
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why is thread anchored?
Posted on 9/1/11 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 9/1/11 at 4:53 pm
It's legit, only quotes a fraction and relevant part of an article, is actually topical, is accurately named.
don't get it.
LINK
don't get it.
LINK
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:19 pm to TigerFred
you da man Fred! If i need to tone down the language, i'll happily edit.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:27 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:I anchored it. I tire easily of the deluge of "[Media Entity or Person X] hates LSU and/or is certifiably insane for [Media Entity or Person X]'s opinion."
you da man Fred! If i need to tone down the language, i'll happily edit.
No offense to you personally, karma, but it reeks of a pussified fan base.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:29 pm to Ice Cold
Fred
Ice

quote:
I un-anchored it.
Ice
quote:
I anchored it.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:31 pm to Ice Cold
quote:
I anchored it. I tire easily of the deluge of "[Media Entity or Person X] hates LSU and/or is certifiably insane for [Media Entity or Person X]'s opinion."
not to quibble, but so?
and in this situation, i made a clear point, showed proof that ESPN actually was doing a shitty job at analyzing the game.
They said a walk on was the starting linebacker, and listed him as a weakness in Oregon attacking the LSU defense.
That was an accurate and valid criticism of ESPN and the people who wrote that article. they deserved to be made fun of, and the thread is funny.
And even if it wasn't, that's a dumb reason to anchor a topic. That's why this message board exists.
This post was edited on 9/1/11 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 9/1/11 at 6:00 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
they deserved to be made fun of, and the thread is funny.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 8:53 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:This is why so:
not to quibble, but so?
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
quote:Why should anyone give a frick about what ESPN writes about this game? It's a multimedia conglomerate which employs hundreds of minions to write copy about dozens of games every weekend.
showed proof that ESPN actually was doing a shitty job at analyzing the game.
quote:You are entitled to your opinion, however wrong it is.
that's a dumb reason to anchor a topic.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 3:59 am to Ice Cold
quote:
Why should anyone give a frick about what ESPN writes about this game? It's a multimedia conglomerate which employs hundreds of minions to write copy about dozens of games every weekend.
Why should anyone give a frick about an insignificant game that will most likely be forgotten by millions the second it is over? The point is that people do.
Why should 33 million page views happen on a college team's website that isn't even the official website of the university? Quite simply, it just does. People care. And people want to talk about perceived slights against their alma mammy. So the frick what?
Get off your high horse tastemaker. This board exists for the very reasons you're scoffing at.
And it's your job as an admin to remove inappropriate, flaming, inadequately named, and irrelevant topics from the board, not to play taste police and administer your agenda on how you feel like our fan base should be viewed to the outside world.
This board is as close to a meritocracy as exists. If a post sucks, then it's going to fall by the wayside. No amount of bumping will keep it aside. If it sucks badly, people will make fun of it. And the poster will be shamed into fighting or conceding. That is the way of the message board.
And before you play holier than thou about what it takes to be an admin on this board, remember who you're talking to, and remember that there was a time where i was very involved in the runnings of this board. so don't give me any of that shite.
Unless i missed out on a Chicken directive, you shouldn't just be whacking posts just because they happen to be targeting a media outlet. Slandering, sure you step in. But valid criticism? In this situation, you just flat out whiffed.
quote:
You are entitled to your opinion, however wrong it is.
alright td cop. enjoy your e-donuts. I'm glad you've made a point to make your opinion and taste matter more than everyone else. Obviously, other admins didn't see a problem with it.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 12:20 pm to Titus Pullo
nah just argumentative
(that's the other reason message boards exist)
ice cold knows i <3 him.
to ice cold.

(that's the other reason message boards exist)
ice cold knows i <3 him.
to ice cold.

Popular
Back to top
1












