- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:35 pm to reddman
I think port failed to mention in the poll question that this would be a NON-keeper league.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:35 pm to reddman
quote:
Why the frick not?
i'd prefer as few subjective moving parts as possible.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:36 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
rmcc must hate interleague play too.
indifferent :jump1: :jump2: :jump1:
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:36 pm to reddman
imo you take each owners total points from year 1, and in year 2 just go down the list and even numbers by rank in 1 conf, odds in the other
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:36 pm to reddman
quote:
I think port failed to mention in the poll question that this would be a NON-keeper league.
wow. frick that. thats a pretty big thing to not mention. re-poll
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:38 pm to rmcc316
quote:
frick that. thats a pretty big thing to not mention
think its pretty much assumed by going to a 2-division, 2 player pool set-up the league will be non-keeper.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:38 pm to rmcc316
quote:
i'd prefer as few subjective moving parts as possible.
But what if one conference for whatever reason is having constant turnover and is just not as competitive as the other one? That gives some owners a better shot at making the superbowl. Things need to be shaken up to keep everything equal.
Please don't compare this to communism, or I will frick you up.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:38 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
imo you take each owners total points from year 1, and in year 2 just go down the list and even numbers by rank in 1 conf, odds in the other
Yeah, i said that about a page ago.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:39 pm to rmcc316
quote:
wow. frick that. thats a pretty big thing to not mention. re-poll
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:39 pm to reddman
quote:
Please don't compare this to communism, or I will frick you up.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:40 pm to rmcc316
I thought we would vote on keepers, locked in conferences, ect after the expansion vote passes. 14 of us shouldn't decide the rules for the rest of the league.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:40 pm to reddman
it doesnt look like 1 vote will even matter
leggo!
leggo!
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:41 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
keeper
quote:
locked in conferences
these 2 go hand-n-hand, no?
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:43 pm to Honkus
Yeah unless people want locked in conferences with 0 keepers.
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:44 pm to Honkus
Yes, if it's a keeper league, you can't switch up conferences.
And vice-versa.
And vice-versa.
This post was edited on 7/14/11 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:44 pm to reddman
quote:
Yes, if it's a keeper league, you can switch up conferences.
you can?
This post was edited on 7/14/11 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 7/14/11 at 3:49 pm to reddman
You could make it a keeper league if you just kept one player FWIW
team with the bes record gets to choose who they are keeping. It would have to be someone on their team, obviously.
EX: If Me and Les both had Charles and he did better than me, he would get first choice over me to keep him.
team with the bes record gets to choose who they are keeping. It would have to be someone on their team, obviously.
EX: If Me and Les both had Charles and he did better than me, he would get first choice over me to keep him.
Popular
Back to top



2





