- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Top analysts now predicting Malik Newman to LSU ... UPDATE: Last 6 CBs for LSU
Posted on 3/11/15 at 9:32 am to thunderbird1100
Posted on 3/11/15 at 9:32 am to thunderbird1100
GP MINS PPG RPG APG SPG BPG
Andrew Harrison 31 25.4 8.8 2.2 3.8 1.0 0.2
TPG FG% FT% 3P%
1.8 .366 .787 .365
Tyler Ulis 29 22.9 5.4 1.7 3.6 0.8 0.1 1.0 .414 .781 .419
So just because Ulis FG% and 3point% is better than Andrew you mean to tell m e he is better? Are you serious Sir? Look at the stats, Andrew is better clearly.
Andrew Harrison 31 25.4 8.8 2.2 3.8 1.0 0.2
TPG FG% FT% 3P%
1.8 .366 .787 .365
Tyler Ulis 29 22.9 5.4 1.7 3.6 0.8 0.1 1.0 .414 .781 .419
So just because Ulis FG% and 3point% is better than Andrew you mean to tell m e he is better? Are you serious Sir? Look at the stats, Andrew is better clearly.
quote:Lol I guess the numbers show Ulis is clearly better and its not even close in your words. I guess the numbers are lying, the same way he scored 2 points 3 assists and 1 rebound, as for Andrew vs us he had 13pts 4ast 3 rbds.
You'd rather the better player play because he's shorter? Fact is Ulis is better than Andrew, it isn't close. I don't care if Andrew was a 6'9 PG, he's not very good at all. Ulis does EVERYTHING better offensively than Andrew.
1
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:05 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Ulis not only has a better Ast:TO ratio, he shoots astronomically better than Andrew does...once again, it's not close.
Ulis - 41.4% FG/41.9% 3 pt
Andrew - 36.6% FG/36.5% 3 pt
First of all, Andrew has taken about 75 more shots than Ulis, so there's a much smaller sample size for Ulis.
Secondly, I said (and I'm fairly certain repeated) that they've been about equal in the last couple months, not all season. Ulis was better early, but Andrew has come on strong of late. Again, you clearly haven't been paying attention.
This post was edited on 3/11/15 at 10:06 am
Posted on 3/11/15 at 10:32 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
he shoots astronomically better than Andrew does...once again, it's not close.
Ulis - 41.4% FG/41.9% 3 pt
Andrew - 36.6% FG/36.5% 3 pt
I normally like and agree with your posts, but these are not astronomically different and are in fact relatively close especially considering the different sample sizes.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 7:16 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
I normally like and agree with your posts, but these are not astronomically different and are in fact relatively close especially considering the different sample sizes.
5% difference is very big
Go from 36/36 down to 31/31 and those are awful numbers
36% FG is very mediocre, 36% 3 pt is decent
41% FG is good, 41% 3 pt is very very good...especially when you're talking about a smaller PG
Not only this, but Ulis has a better assist turnover ratio than Andrew. Ulis is simply better, proof is in the numbers. He shoots way better, makes better decisions and handles the ball with more care.
This post was edited on 3/11/15 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 3/11/15 at 7:19 pm to LSU-DUDE
quote:
So just because Ulis FG% and 3point% is better than Andrew you mean to tell m e he is better?
No, MUCH better FG% and 3 pt %...ON TOP of being a better PG in itself with assist:to ratio. He is better across the board with the ball no matter how you want to slice it.
Andrew and Aaron Harrison arent smart bball players. Aaron has shot by far the most 3's on the team but shoots an abysmal 29% from 3. Andrew has taken the 3rd most overall shots on the team as a PG yet has by far the worst shooting percentage on the team outside of his own brother (of folks who actually play).
This post was edited on 3/11/15 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 7:12 am to Minnesota Tigah
2 more CBs for LSU since OP, LSU now ahead of MSU 
LINK
LINKPosted on 3/16/15 at 7:29 am to Minnesota Tigah
I would be curious to see if the Zags Blog writer has anything new. I think all the others are just piggybacking off of Meyer's swap but I know Zags Blog (No, it's not a Gonzaga website) sometimes gets some inside info
Posted on 3/16/15 at 12:56 pm to GeauxAggie972
We are the team to beat right now.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 1:22 pm to SNAPPERHEAD
Posted on 3/16/15 at 1:23 pm to SNAPPERHEAD
quote:
We are the team to beat right now.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 2:05 pm to Manswers
PG Newman
G Hornsby
G Blakeney
F Simmons
F Mickey/Martin (I doubt both stay if they do both will start)
If they don't stay I think You see Malone, Elbert, or Victor another big will have to step up. Probably see Patterson grey and quarterman all rotate throughout the guard position they can all play multiple positions but I could see this being the most talented lineup
also Think bridgewater can bring something to the table he looks like hes holding back some but when he attacks he showed can make some plays
G Hornsby
G Blakeney
F Simmons
F Mickey/Martin (I doubt both stay if they do both will start)
If they don't stay I think You see Malone, Elbert, or Victor another big will have to step up. Probably see Patterson grey and quarterman all rotate throughout the guard position they can all play multiple positions but I could see this being the most talented lineup
also Think bridgewater can bring something to the table he looks like hes holding back some but when he attacks he showed can make some plays
This post was edited on 3/16/15 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 2:56 pm to geauxfred3
Martin isn't playing the 5 and hopefully Mickey doesn't either. Would like to see Victor or Robertson there.
Newman
Hornsby
Simmons
Mickey
Victor
Patterson
Blakeney
Quarterman
Epps
Robertson
That's nasty
Btw I don't see Blakeney starting from the jump over Hornsby. Not to say he won't play just as much if not more, but Keith starts as of now in my eyes.
Newman
Hornsby
Simmons
Mickey
Victor
Patterson
Blakeney
Quarterman
Epps
Robertson
That's nasty
Btw I don't see Blakeney starting from the jump over Hornsby. Not to say he won't play just as much if not more, but Keith starts as of now in my eyes.
This post was edited on 3/16/15 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 3/16/15 at 3:00 pm to BASED
I feel like the only way Jones gets Mickey back is if he sells Mickey on experience at the 3. He and Simmons could switch out, so scouts can get a look at Micket at SF. Otherwise, I'm not sure what Mickey has to gain coming back as a 4 full-time.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 3:15 pm to BASED
quote:
Newman
Hornsby
Simmons
Mickey
Victor
Patterson
Blakeney
Quarterman
Epps
Robertson
I love Hornsby, but he isn't as good as Blakeney. Blakeney is a lottery pick that could take over a game with 30+ points.
Might get the "senior start" but he will either play alongside him or behind him most of the time IMO.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 3:19 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
Otherwise, I'm not sure what Mickey has to gain coming back as a 4 full-time.
Ummmm
He's injured, a tweener, played his worst basketball at the end of the year, and is not projected to be drafted at all.
Next year we will be all over TV, he will have a stronger supporting cast, and he can work on his offensive game facing the basket (and defense on ball).
He won't be drafted at this point. He shouldn't go pro.
Martin is the opposite situation. He's 6'10" so he's got the height for a 4 in the NBA and he's peaking at the end of the year and is fully healthy. He should probably go pro, even though he could REALLY dominate next year as our 5 next to that ridiculous lineup. He wouldn't face the opponent #1 or double teams very often with Ben Simmons on the court.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 3:24 pm to TheCaterpillar
I agree. Love Hornsby's blue collar work ethic but Blakeney is way better. We may have to resurrect the old 1980s Tulane Posse style with 2 five man line-ups.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 3:26 pm to TheCaterpillar
I have the same stance you do in regards to Mickey coming back. I just think he's a NBA three that's having to play the 4 right now. If he wants to be a first round pick, he needs exposure at the 3. We can give him that opportunity of Epps and Robinson develop, and Simmons plays at the 4 against undersized teams
Posted on 3/16/15 at 3:30 pm to tigerbait2010
Mickey can barely dribble how's he gonna play the 3? He's an undersized 4 it's that simple. Mickey doesn't have the lateral quicks to guard a 3 and ha nowhere near the offensive game to be a 3.
Posted on 3/16/15 at 3:39 pm to lil tiger22
True. there are a lot more undersized power forwards now than ever in the NBA, so he could probably stay at the 4
Posted on 3/16/15 at 3:53 pm to TheCaterpillar
Martin is as much of a 5 as Mickey is a 3, which is NOT AT ALL. Martin is a slow 3 or a stretch 4 w/o a good outside shot, so I think he's going to need to drastically improve his quickness or extend his range- or really do both. But he has the higher upside.
Mickey is more comparable to Tasmin Mitchell in the sense that he's to slow to play the 3 & too short to match up w/ a lot of NBA 4's. (Admittedly, his defense is better than Taz, but his offense is not as developed). He really needs to stay another year
Mickey is more comparable to Tasmin Mitchell in the sense that he's to slow to play the 3 & too short to match up w/ a lot of NBA 4's. (Admittedly, his defense is better than Taz, but his offense is not as developed). He really needs to stay another year
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News