Started By
Message

5k splits

Posted on 1/26/24 at 11:24 am
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30831 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 11:24 am
Do you guys get better results running positive or negative splits and how much difference is ideal per mile? My natural tendency is to go out fast but it looks like a lot of people think negative splits are the way to a pr
Posted by AmIDonut
Member since Jan 2022
132 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 12:06 pm to
I start out a bit fast. I usually fade throughout the race and then pick it back up the last 400-800m. First mile is usually 20 seconds faster than the other 2. Last 2 miles usually end up about the same pace due to the finishing kick. Probably not ideal but that is my personal preference.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
35062 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 12:19 pm to
I would always end up with faster splits as I went. Probably because I never really warmed up properly though.
Posted by crazyLSUstudent
391 miles away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2012
5515 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 12:21 pm to
I always like starting at about my Vo2max pace and just seeing how long I could hold it. Usually for the first mile and then fade to threshold and hold it there
This post was edited on 1/26/24 at 1:40 pm
Posted by BilbeauTBaggins
probably stuck in traffic
Member since May 2021
4352 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 1:05 pm to
Depends on your splits. IMO you shouldn't be going faster in the latter half of your race. You can go a tiny bit faster in the beginning and possibly maintain towards the end or not die off as much as you're afraid of. You need to know your body and where to push/hold back. How you train is how you race.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
33441 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 1:41 pm to
Its all about running whats best for you. If you like going out quick youre not just going to magically get over that. Focus on the start being a "controlled" fast, settle into your pace by the start of mile 2, then try to gradually build pace until youre all out the last 100-200 meters.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30831 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 2:49 pm to
So it sounds like there is no consensus best way to do it?
Posted by BilbeauTBaggins
probably stuck in traffic
Member since May 2021
4352 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

So it sounds like there is no consensus best way to do it?

How you train is how you race. Ideally you want to give it everything you've got and have nothing left wasted in the end. It will generally take 15 minutes to get your body acclimated in a workout, so a race will lower that threshold. The first half of your race should never feel worse than the second half.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
33441 posts
Posted on 1/26/24 at 7:54 pm to
I mean the best way is what ever works best for you. If you’re used to starting out faster than that’s what will work out best for you. Your job is just to make it something manageable.

For example: the xc team I coach has a wide range of what the kids like to do. Some kids take out faster some take out a little slower and gradually get faster. If I were to tell them all they have to negative split my team would suck. I try to give each individual a race plan that works for them and structure training so no matter what race scenario they find themselves in they feel confident to make the moves needed. Anyone that says you have to run one way or another has no idea what they’re talking about.

ETA: specifically speaking. Generally speaking you don’t want your start to be so hard you die or your finish to be so slow you take yourself out of it but that’s what I mean by the start being manageable.
This post was edited on 1/26/24 at 8:00 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram