- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Burrow is the best complete QB in the SEC. True or False?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:28 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:28 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
miles didnt have a good scheme. see how normal people can admit things?
Hmmmm, so when does scheme not matter?
1
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:29 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Who did Miles outscheme?
who has Ensminger?
its amazing that you think anyone was actually touting Miles' offenses aside from a few of them.
neither offense was outscheming teams.
see how i admit that?
now you try...
admit that inexperience IS NOT a valid excuse against mid majors and shite defenses.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:30 pm to Rickdaddy4188
When does scheme not matter, Ricky?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:31 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Another lie you cannot link.
thats what you're implying when you say Ensminger didnt have the personnel to run the offense he wanted from the beginning. we have the same personnel as last year's offense except they are upperclassmen.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:32 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
admit that inexperience IS NOT a valid excuse against mid majors and shite defenses.
Scheme absolutely matters, the talented and experienced 2017 is the only LSU team in well over a dacade that lost to a non-P5. 2017’s team had a shite show scheme.Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:33 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Hmmmm, so when does scheme not matter?
all the time.
especially when shite defenses with vastly inferior talent is shutting down your offense for an entire half.
its amazing how youve turned my stance that scheme was the biggest issue into scheme was the only issue and better talent wouldnt produce more.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:33 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
especially when shite defenses with vastly inferior talent is shutting down your offense for an entire half.
I totally agree, Troy did do that.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:34 pm to The First Cut
quote:
Scheme absolutely matters, the talented and experienced 2017 is the only LSU team in well over a dacade that lost to a non-P5. 2017’s team had a shite show scheme.
so did 2018.
thats why shite defenses and vastly inferior teams shut us down for vast lengths of time.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:35 pm to Rickdaddy4188
LSU built a commanding lead and then sat on the ball. That sitting on the ball wasn’t the regular “scheme”. Grow up, Ricky.Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:36 pm to The First Cut
quote:
totally agree, Troy did do that
so what was the point of us going back and forth and you taking umbrage my stance that scheme was the biggest issue?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:38 pm to Rickdaddy4188
It’s not the biggest issue when you have 4 new OL (1 returning starter has only 7 starts), new QB that arrived in June, new RB with 300 career yards, and new WRs.
In this scenario, experience is far and away the bigger issue.
In this scenario, experience is far and away the bigger issue.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:45 pm to The First Cut
quote:
LSU built a commanding lead and then sat on the ball. That sitting on the ball wasn’t the regular “scheme”. Grow up, Ricky.
we had 126 yards until 50 seconds left in the 1st half.
we had a hail mary type throw into the endzone as the 1st half came to a close
63 yards and 3 1st downs against Southeastern
barely getting 400 yards against la tech
having a shite arky defense hold us to 359 yards.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:48 pm to The First Cut
quote:
It’s not the biggest issue when you have 4 new OL (1 returning starter has only 7 starts), new QB that arrived in June, new RB with 300 career yards, and new WR
this is a valid excuse against good teams.
quote:
this scenario, experience is far and away the bigger issue.
thats your opinion.
if we need juniors and seniors for the scheme to be competent its a shite scheme.
just like when Miles needed vastly more talent for his scheme to be productive.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:52 pm to Rickdaddy4188
I wonder why Canada didn’t get this same excuse from the Cheerios? He basically had the same Oline just younger and he didn’t nearly have the WRs that we had last season but you never hear them making these excuses for him even though his offense was better in every way. In fact they blast Canada, I wonder why that is? The Cheerios would never use double standards would they?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:54 pm to Madking
quote:
wonder why Canada didn’t get this same excuse from the Cheerios?
i noticed that too.
when did anyone mention that Canada didnt have the personnel to run his offense in 2017?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:59 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Yes indeed he was. But he was stuck in a second-rate scheme, and with inexperienced players all around him. AND, with next to no time to prepare for the season.
This here's Crawfish Jeaux.
quote:
You are confusing stats with raw talent.
I very well could be. But I'll tell ya one thing that I'm not confused about. And that's the fact that as long as you've been posting on the rant, you've been burping Joe Burrow cum bubbles every time you submit a post about the young man.
He's no where near as gifted as you claim he his. At least he hasn't shown it to be true yet.
In my opinion.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 12:00 am to Rickdaddy4188
He had 1 viable WR on that squad while last seasons roster had 7 lol. He had effectively the same Oline only they were freshman and he had them performing at a much higher level but you don’t see the pink ladies mention that either. They constantly trash him even though his offense was far superior even with 0 ruining it as much as humanly possible. These people are so myopic in thought they don’t notice that all their narratives conflict with each other. In one breathe they’ll say Miles left him with nothing then the very next sentence they’re excited because the juniors are staying for 0 lol. Well if they can’t play why do you want them back?
This post was edited on 5/22/19 at 12:04 am
Posted on 5/22/19 at 12:10 am to Madking
quote:
I wonder why Canada didn’t get this same excuse from the Cheerios?
Some of them think that Canada is the antichrist. He was only here to take down poor ole Ed.
quote:
The Cheerios would never use double standards would they?
Of course not. that's crazy talk. Hahahahaha.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 12:10 am to Rickdaddy4188
And there’s a reason they’re so in love with Brady. Brady is the ultimate excuse and stall pawn for them. If the offense improves it’s because he and Burrow were great pickups by 0, even though 0 didn’t really go after Brady. If the offense bombs again it’s because Brady wasn’t the real OC so we have to give 0 another year before we judge him and it also makes him look loyal to Ensminger which is another excuse they’ll use to make 0 look like a good guy. They know Brady isn’t the OC and won’t be calling plays but they’re pretending he is to power the summer hype machine. These people couldn’t care less about LSU, some of them have openly said or indirectly proven they’re strictly 0 fans.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 12:13 am to earl keese
What 0 did to Canada is a fricking disgrace but these people are trash and didn’t hesitate to parrot the lies 0s minions flooded the press with in the most cowardly and low fashion I’ve ever seen in my life. The coaching fraternity is a tight nit group so you know 0 pulled a classless stunt when other coaches around the country came out and said shame on Orgeron for what he did to Canada. It takes a blatant act for that to happen.
This post was edited on 5/22/19 at 12:14 am
Page 36 of 37
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News