Started By
Message
locked post

Is LSU in the best geographical location in the country?

Posted on 11/26/11 at 5:06 pm
Posted by heehaw
Member since May 2009
4584 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 5:06 pm
Obviously Louisiana produces a lot of talent and LSU doesnt have any other in state powerhouses to compete with.

We are also right next to Texas, and are reasonably close to pretty much every state state in the south ie the region with the best and most talent.

Can any other school say they have a better advantage geographically?
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
74036 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 5:18 pm to
Alabama also produces a lot of talent, but is closer to Florida and Georgia than we are.
Posted by RollTigers
Member since Dec 2010
3274 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 5:20 pm to
UCLA, TCU, FSU have arguments.

UCLA - the 'LA' part tells it all. Most appealing city in the country to a HS kid probably.

TCU is in the best city in the best state for high school football.

FSU is in the second-best state for football, and they're far north enough to really appeal to the deep south states that produce so much talent - Alabama, Georgia, maybe occasionally Louisiana and Mississippi.
Posted by Round Rock Tiger
Member since Sep 2011
84 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 6:08 pm to
Texas - Because being in the heart of TX helps them dominate this state in recruiting.
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
23981 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

UCLA - the 'LA' part tells it all. Most appealing city in the country to a HS kid probably.




I respectfully disagree, I think Miami is way more appealing
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13117 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 6:42 pm to
I think the Alabama schools are in the best location. Alabama,Georgia and Florida are loaded with talent. They're also centrally located in the southest to allow them to be next door to Mississippi,and close enough to North Carolina and South Carolina(2 of the most underrated states for talent in the country) to get kids. Also close enough to Virginia and Maryland to be able to get kids every now and then. They also are close enough to sneak into LA some.

LSU has the greatest recruiting advantage(along with Ohio St) in the country because we're the only major in a high producing state. Being next to Texas is an advantage and one quite frankly I think we don't take full advantage of.
Posted by Bigsike
Member since Jan 2009
1382 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 9:50 pm to
Tulane will end this advantage.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
74036 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 9:56 pm to
Recruiting is why I wish we added VaTech instead of Mizzou (I like Mizzou for family reasons). I wanted to put that Tidewater area in SEC country. Adding Houston (and Dallas to a much lesser extent) and Tidewater, VA to the SEC footprint would have put just about every fertile, athlete-producing area in the country in an attainable place for the top tier SEC teams.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285127 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 10:13 pm to
Lsu is in a great spot being the lone relevant school in the state as well as being close to west TX, Miss, Bama, ATL and parts of Florida. You cant ask for a better situation IMO
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 10:16 pm to
FSU, UF, and Texas are all up there.
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
29341 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

UCLA, TCU, FSU have arguments.

UCLA - the 'LA' part tells it all. Most appealing city in the country to a HS kid probably.

TCU is in the best city in the best state for high school football.

FSU is in the second-best state for football, and they're far north enough to really appeal to the deep south states that produce so much talent - Alabama, Georgia, maybe occasionally Louisiana and Mississippi.




Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35597 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 11:11 pm to
LSU is the only school in Louisiana worth a damn....unlike the MS, AL, GA or FL schools..........HUGE advantage


LSU is tucked in neatly beside Texas......Houston is super close...........Huge advantage

LSU is close to the Southern Mississippi cities. Good advantage

LSU plays Florida every year.....good advantage.


Louisiana has terrific talent.....Huge advantage.


Appealing city of New Orleans for entertainment purposes........Dunno, but put that in there.







Places that we could fare better due to geography.....Memphis, The State of Arkansas (their coach is a supreme bitch by the way), St Louis, Kansas City.

All up north of BR.....but would like to see more from Arky....there is always a great talent like Keihl Frasier, Darious Winston, Ziemba, Matt Hall. Etc.


I only remember a fullback or lb from Arky, but cannot remember his name...White feller.
This post was edited on 11/26/11 at 11:14 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285127 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 11:32 pm to
Matt stoltz
Posted by tigerwoods
Hillman
Member since Jan 2007
3176 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 12:05 am to
quote:

being close to west TX


you mean East TX??
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
74036 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 12:08 am to
quote:

St Louis, Kansas City

quick, name the last player besides Jeremy Maclin from either of these metro areas that would be an impact player in the SEC.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285127 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 12:31 am to
josh freeman was from stl, no
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285127 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 12:33 am to
quote:

you mean East TX??



yea duh
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
74036 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 12:48 am to
quote:

josh freeman was from stl, no


KC. But yeah, evidence against my point, but not much. Traditionally KC guys go to Mizzou or Nebraska and STL guys go to Mizzou or Big Ten schools. (obviously before Neb was Big Ten). Laurence Maroney might be the biggest impact guy from STL metro recently before Maclin. And Blaine Gabbert, who went to HS with my cousin.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
79732 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 1:08 am to
quote:

Can any other school say they have a better advantage geographically?


Baton rouge is a dump, i would say a lot of schools have a better advantage. Also Louisiana is a small state.

If you talking about talent in state, then look at a school like UGA. Huge population, only one other fbs school in the state. They should be a contender every year.


I just want to add, you cant field a complete football team with LA talent alone. We produce more talent per capita yes, but we have a low population. Fill this team with all LA talent, and i bet we wont even compete for the west. We were lucky last year. We lucked out again this year with all the lbs in state. Rest is way down though.
This post was edited on 11/27/11 at 1:17 am
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285127 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 1:19 am to
what HS did you go to in stl?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram