- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Official Battlefield 3 Thread
Posted on 2/23/11 at 7:42 pm to Ham Tonks
Posted on 2/23/11 at 7:42 pm to Ham Tonks
quote:
you work for DICE?
I've read endless hype about this game.
Keyword...hype
There is no way a multiplatform game will even come close to a top of the line PS3 exclusive graphics game let alone PC graphics.
quote:
"next-gen graphics on current-gen hardware" comes to mind
The lowest common denominator is the 360.
I ain't doubting DICE, but the 360 hardware is barely even current gen compared to the PS3.
You can listen to all the "hype" you want, but that won't change the fact that the 360 is outdated hardware wise.
Posted on 2/23/11 at 7:57 pm to Antiheroaz
quote:
spoken like a true pc fanboi.
Spoken like a true console fanboy.
Haven't played a PC game in 4 years, and my PS3 and 360 (14000 gamerscore and 13 trophy level) sitting in front of me disagree with you.
quote:
I'm sure consoles will look just fine.
I'm sure the graphics will be fine, but they ain't looking even close to that video
quote:
The article said it will be ported to console..but I've heard that before
You think they are going to redevelop it for each console? IF that article is wrong, at best they will redevelop on one and port to the other....and we all know how that works out.
Posted on 2/23/11 at 8:00 pm to taylork37
again, i'm not arguing any of what you're saying. i know that hype is hype... that's the way i had intended to say it. regardless, you can't tell me that as years progress, developers don't figure out how better to optimize the hardware's output. compare a launch title xbox 360 game with crysis 2, which comes out next month. yes, the 360 will always be limited, but as long as we're stuck with this gen of consoles for the next ~4 years, developers are going to figure out how to use the hardware as best they can. i have a 360, a PS3, and a PC rig--good gaming isn't limited to looks. battlefield 2 is one of maybe 3 games i'll play every 6 months, and it's from 2005.
you don't know anything about this game other than the fact that it a) looks damn good, and b) should be damn good, if it's a true sequel to BF2.
ETA: and this game is being developed on PC, ported to consoles
ETAA:
then why are you so ready to hate on something that's only just being unveiled? and dropping your ballin gamerscore doesn't really give you credibility.
you don't know anything about this game other than the fact that it a) looks damn good, and b) should be damn good, if it's a true sequel to BF2.
ETA: and this game is being developed on PC, ported to consoles
ETAA:
quote:
Haven't played a PC game in 4 years, and my PS3 and 360 (14000 gamerscore and 13 trophy level) sitting in front of me disagree with you.
This post was edited on 2/23/11 at 8:03 pm
Posted on 2/23/11 at 8:09 pm to Ham Tonks
Hopefully some of my friends that refuse to play anything besides Black Ops will at least rent BF3. I convinced one friend to buy BC2 and he just couldn't get in to it.
Posted on 2/23/11 at 8:10 pm to luke18
hopefully, it won't really be like BC2
hopefully, it'll be like BF2
hopefully, it'll be like BF2
Posted on 2/23/11 at 8:20 pm to Ham Tonks
quote:you're comparing the two too much and making it sound like BC2 was shite when it was clearly awesome.
hopefully, it won't really be like BC2
Posted on 2/23/11 at 8:20 pm to Ham Tonks
quote:
regardless, you can't tell me that as years progress, developers don't figure out how better to optimize the hardware's output. compare a launch title xbox 360 game with crysis 2, which comes out next month. yes, the 360 will always be limited, but as long as we're stuck with this gen of consoles for the next ~4 years, developers are going to figure out how to use the hardware as best they can. i have a 360, a PS3, and a PC rig
Optimization 6 years ago is quite a bit different than optimization today. And you even said it, the game is getting ported.
quote:
good gaming isn't limited to looks. battlefield 2 is one of maybe 3 games i'll play every 6 months, and it's from 2005.
No one said it was. I just said it isn't going to look nearly as good on consoles.
quote:
then why are you so ready to hate on something that's only just being unveiled? and dropping your ballin gamerscore doesn't really give you credibility.
No one is hating. The FACT is that it won't look as good on consoles, and that's how I will play the game.
And dropping my GS and trophy level along with the fact that I haven't played a PC game in 4 years (which you didn't mention) is just to show that I am not a PC fanboy.
ETA:
And just because you are having an E-boner over a the hype of a game from a series you clearly religiously love, doesn't mean everyone else should.
