- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Carroll, Campbell News + plus
Posted on 12/30/08 at 9:14 pm to tigerbait012
Posted on 12/30/08 at 9:14 pm to tigerbait012
quote:clueless.
USC is so overrated. Every year they have like the easiest schedule and always get upset. If they played against a SEC school they would be raped. Last year the only team they played that was actually good was osu
Posted on 12/30/08 at 9:16 pm to geauxtigers28
quote:
Kelly goes to Ala.
if that happens, then it's Randle to LSU. It's been said quite a bit now that if Randle heads to Bama, then Kelly to LSU.....and vice versa. If I'm not mistaken, Alabama is only taking one of the two.
Posted on 12/30/08 at 9:23 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
Alabama is only taking one of the two
im sure they would take both if they were both willing to sign
Posted on 12/31/08 at 12:12 am to autray
basically knew Carroll was gone....
but I've been hearing good news about Devon Kennard
LSU's class is getting sick. Could be one of the best ever with Campbell unexpectedly now in the mix. Seems like a lot of guys feel like they can play right away maybe?
but I've been hearing good news about Devon Kennard

LSU's class is getting sick. Could be one of the best ever with Campbell unexpectedly now in the mix. Seems like a lot of guys feel like they can play right away maybe?

This post was edited on 12/31/08 at 12:58 am
Posted on 12/31/08 at 12:18 am to usc6158
After this past years performance and the new coaching staff- I'm sure anyone who comes to LSU that can produce solidly will get a look at playing.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 12:57 am to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
campbell is a michigan LOCK
Are you sure?
Campbell Eliminates Michigan
I know nothing is official until he signs somewhere else, but kind of silly to call him a lock when these, relatively current, reports are surfacing.
This post was edited on 12/31/08 at 12:58 am
Posted on 12/31/08 at 12:59 am to usc6158
quote:
Seems like a lot of guys feel like they can play right away maybe?
Nice flame.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:01 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Nice flame.
How is that a flame? LSU has a down year and all of a sudden the best class in the country with an incredible close. It makes perfect sense.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:01 am to usc6158
quote:
Seems like a lot of guys feel like they can play right away maybe?
Probably after this year.
USC has too much star power for their own good.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:01 am to Prominentwon
quote:
if that happens, then it's Randle to LSU. It's been said quite a bit now that if Randle heads to Bama, then Kelly to LSU.....and vice versa. If I'm not mistaken, Alabama is only taking one of the two.
Well, I think that the kids are probably making that decision - heck they may even be conferring. I would assume that if both wanted to attend the same school, that school would make room. However, with each seeming to be focused on those two schools, each school likely gets one each.
This post was edited on 12/31/08 at 1:02 am
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:05 am to usc6158
quote:
How is that a flame?
The fact that LSU produces great classes, almost every year is ignored by your statement, and the implication is "The only reason a player would choose LSU over USC would be so that they could play right away."
Now, you didn't use those words, and maybe I'm taking offense where none is intended, but that's what I'm hearing. And we have our share of negative fans, and many are thinking the same thing, but I'm quicker to jump on an opposing team's fan about that.
Nice flame.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:06 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Nice flame.
Seems more like a valid point than a flame.
Look at Bama's class last year coming off a 7-6 Indy bowl season.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:08 am to usc6158
quote:
LSU has a down year and all of a sudden the best class in the country with an incredible close. It makes perfect sense.
It's not "all of a sudden", either. Many of the kids' formative impressions are made during their sophomore and junior years. A lot of these kids have been recruited since they were freshmen. Also, the consensus is that the payoff for a national championship, recruiting-wise, is not the month after the game, but rather the next recruiting season.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:09 am to Ace Midnight
LSU has always had great classes, but you're crazy if you think they've ever been close to as good as this one is. This may be the best class ever if things fall the right way
Obviously this class goes back to last year, but there has to be a reasoning behind the incredible close on guys that might take place
Obviously this class goes back to last year, but there has to be a reasoning behind the incredible close on guys that might take place
This post was edited on 12/31/08 at 1:12 am
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:10 am to usc6158
Don't worry; no reasonable person would think that is a flame. Then again, probably 85% of the posters on this board are unreasonable. 

Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:16 am to lob1284
quote:
Seems more like a valid point than a flame.
Look at Bama's class last year coming off a 7-6 Indy bowl season.
Well, if you want to rationalize EVERYTHING:
- You explain good recruiting classes following great seasons: Kids want to go where they can win.
-Then you explain bad recruiting classes after miserable seasons: Kids don't want to go to a loser.
-Then you explain good recruiting classes after miserable seasons: Kids want to go where they think they can play right away.
-Then you explain bad recruiting classes after great seasons: Kids don't want to wait to play. The team is "loaded" at their position.
See how easy that is? However, it doesn't require any real thought or analysis to the process. Every kid is individual, and good recruiters consistently bring in better classes, regardless of the situation before or after (though there is unmistakable variation, which typically ebbs and flows with the overall level of talent from School X's recruiting base.)
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:28 am to usc6158
quote:
LSU has always had great classes, but you're crazy if you think they've ever been close to as good as this one is. This may be the best class ever if things fall the right way
Now see? Was that so hard? That actually is true. I'm looking into that myself. Part of it is that Les did assemble a "USC-like" coaching staff - guys who score high marks in recruiting, but not necessarily the best Xs and Os coaches. This year may be the culmination of that.
Also, LSU's classes tend to wax and wane relative to the overall level of Louisiana HS talent. Our top 5 rated commitments (Rivals) are either Louisiana or Houston area players. No surprise there, we recruit Houston as well as any team, including the Texas teams.
10 out of 19 commits (plus 1 confirmed signee, per Rivals) are Louisiana kids, and 3 more are Houston-area kids. The only thing a little unusual since Les took over is that we are getting a few more looks from the state of Georgia, and a mini-pipeline to Michigan (should we get William Campbell).
quote:
Obviously this class goes back to last year, but there has to be a reasoning behind the incredible close on guys that might take place
Yeah, Baton Rouge is a great place to live and LSU is a great place to play football.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:32 am to LSU28605
quote:
Don't worry; no reasonable person would think that is a flame. Then again, probably 85% of the posters on this board are unreasonable.
I'm in the upper-quintile of reasonable posters on this board. I was just reading between the lines. Nobody questions how USC gets the classes they do EVERY YEAR, but LSU gets a great class, possibly the best ever, and the guy comes in and makes a subtle swipe at the program.
I admitted that I might be taking offense where none is intended, but I'm not being unreasonable, I'm being "spirited". I didn't retaliate, directly, nor did I question his parentage. In fact, my comment, "Nice Flame", was not ironic or sarcastic, it was sincere. He slipped it in right at the end.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:34 am to usc6158
does USC even start to be somewhat concerned about UCLA if carroll goes there along with pressley?
This post was edited on 12/31/08 at 2:35 am
Posted on 12/31/08 at 3:01 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
I'm in the upper-quintile of reasonable posters on this board. I was just reading between the lines
that may or may not but true, but you definitely whined like an ultra-sensitive little bitch in this thread
Back to top
