- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posting pictures of abortions... Why is this allowed?
Posted on 7/24/15 at 6:58 am
Posted on 7/24/15 at 6:58 am
I'm pro life and I get why people feel the need to post them, but I don't come here to see that kind of brutality and gore.
If the board bans pornography and racist words, it should certainly ban photographs of dead, often mutilated humans. Or, if you're pro choice, photographs of dead, often mutilated fetuses.
At the very least, can we get a warning tag on those threads? Or can we make it so that you can only link the photographs, without posting the image, so that someone is not sudddenly and unwillingly seeing them?
Am I being unreasonable? Like I said, I get why people feel the need to post them. I don't see why I should be forced to see them without knowing ahead of time that I'm going to. A NSFW tag should absolutely be mandatory.
If the board bans pornography and racist words, it should certainly ban photographs of dead, often mutilated humans. Or, if you're pro choice, photographs of dead, often mutilated fetuses.
At the very least, can we get a warning tag on those threads? Or can we make it so that you can only link the photographs, without posting the image, so that someone is not sudddenly and unwillingly seeing them?
Am I being unreasonable? Like I said, I get why people feel the need to post them. I don't see why I should be forced to see them without knowing ahead of time that I'm going to. A NSFW tag should absolutely be mandatory.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 7:43 am to FT
not allowed...
so let me ask you, why didn't you just RA the post? it would taken a lot less time than typing up your thread
so let me ask you, why didn't you just RA the post? it would taken a lot less time than typing up your thread
Posted on 7/24/15 at 12:06 pm to Chicken
quote:
so let me ask you, why didn't you just RA the post?
Because you haven't added the "attach soapbox" option to the RA process yet. Duh.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 12:39 pm to Chicken
Every time I see one in specifically RA multiple times. They don't come down, and I've gotten PMs afterward saying that they would be staying up until someone else RAd.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 4:33 pm to FT
Sounds like you get no respect. No respect i tells ya
Posted on 7/25/15 at 10:40 am to FT
My wife likes to talk to me after sex. So she calls me from her hotel room.
Posted on 7/25/15 at 8:13 pm to Chicken
quote:At the risk of being banned again for questioning the system, I think what he's asking about is a proactive approach (policy shift) versus a reactive approach (RA)...
so let me ask you, why didn't you just RA the post? it would taken a lot less time than typing up your thread
In the list of 13 do's and don'ts, there isn't a comprehensive list of what would be considered 'NSFW'... While it's exhaustive from a pornography perspective, I seem to recall an issue with gifs and videos of people being killed in traffic accidents, suicides, other accidents, etc...
Again, NOT questioning the system... please don't ban me again...

Posted on 7/26/15 at 8:15 am to yankeeundercover
quote:
At the risk of being banned again for questioning the system
quote:
Again, NOT questioning the system...

Popular
Back to top