This post was edited on 2/23/11 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 2/23/11 at 9:55 pm to taylork37
never said you were a PC fanboy. and you basically just agreed with everything I said, so I'm kind of confused. the fact that it's being ported from PC as opposed to the other way around is a GOOD thing. I'm not telling anyone to love this game. how could I? the gameplay trailer has been out for a day. very few details. fact is it's battlefield 3, and BF2 was awesome. I'm one of a shitload of people who agree. feel free to go to another thread and inadvertently agree with people while simultaneously being a passive-aggressive douche.
Posted on 2/23/11 at 9:59 pm to Acreboy
quote:
you're comparing the two too much and making it sound like BC2 was shite when it was clearly awesome.
yeah, I just usually have to explain the two are different games. BC2 was far from shite. I enjoyed it for weeks, but then it got boring too quickly. there just weren't enough features to keep me hooked. also, the potential for everyone to do whatever the shite they wanted made it hard too.
Posted on 2/23/11 at 10:13 pm to Ham Tonks
I love me some BC2 and play it most everyday. I really hope they implement a limited commander feature for consoles b/c BC2 can turn into a snipe-fest.
The fact that 6 people on your team want to snipe isn't a big factor when there are 32 people on your team, but when you have 16 it really cripples your chances of winning.
The fact that 6 people on your team want to snipe isn't a big factor when there are 32 people on your team, but when you have 16 it really cripples your chances of winning.
Posted on 2/23/11 at 10:16 pm to luke18
I updated the first post to show all relevant info
there is no commander role in BF3. there are 4 classes (probably assault, recon, medic, engineer) with 5 equipment slots. there will be a whole lot more "things" in BF3 than in BC2. squads will probably play a huge role in BF3 like they did in 2. i hope they limit kits or something like that per squad so that everyone on the team can't snipe like you said.
there is no commander role in BF3. there are 4 classes (probably assault, recon, medic, engineer) with 5 equipment slots. there will be a whole lot more "things" in BF3 than in BC2. squads will probably play a huge role in BF3 like they did in 2. i hope they limit kits or something like that per squad so that everyone on the team can't snipe like you said.
Posted on 2/24/11 at 7:48 am to Ham Tonks
quote:
never said you were a PC fanboy.
So you are throwing around my quotes from responses to other poeple and applying your own context?
I showed my gamer score and trophy level because AntiHeroz called me a PC fanboy...you then said that gave me no credibility....sounds like you were calling me a fanboy.
quote:
and you basically just agreed with everything I said,
No I didn't..you seem to think that optimzation means the same as it did 6 years ago when the console was released, not to mention the fact that being ported from any other platform is not as good as developing it on that platform itself.
quote:
I'm not telling anyone to love this game. how could I?
You aren't telling everyone to love it, again I never said that. You can't read. You are pissed at me because I am not praising the future graphics on the consoles, instead i'm being realistic about it.
quote:
the gameplay trailer has been out for a day. very few details. fact is it's battlefield 3, and BF2 was awesome. I'm one of a shitload of people who agree. feel free to go to another thread and inadvertently agree with people while simultaneously being a passive-aggressive douche.
No one is arguing how good it is...you completely turned this into something more than it was. This argument somehow turned into me hating the game because you have a hard on for the series, all because i said it won't look the same on consoles.
Not sure how I am passive aggresive... you just couldn't understand the argument that I made in my last post.
Posted on 2/24/11 at 7:51 am to taylork37
Cliffs? Can we fastforward to BF3? Anybody preorder yet? I has duh wantz.
Posted on 2/24/11 at 8:14 am to Ham Tonks
quote:
They will come out in San Francisco.
Nice touch.
Posted on 2/24/11 at 11:02 am to Ham Tonks
So Wilson,,,Are you a pc or 360?
Posted on 2/24/11 at 12:10 pm to taylork37
seriously, I don't have time to keep reading some regurgitated defense. I don't post on here to argue. you go do your thing and I'll do mine. k punkin?
Posted on 2/24/11 at 12:15 pm to Ham Tonks
You win for being the better man here.
Posted on 2/24/11 at 12:26 pm to Ham Tonks
regurgitated because you cant comprehend
I was doin my thing till you got all hot and bothered about it.

I was doin my thing till you got all hot and bothered about it.
Posted on 2/24/11 at 1:01 pm to The Sad Banana
updated with a link to higher res trailer still too, big guy
Popular
Back to top


1



