Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Antitrust

Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:05 pm
Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
3061 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:05 pm
Entire B1G is clearly using bs language in their revenue share contracts. We just watched, especially with the B1G commissioner getting involved... the beginning of a can of worms being opened with the Williams situation.
Posted by Shameless
Member since Jan 2017
915 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:16 pm to
College football free agency is an absolute joke. Glad there is something out there keeping kids from taking the biggest bag not even a year after signing a deal for the last bag…
Posted by Tiger2tiga
Member since Sep 2023
1228 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:33 pm to
How is it antitrust? Serious question
Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
3061 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

How is it antitrust? Serious question


It becomes an antitrust question if the Big Ten (a trade association of competing schools) is effectively coordinating a shared restraint on player mobility (or NIL portability) across its members.
The hook is the reporting that:
the agreement is “a Big Ten template document used by all league members,” built for situations like this, and
the commissioner / conference office is involved.

If that’s true, then the theory is: horizontal coordination among competitors on contract terms that restrict movement (and potentially suppress the player market). That’s the same category of conduct the DOJ/FTC have been explicitly focused on in worker-mobility enforcement (no-poach / restrictions on worker mobility).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram