- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anonymous opposing coaches talk LSU
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:48 am to Rickdaddy4188
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:48 am to Rickdaddy4188
At an absolute minimum, the standard should at least be better than what got the old coach fired
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:50 am to bencoleman
quote:
doesn't surprise me that you're here tonight trying again to misrepresent and tell baldfaced lies.
cause you never do this.....
quote:
You believe that college football teams don't need upperclassmen
oops
if only there wasnt post history.
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 2:52 am
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:50 am to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
You're not wrong in expecting that LSU should be able to develop a plug and play type of offense so to speak, year in and year out
WTF? You should call the coaching staff and offer to help them install your plug and play offense I'm sure that they'll jump right on that.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:51 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
oops
Oops what? I have your post bookmarked.
Here is your post.
youre straight up saying you think the scheme needs juniors and seniors to be able to consistently move the ball
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 2:54 am
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:53 am to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
At an absolute minimum, the standard should at least be better than what got the old coach fired
Exactly. Why fire the previous coach if "we're going to settle for this?"
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:54 am to bencoleman
Truth hurt?
You have the audacity to get on here and flip out while having profane laden tantrums and you expect people to take you seriously?
You twist things around to suit your narrative and if the foundation to your garbage point is pointed out to be wrong with proof, you go right into tantrum mode.
O could key your car and you'd be like, "thanks for the autograph! OMG!"
You have the audacity to get on here and flip out while having profane laden tantrums and you expect people to take you seriously?
You twist things around to suit your narrative and if the foundation to your garbage point is pointed out to be wrong with proof, you go right into tantrum mode.
O could key your car and you'd be like, "thanks for the autograph! OMG!"
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 2:57 am
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:54 am to la_birdman
quote:
"we're going to settle for this?
Shitty troll is shitty.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:55 am to la_birdman
quote:At least 3. It's a war in there. Not many 18 & 19 year olds can bang heads with 20 to 22 year olds who have been in the weight room for 4 or 5 years.
How many years do they need? We're going on year 3. (4 if you want to count O's interim time)
Technique too, but mostly strength and aggression.
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 2:56 am
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:55 am to bencoleman
quote:
Oops what? I have your post bookmarked.
then qoute it.
at no point did i say anything about,"You believe that college football teams don't need upperclassmen."
thats something you made up.
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 2:56 am
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:56 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
no point did i say anything about You believe that college football teams don't need upperclassmen.
thats something you made up
I just posted your words.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:56 am to bencoleman
I would, but Orgeron would just run me off when I dont bend the knee.
Take a look at the most successful teams over the last five years. Specifically the offense of said teams. They each plug in new ghus year after year with little to no drop in production. You're dumb if you think it isn't possible.
Take a look at the most successful teams over the last five years. Specifically the offense of said teams. They each plug in new ghus year after year with little to no drop in production. You're dumb if you think it isn't possible.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:57 am to bencoleman
quote:
I just posted your words
link me to the post.
at no time did i say cfb teams dont need upperclassmen.
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 2:58 am
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:58 am to bencoleman
quote:
Shitty troll is shitty.
Such a valuable and reasonable retort. Nothing to refute it, you'll just use that 15 year old mentality like always.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:58 am to la_birdman
He is 15 and his mother would be very upset to know what he is doing at 0300!
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:00 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
At least 3.
So if he doesn't produce this year, then you'll agree he didn't live up to expectations? Even though he said yada yada
Not saying I want that to happen, but let's just say for argument's sake.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:01 am to bencoleman
quote:
I just posted your words.
Show the link where he said LSU needs no upperclassmen.
Or would that blow holes in your little argument like always?
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:02 am to la_birdman
Could take up to 10 years to develop an interior offensive lineman. I mean have you ever in your life seen an underclassman make an all conf or All-American team? I do t think so. Lol have you ever seen someone come up with so many stupid and completely false takes in your life? Literally every statement isn’t just wrong it’s the antithesis of correct. Take this last one for example, offensive tackles are far more rare and harder to develop than interior lineman but this dingbat says the exact opposite lmfao.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:04 am to bencoleman
here is what i said.....
this is just another example of me having photographical evidence of you lying.
this is just another example of me having photographical evidence of you lying.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:05 am to la_birdman
I remember the conversation, Rick was mocking someone, I think it was Buckeye for saying this. It wasn’t Rick who made the statement he was being sarcastic because it was a stupid statement. But once again Bengay is using a pink lady staple, misquoting and misrepresenting what someone said.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:05 am to la_birdman
quote:
Show the link where he said LSU needs no upperclassmen.
he cant because it didnt happen.
i said we have a shite scheme if we need juniors and seniors to consistently move the ball against shite defenses.
at no point did i say cfb teams dont need upperclassmen.
but hey you can't expect Ben to be truthful.
Popular
Back to top


1



