- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 99 wins in the 2000's
Posted on 11/30/09 at 1:51 am to BayouBengals03
Posted on 11/30/09 at 1:51 am to BayouBengals03
quote:
It might be stupid, but that's how it is.
Hey, I'm "with it" - I'm "hip" - if the kids, out of convenience, laziness, whatever, want to refer to decades by "50s", "60s", whatever (for the record, my post about the various "decades" did follow the popular consensus, though it is by no means universally accepted or conceded), and they neither know or care that there is a "decade" with only 9 years at the beginning of the system, that's fine - I know and care.
This post was edited on 11/30/09 at 1:52 am
Posted on 11/30/09 at 2:30 am to BayouBengals03
Let's just call it 2000-2010. A little bit of compromise for people to stop b!tching at each other...
It is 2000-2009
It is 2000-2009
Posted on 11/30/09 at 2:57 am to bbolti1
The number, zero, was brought to Europe from India by 800 CE. Time to get used to it. It may be true that the year 2000 is only 1999 years from 1 CE, but our calendar routinely varies the number of days in a year, and on at least one occasion, "jumped" two weeks to correct rounding errors. We can deal with a 9 year decade (1-9) if it makes our system make more sense (and it does). Decades start with the zeros. 2000-2009.
(What a sad first post.)
(What a sad first post.)
Posted on 11/30/09 at 7:45 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
they neither know or care that there is a "decade" with only 9 years at the beginning of the system, that's fine - I know and care.
Ace, this level of detail separates those who think critically from those who do not. It demonstrates why some people will still defend a coach who can't manage the clock or doesn't know when to attempt a 2 pt. conversion versus when not to attempt. BTW, on another thread some guy with the LNCHBOX handle actually said from 1/01/1 to 1/01/10 is ten years. For all I know, the guy could be an insurance actuary.

ETA: LSUMafia did clarify the whole debate by showing the date range from 2000-2009. Probably the smartest thing anyone's done in this whole debate.

This post was edited on 11/30/09 at 7:51 am
Back to top
