Started By
Message

re: Wish list

Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:35 am to
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18293 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:35 am to
quote:

"BillyBob" = another trash pale that thinks he knows more than our head coach.

You're a dime-a-dozen, and you know, Billy.

A trash pale? For telling the truth?

By the way Dumbass, are you the same Dave that lied about being a Navy Seal to get girls to email you pics? I bet this is your new SN. Now that guy was a trash pale. We should get a mod to check it out.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18293 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I'm going to lunch...I'll be back to make fun of you weak little nerds later.

////// Damn just scared the shite out of me. This guy sounds tough. He probably weighs 350lbs.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18293 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:40 am to
quote:

I dont know what Molton was thinking. Did we ever get a reason he left?

Seems like I remember him being frustrated because he felt like his injury was setting him back in the WR ranks. But what he failed to realize was most of those guys would be gone.
Posted by tiggah1981
Winterfell
Member since Aug 2007
18043 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Wish list


My wish would be Fobbs, Parker, Copeland, and Boone. My guess would be Thomas and Jackson. Pretty disappointing end to this recruiting season if this were to happen.
Posted by lsumma09
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2008
1092 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:46 am to
He definitely needed somebody to talk him down. Seemed like a knee jerk reaction from a guy that had worked his way into the mix
Posted by LSUisOVER9000
Member since Nov 2009
2751 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:46 am to
quote:

My wish would be Fobbs, Parker, Copeland, and Boone. My guess would be Thomas and Jackson. Pretty disappointing end to this recruiting season if this were to happen.

I dont know where Thomas is coming from..we have a good shot with Boone and Fobbs
Posted by tygerfan11
Member since Jun 2008
804 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:47 am to
quote:

DaveDog


Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85557 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 11:51 am to
quote:

and Boone is at #5? we really need WRs right now.


I do not agree with this statement, but i do with the op. None of the wr we take will see any pt this year.
Posted by ShadyTiger182
Knoxville, Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
779 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 12:08 pm to
If LSU can get back to having a dominant line/running game. Ill be more content with Toliver,RR, with Russell mixed in and the recruits from this class. That could hold LSU over until the highly praised 2011 comes around.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13317 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 12:13 pm to
Would any of you guys saying wr is a huge need rather take all 3 recievers and chance missing on one or two of next year's in state guys.Even though all seem to be heavy LSU leans they will look at the depth chart and how many recievers are on the roster in the same 1-2 year gap.I don't mind taking Fobbs and Boone andthink we should but Thomas is only a take if we miss on both of them imo.I don't have any issue with taking Thomas if necessary.i think most of the reason he has no offers has to with the grade issues.Recievers are very easy to find with any rating.There are a lot of sleeper,underrecruited recievers in college and the NFL right now.If a guy can run good routes,catch the ball and set up his defender to create space then they can be successful.Also Thomas must have a good test score or he wouldn't be visiting.Leads me to believe that he's closer to qualifying than some think.
Posted by TigerInAtx
Austin,TX
Member since Aug 2007
449 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 12:23 pm to
I have a feeling we end up with

Jackson
Thomas
Boone
Fobbs

Parker - Clemson
Ego - Miami
Copeland - Tenn
Riley - UCLA

This post was edited on 1/29/10 at 12:25 pm
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38920 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Would any of you guys saying wr is a huge need rather take all 3 recievers and chance missing on one or two of next year's in state guys.


You can't always depend on "next year." Besides the 2011 class of WRs is better than these WRs and I would hope they could see that.
Posted by LSUisOVER9000
Member since Nov 2009
2751 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

You can't always depend on "next year." Besides the 2011 class of WRs is better than these WRs and I would hope they could see that.


I hope we can atleast get two more WRs from this class and let 2011 WRs developed
Posted by whodatnation
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2009
18 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 12:48 pm to
First let me say, I'm not really up to date with which OLinemen we have a legit chance at, however, I think judging by last year that is our most concerning need at this point. If you have no protection, you can't get the ball to these WRs whom you want to sign...
Posted by LSUisOVER9000
Member since Nov 2009
2751 posts
Posted on 1/29/10 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

First let me say, I'm not really up to date with which OLinemen we have a legit chance at, however, I think judging by last year that is our most concerning need at this point. If you have no protection, you can't get the ball to these WRs whom you want to sign...

IMO...I think we had a young OL and they'll improved, but OL is needed if we can get better players
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram