- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Admins.....DEAL WITH THIS CRAP!!....Zach has done lost his mind on the PoliBoard
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:30 am to crazy4lsu
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:30 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
But since you are so fond of anecdotal evidence, the one person who I know who was assaulted did not consent, and is not gay.
I'll add that I have a friend who was sexually assaulted as a twelve year old girl. Her abuser was a 28 year old male. She is a lesbian. She absolutely did not want it to happen. She didn't tell because she didn't think anyone would believe her, since he had recently been tried for sexual abuse and was found not guilty.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:33 am to Zach
quote:
If my coach arse raped me he would have been missing several teeth and the cops would have been called before my parents knew what happened.
No you wouldn't have.
quote:
But, do you agree or disagree that this topic is worthy of a thread on the Poli Board?
I don't care.
quote:
To me, censorship and 'being offended' is becoming the real teaching point here, beyond the merits of the topic.
I'm only offended by your stupidity.
This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 11:33 am
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:36 am to Zach
You do not know what you'd do if your coach had sexually abused you. That's stupid. You can't say what you will or will not do in a given situation if you've never been in it. You should've have learned that lesson in life by now.
Start a thread on whatever board you want. I am disgusted by the things you've said and will not be joining in the discussion. I wish I hadn't clicked on this thread.
Why the hell would anyone even begin to defend child sexual abuse? Have you noticed that everyone is repulsed by your opinions?
The things that you have said make me VERY suspicious of you, and I'm extremely thankful that you are nowhere near my child.
Start a thread on whatever board you want. I am disgusted by the things you've said and will not be joining in the discussion. I wish I hadn't clicked on this thread.
Why the hell would anyone even begin to defend child sexual abuse? Have you noticed that everyone is repulsed by your opinions?
The things that you have said make me VERY suspicious of you, and I'm extremely thankful that you are nowhere near my child.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:36 am to Paige
quote:
Are you trying to convince yourself of your point?
No. The word is call 'skeptical.' I propose possibilities and give reasons why those scenarios are possible. It provokes thought. I like provoking thought. Been doing it all my life.
However, this posting experience has really surprised me. I could not care less if Sandusky is taken out and shot this afternoon. Two bullets through the head would be fine. He's scum. Yet I have been accused of defending him, promoting child violence. Some have demanded that I be banned.
It's an excellent lesson in emotion clouding logical thought.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:37 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
No you wouldn't have.
Yes, I would have.
quote:
I don't care.
Not good enough. No new thread.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:38 am to Zach
quote:
It's an excellent lesson in emotion clouding logical thought.
Or maybe an excellent lesson in your stubbornness, where you've been proven wrong time and again.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:39 am to Zach
quote:
Yes, I would have.
No, you wouldn't.
quote:
Not good enough. No new thread.
Some people have to do more than collect trash for a living. It's oddly apropos for you though.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:41 am to Paige
quote:
Why the hell would anyone even begin to defend child sexual abuse?
I didn't.
quote:
Have you noticed that everyone is repulsed by your opinions?
Yes. I now know how Jack Nicholson felt in One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:42 am to Zach
quote:
It provokes thought.
The only thought you are provoking in me is that you sexually abuse children. Being that there are close to 73k members of TD, odds are that there is probably more than one child predator.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:43 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
No, you wouldn't.
Yes, I would. Your turn.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:44 am to Zach
quote:
Why the hell would anyone even begin to defend child sexual abuse?
I didn't.
Yes you have. By saying the children were gay and not forced. It really sounds like you are trying to defend your own actions. IMO.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 11:52 am to Paige
quote:
The only thought you are provoking in me is that you sexually abuse children.
Yep. Do it every day. Hang out at the elementary school and grab a nice plump one.

Edit: Topic over... Have a nice day!
This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:04 pm to Paige
Gotta agree with Zach here - this is at least (or was, from what I can surmise) an interesting point of discussion on a relevant topic. If it makes y'all uncomfortable, then point out why he is wrong or why you disagree with the point.
But calling for threads to be deleted and posters to be banned
Weak shite. If you can't handle tough issues, don't click on the threads.
But calling for threads to be deleted and posters to be banned

Weak shite. If you can't handle tough issues, don't click on the threads.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:24 pm to NaturalBeam
It shouldn't be deleted but Zach is completely wrong in this case. He's thinking that he was as mature and strong minded as a 10 year old as he is today, which is completely untrue. These boys, in their statements, talked about how uncomfortable the interaction made them and how they would try to sit as far away as possible. However, he was showering them with gifts and giving them male attention that they were getting nowhere else. The boys were at a fragile moment in their lives and they were manipulated and brainwashed. None of them wanted the sexual interaction with Sandusky and it's repulsive that anyone here would suggest that.
It sickens me that someone here would suggest that people get molested because they're gay. What about 10 year old girls who are raped by fully grown adult males? I mean, they're most likely straight does that mean they're giving consent? No. There is a reason you cannot give consent as a 10 year old.
It sickens me that someone here would suggest that people get molested because they're gay. What about 10 year old girls who are raped by fully grown adult males? I mean, they're most likely straight does that mean they're giving consent? No. There is a reason you cannot give consent as a 10 year old.
This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:28 pm to NaturalBeam
His only point is that the children raped were obviously gay and wanted it.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:44 pm to NaturalBeam
quote:
Gotta agree with Zach here - this is at least (or was, from what I can surmise) an interesting point of discussion on a relevant topic. If it makes y'all uncomfortable, then point out why he is wrong or why you disagree with the point.
There's no way in hell you read the original thread.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:49 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
There's no way in hell you read the original thread.
Then simply lobby for Chicken to put it up.
Or else, shut up.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:53 pm to LordSaintly
quote:No, I didn't. Because everyone got their panties in a wad and wanted it deleted. I've never asked for a thread to be deleted or a poster banned. It makes me wonder how insecure someone has to be to ask for either of those things.
There's no way in hell you read the original thread.
And I'm not saying I agree with Zach - I don't think the kids are gay. But it does make you wonder why they didn't do more to avoid it or stop it. I suspect they just didn't really understand what was being done to them.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:57 pm to Zach
quote:
Then simply lobby for Chicken to put it up.
Or else, shut up.
I don't really care. I'm never in favor of banning posters for any reason. I guess I'm still wondering what point you were trying to make.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:59 pm to NaturalBeam
They were 10 year old at-risk children. Do you know how vulnerable a 10 year old child, let alone one who doesn't have a positive male influence in his life? You're putting yourself in their shoes with your mature brain. They were as vulnerable as possible and that's what makes Zach's insinuation sickening.
Popular
Back to top
