Started By
Message

re: #2 LSU at #1 OU Gym Thread/LSU Falls to OU- 198.125 to 197.925

Posted on 2/21/26 at 7:46 am to
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
47864 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 7:46 am to
OU wins on reputation more than anything else

They’re fundamentally sound but boring routines and questionable judging many times
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77935 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 8:02 am to
Pretty much what I expected. You could tell that Jay and the team knew what they were up against too and were just trying to perform well. Maybe we will get better judging in the postseason. It wasn’t going to happen at OU. Congrats to Chio on a great night, regardless!
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
70014 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 8:41 am to
They did great!

Great score. They’ll improve and get a better score on a more neutral territory
Posted by Bedtiger
Thibodaux
Member since Dec 2018
793 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:01 am to
That was 2 evenly matched teams. I had LSU slightly ahead but didn’t expect LSU to beat OU in their home gym. Even the head coach was telling the team to compete and not look at the scores, he knew that we would come up a little short due to the bias of the OU judges. The score should have been much closer. LSU outperformed OU in 2 of the events yet the judges had them behind in all 4 events.
Posted by LSU90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
701 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:47 pm to
Maybe you can explain, how did Oklahoma get two 9.90, one 9.925 and a 89.875 when they took steps on five of the six vaults. From what I've read, there is a .1 reduction for minor steps an a .15 reduction for medium steps, which means that the raw score was 10.0 for two vaults and greater that 10.0 for two more of the vaults. That seems unreasonable since they were not given any pure 10.0 in the entire meet.

That being said, their score was 49.525 for the event, which seems to be at least a full .1 higher than feasible. If that translates the entire meet, then they were likely scored .4 too high.
It really doesn't matter as I understand it who won this particular meet, but it surely must matter if scores are that subjective. It kind of puts a huge question mark on the entire sport.
Posted by lsugymfann
Seattle
Member since Apr 2020
966 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

That was 2 evenly matched teams. I had LSU slightly ahead but didn’t expect LSU to beat OU in their home gym. Even the head coach was telling the team to compete and not look at the scores, he knew that we would come up a little short due to the bias of the OU judges. The score should have been much closer. LSU outperformed OU in 2 of the events yet the judges had them behind in all 4 events.


Jay has always said that if you don’t win by more than .3 as the home team, you really haven’t won the meet at all because neutral site judges neutralize that gap with scoring. We were within .2 of them, WITHOUT our typical bar and floor anchors that typically score 9.925+ and without Konnor in the 5 spot on beam. Yes she has had some struggles so far this season but we know what she’s capable of when she’s ON. Not to mention, regardless of our ranking going into post season (which should have us as a number one seed for regionals regardless), we don’t have to travel for regionals so that puts us at a significant advantage over oklahoma before nationals in terms of training, rest and scoring
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115485 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:25 pm to
It was at OU. That's all you need to know.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram