Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

New signing rules and attrition

Posted on 12/9/17 at 10:03 am
Posted by SpencerRob
Pass Christian, MS
Member since May 2008
1135 posts
Posted on 12/9/17 at 10:03 am
Managing player retention is about to become the most important aspect of running a college program. If your program averages 3 juniors declaring for the draft every year, combined with 2 transfers per year, you will be carrying 80 scholarship players after a four year cycle. If you add to that equation 2 of your 25 signees every year are juco, which have only 2 years of eligibility, in a four year cycle you would then have 76 scholarship athletes. This could be exacerbated very quickly with grade risks, suspensions and injuries. It seems like inviting walk-ons that are good enough to put on scholarship as juniors or seniors is going to be a crucial element to the stability of talent in the program.
Posted by LaPride55
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2017
357 posts
Posted on 12/9/17 at 10:35 am to
Agreed. Clearly the NCAA's attempt at parity. It will prevent the NFL talent rich schools from grabbing an extra 3-5 recruits each year to fill positions lost to the draft, and those kids will end up at 2nd tier programs.
Posted by mgdtiger
Member since May 2006
2841 posts
Posted on 12/9/17 at 10:44 am to
Where are redshirts in that equation.
Posted by SpencerRob
Pass Christian, MS
Member since May 2008
1135 posts
Posted on 12/9/17 at 10:55 am to
Every 5 redshirts would bump you +1 in your 4 year cycle number, so that would certainly help a bit in maintaining scholarship numbers, but of course they aren’t available to play, so you get even thinner on depth.
Posted by Sir Fury
Member since Jan 2015
4571 posts
Posted on 12/9/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Agreed. Clearly the NCAA's attempt at parity. It will prevent the NFL talent rich schools from grabbing an extra 3-5 recruits each year to fill positions lost to the draft, and those kids will end up at 2nd tier programs.


Actually, this could potentially help a school like LSU, who for the last several years have been in a last-minute battles with schools like Alabama and FSU. Alabama has been masterful at processing players. But, with this early signing period, these last-minute players may see the “process” before they commit. It could sway a player or two away from Bama and to LSU, instead.
Posted by Terry the Tiger
Cypress, Texas
Member since Jul 2009
3494 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:59 am to
I don’t think you are correctly evaluating the situation. Let’s take your scenario of 3 juniors declaring and 2 transfers every season. Then assume that you have 20 seniors that run out of eligibility (like LSU did this season and not all of those were even on scholarship), then all you have to do is sign a full class of 25 that year to get yourself back up to the full allotment of 85 scholarships. The juniors declare before the February signing period, so you can make up for them. The only time you would be in trouble
is if you have a rash of transfers after spring practice or in the summer. But more times than not, those that transfer are “processed” to make room to get below the 85 limit anyway.

I think the only way that you would really have issues is if you had a lot of seniors run out of eligibility, then a lot of juniors declare, and a lot of underclassman transfer. Then you might have some issues gettting to 85. But if you have that happen, then you probably have bigger issues to worry about.

I think staying below the 85 limit is more of a challenge than keeping 85.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12896 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Terry the Tiger
Most of the time...yes, agreed. Transfers like we had this offseason aren't going to happen every year.

If the NCAA would like to force the old "preferred walk-on" system that Nebraska used so well, I'm all for it. I think LSU and this staff pulling from LA & TX talent could do very well with it.

With attrition and the 25 hard limit, you can almost promise a walk-on a schollie without officially using a grey-shirt. And with this being NCAA wide and pretty damn firm, you won't have other schools thumbing their noses and undercutting you with 32 signees, grey shirts, and blue shirts.

You just better have excellent recruiters with good HS ties, very good evals, and an even better RC to put the pieces together.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram