Started By
Message

Are BIG and PAC12 schools allowing students on campus?

Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:07 pm
Posted by BillF
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2006
5016 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:07 pm
If so, this whole thing about cancelling the football season because of health concerns is pure bull. Do they not care about the thousands of students who are much more vulnerable than 100 football players who are in a controlled environment? If I were the parent of a student on campus, I would question the university's decision to shut down the football program because they think it's too dangerous while opening dorms and dining halls for other students.
Posted by titmouse
a tree branch above your car
Member since May 2006
6358 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:10 pm to
All are to varying extents.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10421 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:19 pm to
TR a month ago: "If they can play football, they can have students on campus. All about money."

TR today: "If they can have students on campus, they can play football. All about money."
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10421 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Do they not care about the thousands of students who are much more vulnerable than 100 football players who are in a controlled environment?
The idea that, outside the ops building, the football players are in any kind of controlled environment is laughable.
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 5:24 pm
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
17449 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

TR a month ago: "If they can play football, they can have students on campus. All about money."

TR today: "If they can have students on campus, they can play football. All about money."

Both are true bruh
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10421 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:26 pm to
How so? The first makes sense. The second is just circular logic.

"If we can set up classrooms to keep people 6 feet apart while wearing masks, we can have a bunch of morbidly obese people rub up on each other for several hours a day."

Basically letting the perfect (protecting everyone at all costs) be the enemy of the good (protecting many people to the extent we can).
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 6:15 pm
Posted by BillF
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2006
5016 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:28 pm to
You obviously never played college football. Other than attending class, we didn't have much free time before curfew Sunday through Friday. If they want to sacrifice a little bit more than we did, they're much safer than the general population.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:28 pm to
Wut
Posted by Woodman
Seattle WA
Member since Aug 2009
1932 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:32 pm to
I know the entire Cal State system is virtual for the fall semester. Only Mountain West Schools there [Fresno State and San Diego State] and that conference already threw in the towel.

As for the UC System [UCLA and UC Berkeley - CAL], CAL has opted to go entirely virtual. LINK /

UCLA is offering 8% of its classes in person. LINK

University of Washington is doing 80% of its classes virtually. LINK /

WSU is doing a "hyflex" approach
LINK /

Oregon State is having no in-person meetings amongst students and staff
LINK

University of Oregon is planning for a responsible and safe return to in-person instruction
LINK /

USC seems to be all online
LINK

Stanford is doing a hybrid
LINK

Arizona State appears to be opening
LINK

Sounds the same for University of Arizona
LINK /

Utah has a hybrid
LINK /

Colorado seems mostly open
LINK






Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10421 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

You obviously never played college football. Other than attending class, we didn't have much free time before curfew Sunday through Friday. If they want to sacrifice a little bit more than we did, they're much safer than the general population.
No, I didn't. You obviously haven't played recently if you think curfew is still an enforceable thing with college football players, except Friday nights in their hotel rooms.

Also the whole "attending class" thing means they aren't in "controlled environments." Having "free time" is very different from being in a "controlled environment" when it comes to respiratory viruses.

The only way CFB works this year is to keep them in an NBA-like bubble. Nothing like your experience where you "didn't have much free time before curfew."
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 6:19 pm
Posted by BillF
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2006
5016 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:23 pm to
I never said the players were in a controlled environment when they were away from the football facilities. Maybe that's why you went back and edited your original post when the down votes started to hit you.

I also never said that football players are subject to curfews today like we were in the old athletic dorm. I merely used it as an example that athletes don't have the same amount of free time as other students, and they're much safer than other students if they're willing to make wise choices with that free time.

Apparently a majority of their classes can be taken online, and they're subject to virus testing and protocols that other students are not. Never said they were in a controlled environment away from the football facilities. Maybe you misunderstood.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10421 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Never said they were in a controlled environment away from the football facilities. Maybe you misunderstood.

I did say they weren't in a controlled environment away from the football facilities. You responded with some type of disagreement. Maybe you misunderstood.

My OP was edited at 5:24. Your first response was 5:26.
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 6:29 pm
Posted by BillF
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2006
5016 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:26 pm to
Gotta admit, you're one editing little fella when it comes to posting
Posted by Woodman
Seattle WA
Member since Aug 2009
1932 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:29 pm to
Having "free time" is very different from being in a "controlled environment" when it comes to respiratory viruses.

Except this is a vascular virus. That is what's freaking out the decision-makers. They don't know the full scope of what COVID-19 is even eight months after it hit the US.

A 27 year old basketball player "recovers" from the virus only to have [as a side effect] an enlarged heart. He subsequently dies from a heart attack playing basketball after recovery. Five other Big 10 Football players who've recovered have the same diagnosis with their hearts. This is NOT the sniffles.

LINK
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 6:34 pm
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10421 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Gotta admit, you're one editing little fella when it comes to posting
My first response was last edited at 5:24. Your first response to it was posted at 5:26.

My bad: You responded at 5:28. Just wanted to acknowledge.
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 6:31 pm
Posted by BillF
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2006
5016 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:32 pm to
Sorry I'm a slow typist. I'll try to do better.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10421 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:35 pm to
Or you could just acknowledge that your first post about "free time" and "curfew" was not a legitimate response to my point.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10421 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

Except this is a vascular virus. That is what's freaking out the decision-makers. They don't know the full scope of what COVID-19 is even eight months after it hit the US.

A 27 year old basketball player "recovers" from the virus only to have [as a side effect] an enlarged heart. He subsequently dies from a heart attack playing basketball after recovery. Five other Big 10 Football players who've recovered have the same diagnosis with their hearts. This is NOT the sniffles.
Just so we're clear, are you saying colleges should or shouldn't let students on campus? Should or shouldn't play football? Is either one logically dependent on the other, health wise?
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117711 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:42 pm to
Or y’all could just kiss.
Posted by BillF
Monroe, LA
Member since Jan 2006
5016 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 6:47 pm to
At this point, I'm not even sure what your point was or if I directly addressed it accordingly. And I'm not too concerned either way. You really need to keep minor things from getting under your skin so easily. It's a sports message board. That's all.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram