Started By
Message

re: PS4 Madden Franchise - (Year 2 - Week 12)

Posted on 9/17/15 at 11:26 am to
Posted by WilliamTaylor21
383 Hoosier Daddy Lane
Member since Dec 2013
38918 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 11:26 am to
I'm about to try to trade Phillip for Kap.

The 49ers 2nd highest team need is WR so I'm giving them a WR with Phillip.

Here's what I'm trying:

Colts get:
QB Kaepernick (80)
WR Boykin (72) [to keep them under player limit]

49ers get:
QB Rivers (92)
WR Kearse (83)
2016 3rd round pick

Kearse will be their #1 receiver and they get a QB for a few years to throw to him, and a third round pick to get a QB to replace Rivers if they so choose.

Any objections?
Posted by TruLsu
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
8934 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 11:40 am to
from Bills Coach Bawwww
Posted by WilliamTaylor21
383 Hoosier Daddy Lane
Member since Dec 2013
38918 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 11:42 am to
Damnnnn, they rejected it! I thought that would be an easy accept.

Changed the 3rd rounder to a 2nd and they still rejected it!
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34128 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 12:42 pm to
Who has Kam Chancellor. I'm interested in giving a nice offer for him
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34128 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 12:44 pm to
It's damn near impossible for the CPU to accept the trade.


I vote we do force trades as long as we run it by everyone and everyone agrees it's fair
Posted by WilliamTaylor21
383 Hoosier Daddy Lane
Member since Dec 2013
38918 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 12:50 pm to
I vote against force trades
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34128 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Colts get:
QB Kaepernick (80)
WR Boykin (72) [to keep them under player limit]

49ers get:
QB Rivers (92)
WR Kearse (83)
2016 3rd round pick



That's probably the best trade that can be offered and you even switched it to a second round pick and they still rejected it. It's bullshite and it was that way last year. It makes trades impossible.


I get that we dont want everyone trading top tier players for top tier players all the time, but when the CPU doesn't accept trades like that it's ludicrous and unrealistic. 49ers would take that shite and run, even if Rivers is 33.


We dont have to do force trades, but it would be nice if trades were done differently, otherwise it will never happen realistically.It's impossible because the CPU doesn't accept logical trades. They only accept bullshite ones.
This post was edited on 9/17/15 at 1:28 pm
Posted by TruLsu
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
8934 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 2:34 pm to
I am unsure exactly how the cpu looks at this trade but from what offense the 49ers are going to run Rivers isn't the best suited for it.

He may only be like an 85 or something in their system and Kaep be like a 83 (IDK)

but if I am tailor-made for a read option roll out qb I have no business in trying to get Rivers.


I also may be over thinking this and giving the AI a little too much credit here.
Posted by Chadaristic
Member since Jan 2011
41017 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

49ers would take that shite and run, even if Rivers is 33.



This is opinion and can not be proven. They may accept it irl, but I don't think they would say yes immediately as if it were an obvious upgrade. In fact, the only reason I think they would consider it is because of the value that NFL teams place on draft picks.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34128 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 2:48 pm to
Well cool, I was trying to help the league out but frick me
Posted by Chadaristic
Member since Jan 2011
41017 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 2:56 pm to



No need to get into a tizzy.



All I am saying is, I disagree with you on the fact that the Niners would "take that shite and run". Rivers doen't really fit what they are trying to do. That imo, is probably the reason the trade was declined.
Posted by AUEagle225
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2010
2582 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 2:57 pm to
If the cpu doesn't accept the trade then it's not happening.

Yes, the trade looks decent, but is it what their team really needs in the trade or it just what you want/need out of it?

This is why I was close to almost not even allowing trades with cpu. If we start forcing trades then there won't be any decent cpu teams left in the league.


Why's everyone so gung-ho with trades right now? Ya'll drafted these players so why wouldn't ya'll want to progress them and see how they turn out?
Posted by SumterCoDawg
Member since Apr 2015
5315 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Why's everyone so gung-ho with trades right now? Ya'll drafted these players so why wouldn't ya'll want to progress them and see how they turn out?
For me I wanted Corn Washington bc he can play olb and DE for me, meaning I could cut one of my DEs and add another RB for depth, one injury there in a game and I would've been in a rough spot. Also Corn is a UGA guy so that means he's automatically a badass worthy of a roster spot on the Texans.
Posted by WilliamTaylor21
383 Hoosier Daddy Lane
Member since Dec 2013
38918 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Why's everyone so gung-ho with trades right now? Ya'll drafted these players so why wouldn't ya'll want to progress them and see how they turn out?


I didn't draft my team and hate it.

I was under the impression the draft was the 13th, then the next time I looked it had already happened. And I always use a mobile QB when playing Madden so once I can get that issue fixed I'll be fine with my team.
This post was edited on 9/17/15 at 7:33 pm
Posted by TruLsu
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
8934 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

I didn't draft my team and hate it.

I was under the impression the draft was the 13th, then the next time I looked it had already happened


I also disagree with forced trades. Basically so far I am kind of seeing the trend that it's hard to trade with CPU. Well if it's that hard then I'm all for open trading.

I do ask if you have a trade accepted by CPU to post it in this thread.
Posted by 44tiger
Member since Aug 2013
964 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 7:30 pm to
Guys cardinals and Rams are still trying to figure this out. It will let us play other online matches but will not put us in the other's session after accepting an invite. We've tried everything and I can't find any tips online other make sure our NAT is set to type 2. We will keep trying but any tips would be great.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34128 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Yes, the trade looks decent, but is it what their team really needs in the trade or it just what you want/need out of it?


I think you're giving too much credit to the CPU


quote:

This is why I was close to almost not even allowing trades with cpu. If we start forcing trades then there won't be any decent cpu teams left in the league.



He was losing in the trade in every aspect. He was giving up a better QB for a lesser QB. No matter the factors of fitting scheme or not. But whatever. I wasn't wanting to trade at all, I was just calling out how BS it is that they didn't take the trade.
Posted by 44tiger
Member since Aug 2013
964 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 7:52 pm to
Commish can go ahead and sim Rams vs Cardinals. With no viable solution we aren't gonna hold the league up any longer.
Posted by TruLsu
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
8934 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 7:53 pm to
I'm concerned about what that was about. First I have heard about it on this madden :/
Posted by 44tiger
Member since Aug 2013
964 posts
Posted on 9/17/15 at 7:55 pm to
From reading online it's seems to occur each year in Madden and I couldn't find any fix.
Jump to page
Page First 43 44 45 46 47 ... 120
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 45 of 120Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram