Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Why is thread anchored?

Posted on 9/1/11 at 4:53 pm
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 4:53 pm
It's legit, only quotes a fraction and relevant part of an article, is actually topical, is accurately named.

don't get it.

LINK
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
28027 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:18 pm to
I un-anchored it.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:19 pm to
you da man Fred! If i need to tone down the language, i'll happily edit.
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18953 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

you da man Fred! If i need to tone down the language, i'll happily edit.
I anchored it. I tire easily of the deluge of "[Media Entity or Person X] hates LSU and/or is certifiably insane for [Media Entity or Person X]'s opinion."

No offense to you personally, karma, but it reeks of a pussified fan base.
Posted by chilld28
Get in B Chord and Mash It!!
Member since Nov 2009
29622 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:29 pm to
Fred
quote:

I un-anchored it.

Ice
quote:

I anchored it.


Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

I anchored it. I tire easily of the deluge of "[Media Entity or Person X] hates LSU and/or is certifiably insane for [Media Entity or Person X]'s opinion."


not to quibble, but so?

and in this situation, i made a clear point, showed proof that ESPN actually was doing a shitty job at analyzing the game.

They said a walk on was the starting linebacker, and listed him as a weakness in Oregon attacking the LSU defense.

That was an accurate and valid criticism of ESPN and the people who wrote that article. they deserved to be made fun of, and the thread is funny.

And even if it wasn't, that's a dumb reason to anchor a topic. That's why this message board exists.
This post was edited on 9/1/11 at 5:32 pm
Posted by heatom2
At the plant, baw.
Member since Nov 2010
13114 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 5:32 pm to
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

they deserved to be made fun of, and the thread is funny.
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18953 posts
Posted on 9/1/11 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

not to quibble, but so?
This is why so:

LINK

LINK

LINK

LINK

LINK

LINK

quote:

showed proof that ESPN actually was doing a shitty job at analyzing the game.

Why should anyone give a frick about what ESPN writes about this game? It's a multimedia conglomerate which employs hundreds of minions to write copy about dozens of games every weekend.
quote:

that's a dumb reason to anchor a topic.
You are entitled to your opinion, however wrong it is.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 9/2/11 at 3:59 am to
quote:

Why should anyone give a frick about what ESPN writes about this game? It's a multimedia conglomerate which employs hundreds of minions to write copy about dozens of games every weekend.



Why should anyone give a frick about an insignificant game that will most likely be forgotten by millions the second it is over? The point is that people do.

Why should 33 million page views happen on a college team's website that isn't even the official website of the university? Quite simply, it just does. People care. And people want to talk about perceived slights against their alma mammy. So the frick what?

Get off your high horse tastemaker. This board exists for the very reasons you're scoffing at.

And it's your job as an admin to remove inappropriate, flaming, inadequately named, and irrelevant topics from the board, not to play taste police and administer your agenda on how you feel like our fan base should be viewed to the outside world.

This board is as close to a meritocracy as exists. If a post sucks, then it's going to fall by the wayside. No amount of bumping will keep it aside. If it sucks badly, people will make fun of it. And the poster will be shamed into fighting or conceding. That is the way of the message board.

And before you play holier than thou about what it takes to be an admin on this board, remember who you're talking to, and remember that there was a time where i was very involved in the runnings of this board. so don't give me any of that shite.

Unless i missed out on a Chicken directive, you shouldn't just be whacking posts just because they happen to be targeting a media outlet. Slandering, sure you step in. But valid criticism? In this situation, you just flat out whiffed.

quote:

You are entitled to your opinion, however wrong it is.


alright td cop. enjoy your e-donuts. I'm glad you've made a point to make your opinion and taste matter more than everyone else. Obviously, other admins didn't see a problem with it.
Posted by Titus Pullo
MTDGA
Member since Feb 2011
28567 posts
Posted on 9/2/11 at 4:56 am to
u so mad
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 9/2/11 at 12:20 pm to
nah just argumentative
(that's the other reason message boards exist)

ice cold knows i <3 him.

to ice cold.



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram