- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Athlete compensation-Supreme Court Decision- Unanimous:sides with student athletes
Posted on 6/21/21 at 2:22 pm to BruceUnhinged
Posted on 6/21/21 at 2:22 pm to BruceUnhinged
I posted this in the MSB but find it relevant here because it’s same topic and issue
I always considered undergraduate sports a sui generis entity and should be treated as such when it comes to the law, nothing like it in the world and nothing like it outside of schools, a uniquely American entity. Once tv and that NCAA v. University of Oklahoma SCOTUS case came into the picture the waters definitely got muddied and now college coaches are worth millions which would’ve been unthinkable back in the 50s/60s, it’s a big business unlike anything the NCAA creators during Teddy Roosevelt’s time could’ve ever foreseen. Luckily, the money from tv and exposure go to all the non-tv sports and education relative to the participating schools so it’s not implicating the Department of Education or RICO statute directly. The athletes are there to be students and they receive the benefits of being students and big-time athletes without having to pay or be taxed on what they receive, that’s why they receive full scholarships and attend an actual school, not a profession.
I always considered undergraduate sports a sui generis entity and should be treated as such when it comes to the law, nothing like it in the world and nothing like it outside of schools, a uniquely American entity. Once tv and that NCAA v. University of Oklahoma SCOTUS case came into the picture the waters definitely got muddied and now college coaches are worth millions which would’ve been unthinkable back in the 50s/60s, it’s a big business unlike anything the NCAA creators during Teddy Roosevelt’s time could’ve ever foreseen. Luckily, the money from tv and exposure go to all the non-tv sports and education relative to the participating schools so it’s not implicating the Department of Education or RICO statute directly. The athletes are there to be students and they receive the benefits of being students and big-time athletes without having to pay or be taxed on what they receive, that’s why they receive full scholarships and attend an actual school, not a profession.
Posted on 6/21/21 at 2:45 pm to DmitriKaramazov
quote:
Sigh. The ignorance of certain posters is occasionally staggering.
Sigh, the ability of certain posters to be a pompous arse is staggering, though not unexpected.
Posted on 6/21/21 at 2:49 pm to Blutarsky
quote:
Get ready for tuition to increase for non-athletes to pay for their salary.

Posted on 6/21/21 at 2:51 pm to BruceUnhinged
Is membership in the NCAA voluntary for colleges and universities?
If so, why can't the NCAA have rules that govern who is eligible and who isn't?
BTW, I am not against athletes getting paid. Just curious the actual legal standing the athletes have.
If so, why can't the NCAA have rules that govern who is eligible and who isn't?
BTW, I am not against athletes getting paid. Just curious the actual legal standing the athletes have.
Posted on 6/21/21 at 6:07 pm to DmitriKaramazov
quote:your arrogance and lack of self awareness are staggering. when you have to articulate your point with the following wording, the other person's ignorance isn't staggering, just not a pompous knowitall
The ignorance of certain posters is occasionally staggering
quote:
premised on the deleterious impact unfettered
This post was edited on 6/21/21 at 6:09 pm
Popular
Back to top

0





