Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Pouring a new home slab over an old one

Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:57 pm
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7630 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 7:57 pm
Ok so my parents home will need to be demolished because of Ida.

My wife and I had been preparing to build ourselves a home.

My parents don't want to rebuild especially anything big because they are up in age and have health issues.

We are planning to build in their place and add them an apartment to our home.

Would it be cheaper/easier to pour our slab over theirs, our home will be bigger so it would cover completely.

Or is it cheaper /easier to have the full slab removed and have dirt hauled in and let it sit?
Posted by LSUtigerME
Walker, LA
Member since Oct 2012
3798 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

Would it be cheaper/easier to pour our slab over theirs, our home will be bigger so it would cover completely.

Or is it cheaper /easier to have the full slab removed and have dirt hauled in and let it sit?


If you want to do it right, remove the old slab and prepare the earth beneath. You’ll have plumbing and other things in the sub grade that you’ll have to install before pouring the slab.

You shouldn’t have to “let it sit” though. You can proof roll it and get adequate compaction.
Posted by footballdude
BR
Member since Sep 2010
1075 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 7:38 am to
have the full slab removed and have dirt hauled in and let it sit
Posted by BlackPot
Member since Oct 2016
2065 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 8:01 am to
You probably would have to get the existing slab tested to make sure you can go over it. If you can, you'd have to haul dirt in regardless to pour a new slab. If your wallet can swing it, I'd probably get it removed and start fresh on a new pad. I know in the back of my head I'd always wonder if it was ok. But that's just my weird thinking.
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
18973 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 8:22 am to
The problem isn't the existing slab per say...that's compacted over time and will serve as a great base. Depending on your layout that will extend further you'll need to build up the soil, run new plumbing, sewer, etc...

It may be less of a headache and peace of mind to have the existing slab demoed and completely re poured to your new design.

Also you'll have the chance to raise the top of slab based on flood elevation.
This post was edited on 9/17/21 at 8:24 am
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
3523 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 9:10 am to
If it was me, that old slab would absolutely be the floor of the crawl space of new home.

And I would absolutely have a safe “room” built in, where the family could go into a closet and disappear below a hatch in the floor in case of emergency.

That’s just me, though.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33910 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 11:43 am to
Unless you take their plans and add on to the sides and not up you can expand the existing slab. Otherwise it's gonna be too much of a hassle trying to work around the existing.
Posted by CootDisCootDat
St. Charles, The Community
Member since May 2014
1643 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 11:54 am to
My parents home burned in 2010. 3rd story attic and all of second story completely gone from fire (started at chimney top on one gable). Entire second floor completely destroyed by water fighting fire. Total loss so they ended up demolishing it. They hauled off everything but the slab. After that, they used the excavator to break it up and bury it. Hauled in a few loads of dirt on top of that and rebuilt a new layout in the same spot. No issues to this day.

I dont think it would be a problem to build on top of it without breaking up and burying but the new house would be 3-4’ higher than the existing finished floor elevation.
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7630 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:07 pm to
I know it can be done, just not sure economically and efficiently if it's worth the headache have an engineer come and re-engineer the slab in my new plan.


Or just haul off the old slab and move dirt.

Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7630 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

dont think it would be a problem to build on top of it without breaking up and burying


I'm not talking about burying. I'm talking about pouring the new slab directly over the old.

I do know in research and speaking with some people, it is completely possible, would require minimum 4" thickness of new slab.

Just not sure economically what's better
Posted by LSUtigerME
Walker, LA
Member since Oct 2012
3798 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

I do know in research and speaking with some people, it is completely possible, would require minimum 4" thickness of new slab.

We’re not talking about a patio or driveway. A house has rebar, mesh, footers, plumbing, and electrical all in or below the slab.

If your slab has a slab beneath it, it will impede many of these things from being in the correct location.
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7630 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

If your slab has a slab beneath it, it will impede many of these things from being in the correct location


Not as long as the slab is poured thick enough to compensate for the space, as I've said I've done some research speaking with some who have some experience with it.
Posted by CootDisCootDat
St. Charles, The Community
Member since May 2014
1643 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 2:10 pm to
Economically speaking, thicker concrete won’t be the cheapest method…
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7630 posts
Posted on 9/17/21 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Message
Pouring a new home slab over an old one by CootDisCootDat
Economically speaking, thicker concrete won’t be the cheapest method…



That's what I'm thinking too, just wanted some other opinions than what I have gotten already
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram