjustments are made defensively to try to concentrate on big plays (turnovers/sacks) and limiting red zone scoring. that also requires quick/fast defenders, which gives up physicality
i mean that conference has a lot of coaches who would love to play ball control/defense (stoops, snyder, patterson, strong, etc) but it's just not an option over a 12-game season in the big12
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News