Started By
Message

re: Best Steak in Baton Rouge

Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:26 am to
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:26 am to
quote:

(like the Flemmings manu states, which I would trust over an internet link, and eventhough the menu says warm),




Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:27 am to
Seriously END THIS..

Just answer WHICH picture your steak most resembled? The Med-Well one or the Wed-Rare one?
Posted by Broken Egg
Member since Jan 2008
777 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:27 am to
Yall need to get a room...

But seriously...I think I understand the physics of the discussion, and I don't agree that a steak can be warm and red. It will continue to be red till the heat from cooking changes the texture and color of the meat. If it is still red, then the heat hasn't arrived completely at the center.

It is either warm and pinkish red, pink, slightly pink...but pink.

Or it is cold, cool, coolish and red.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:29 am to
I think it just varies on what you consider pink. The picture I posted is described as being pink even though some people might call that red. I really just want to know what his steak he claimed was pink that he was served really looked like.. The one in pic A or pic B.

If he says it looks like pic A then I will be perfectly willing to say he was served an overcooked steak. What would you say BE dont you think the pic in B is of a Med-Rare steak?
This post was edited on 4/29/09 at 9:32 am
Posted by Dixie
2401 Tulane Ave. NOLA
Member since Apr 2009
1154 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:33 am to
"At medium rare your steak should be warm through the middle with a hint of red. Most of the center of the steak should be pink. The sides should be well browned, the top and bottom charred to a dark brown color. This steak should have a firm surface but be soft in the middle. "

This is your internet defination.

This defination doesn't match the menu description on Flemmings menu...

The bottom pic is close, but still over what I get a most high end steakhouses. The top pic is closer to what I got at LV. So go figure that one out.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:35 am to
That would be why Flemmings' menu states what their doneness is so that you know what to order...

Do we have a winner? Is this what you were served?

Posted by Broken Egg
Member since Jan 2008
777 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:35 am to
The top one is MW and the bottom one is MR...but it is MR for a strip, porter, sirloin (but not a crosscut)...it is not a MR for a good filet. I would send it back as overcooked if that is how it came to me for a filet.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:36 am to
I would agree with that.. I was using these because Dixie said he ordered a ribeye.
This post was edited on 4/29/09 at 9:37 am
Posted by Dixie
2401 Tulane Ave. NOLA
Member since Apr 2009
1154 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Do we have a winner? Is this what you were served?


Yes.
And that matches my original description back on page 2 of what was served to me.
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:38 am to
Not choosing sides, in fact, I can't remember who said what. But in that last picture, I would call that "slightly over cooked med. rare"..
Posted by Broken Egg
Member since Jan 2008
777 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Not choosing sides, in fact, I can't remember who said what. But in that last picture, I would call that "slightly over cooked med. rare"..


perfect example of not everyone having the same defination of steaktemps. That is a MW steak.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:41 am to
quote:

And that matches my original description back on page 2 of what was served to me


that is cooked to medium. You can see that there is barely any pink in the med-well but much mroe pink in the med pic. I could understand if a steak was cooked for med and ordered med-rare but never if a steak was cooked to med-well and ordered med-rare that is two stages.



Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:41 am to
quote:

example of not everyone having the same defination of steaktemps
works for me,,, Ford/Chevy
Posted by Broken Egg
Member since Jan 2008
777 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:44 am to
I'm not beating up on you Geaut, it's just that this disagreement will never be settled...You have a great analogoy...Ford vs Chevy.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:51 am to
Thats why I broke out pics. word descriptions are hard to go by without a color pallet. If I ordered a med-rare steak and I got that last picture which he says is what he got then I would consider my steak overcooked. The desc he gave though at first I would not have considerd it overcooked but just right.
Posted by Dixie
2401 Tulane Ave. NOLA
Member since Apr 2009
1154 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:51 am to
quote:

that is cooked to medium.


I not refering to the pic above this post on page 6, but the two pics on page 5. The top one is the way my steak was served.

and I still believe that LV just missed on this steak, I have had other great meals there, and I will continue to go back. they have a very good restaurant.
This post was edited on 4/29/09 at 9:54 am
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:53 am to
DA frick!

SHOWING YOU PIC

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we have a winner? Is this what you were served?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Yes.
And that matches my original description back on page 2 of what was served to me.




Now you say that it was the other pic? You are one argumentative SOB
This post was edited on 4/29/09 at 9:56 am
Posted by Dixie
2401 Tulane Ave. NOLA
Member since Apr 2009
1154 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Seriously END THIS..

Just answer WHICH picture your steak most resembled? The Med-Well one or the Wed-Rare one?


I was answering this post, I really dont mean to be arugmentative. I was just answering your previous question and not looking at the third pic you posted
This post was edited on 4/29/09 at 9:58 am
Posted by Broken Egg
Member since Jan 2008
777 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 10:01 am to
Once again...it doesn't matter either way. I have had overcooked steaks at Mortons on Canal, and paid handsomely for it to be recooked. Everybody misses sometime, and you will never get consensus on this topic.

Edit: and I didn't explain or ask for a defination of what the steak was going to look like in the middle. I just expected it to be right because of what I was paying. However, the chef did bring my new steak back to the table and appologize for overcooking the first. I don't think they make that mistake very often.
This post was edited on 4/29/09 at 10:06 am
Posted by cbtullis
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2004
6814 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 10:30 am to
I'm going to Ruths tommorow for lunch and now I am confused as frick. Thank you guys!!
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram