I played through the Crysis trilogy here are my thoughts

In 2017, I finally have a PC that can play Crysis at a tolerable framerate with all the bells and whistles turned up. Hilariously the framerate still dips pretty bad especially when the physics get nuts, but my processor is an old Ivy Bridge Core i5 from like 2012 running at stock speeds.

I kinda liked the simplicity of it, and it felt like a PC shooter (even has quicksave button). There were some frustrating design choices made where the good parts were really good and the bad parts were really bad.

Pretty average game that gets grossly overrated by PC elitists.

Crysis 2 on the other hand was a lot of fun. I may be a console peasant, but I liked the urban environment and more tunnel-like progression. You still find yourself in large, open combat arenas where you can progress any number of ways, so in actuality, I don't feel it's that much different from the first game. In many ways it's even better due to the linear nature of the second half of the first game.

The game feels polished and well optimized, still looks great, the shooting feels good, and the plot/action set pieces were entertaining throughout. I'd put the single player campaign in Crysis 2 on par with any CoD or Halo.

Crysis 3 was just awful. The graphics look better, but everything is grey/brown. Almost the entire game takes place at dusk or at night, meaning you can't see anything.

The environments were far more open and secondary objectives returned (although I don't really know what completing them will do for you), so there's that.

The story is just goofy and the enemies are a lot less fun to fight. There's actually a lot less shooting in Crysis 3 overall. The game is also really short, clocking in at about 6 hours total.